· Private foundation
Trikha Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHEAST OHIO SQUASH RACQUETS ASSOCIATION | $6,000 |
| IDEASTREAM | $3,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO | $3,000 |
| URBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| FRIENDS OF SEVA MANDIR INC | $1,500 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC | $1,500 |
| NORTHEAST OHIO SQUASH RACQUETS ASSOCIATION | $1,200 |
| URBAN SQUASH CLEVELAND | $1,000 |
| VEDANTA SOCIETY OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK | $1,000 |
| SEAL VETERANS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| BLUE MOUNTAIN CENTER OF MEDITATION INC | $750 |
| CUYAHOGA COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY | $750 |
| CHINMAYA MISSION CLEVELAND | $500 |
| CLEVELAND FOUNDATION | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UCURBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL6× · 2020–2025 · $81k · revenue +140%
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC7× · 2019–2025 · $26k · revenue +67%
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO5× · 2019–2025 · $24k · revenue +50%
Funded once
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +67%
GIVEDIRECTLY INCone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -32%- TOTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Open new york education, inc. supports public education, awareness, and engagement around housing issues to help build a movement for a more abundant and inclusive new york.
To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.
The ohio state bar association (the "association") is an unincorporated voluntary non-profit organization. the association was formed to promote justice and advance the interests of the legal profession.
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…
The org. is a section of the united states tennis assoc. and is dedicated to carrying out the goals of the national assoc. within its region, particularly with respect to promoting tennis opportunities for juniors and adults of all…
To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.
Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…
United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban Community School and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds URBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST OHIO SQUASH RACQUETS ASSOCIATION DBA GREATER CLEVELAND SQUASH ↗
- Who funds IDEASTREAM ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE MOUNTAIN CENTER OF MEDITATION INC ↗
- Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SEVA MANDIR INC ↗
- Who funds SEAL Veterans Foundation ↗
- Who funds URBAN SQUASH CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
- Who funds THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED ↗
- Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
- Who funds Swat Relief Initiative ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Trikha Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.