Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tricoastal Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$476k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.4MEnvironment$870kInternational$807kAnimals$750kEducation$655kCivil Rights$300kPublic Benefit$200kHousing & Shelter$110kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $500
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $260k
$15,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$7.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAVE THE CHILDREN$150,000
WILD ROCKIES FIELD INSTITUTE$60,000
HORSE NORTH INC$50,000
TRAVERSE CITY FILM FESTIVAL$25,000
GROUNDWORKS CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES$25,000
ROSS VALLEY PLAYERS$25,000
SONOMA EQUINE RESCUE REHAB$25,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$15,000
ON THE GROUND GLOBAL$15,000
FOR LOVE OF WATER$15,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ARBOR DAY FUND$10,000
ASPCA$10,000
THE DOE FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%ROSS VALLEY PLAYERS: $30k → 8%GROUNDWORKS CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES: $150k → 7%PARALLEL 45 INC: $25k → 10%HORSE NORTH INC: $500k → 10%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $150k → 9%THE CAMPAIGN FOR FREE COLLEGE TUITION: $30k → 9%INSTITUTE OF POLITICS - THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $200k → 14%ROSS VALLEY PLAYERS: $30k → 8%GROUNDWORKS CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES: $110k → 7%HORSE NORTH INC: $50k → 10%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $100k → 9%THE CAMPAIGN FOR FREE COLLEGE TUITION: $30k → 9%GROUNDWORKS CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES: $100k → 7%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $100k → 9%THE CAMPAIGN FOR FREE COLLEGE TUITION: $30k → 9%GROUNDWORKS CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES: $100k → 7%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $100k → 9%CAMPAIGN FOR FREE COLLEGE TUITION: $30k → 9%GROUNDWORKS CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES: $100k → 7%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $100k → 9%GROUNDWORKS CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES: $100k → 7%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $100k → 9%GROUNDWORKS CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES: $100k → 7%NEW YORK CITY BALLET: $100k → 17%ON THE GROUND GLOBAL: $60k → 7%NEW YORK CITY BALLET: $100k → 17%ON THE GROUND GLOBAL: $50k → 7%NEW YORK CITY BALLET: $100k → 17%NEW YORK CITY BALLET: $100k → 17%SONOMA EQUINE RESCUE REHAB: $50k → 8%NEW YORK CITY BALLET: $75k → 17%NEW YORK CITY BALLET: $50k → 17%JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER: $50k → 17%NEW YORK CITY BALLET: $50k → 17%JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER: $50k → 17%JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER: $50k → 17%JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER: $50k → 17%JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER: $50k → 17%JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $100k → 17%JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $100k → 17%JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
MI
NY
CT
CA
NE
VA
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 23 repeat orgs$254k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
4

Total granted

$5.0M
$253k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+347%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationAnimalsEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GROUNDWORK CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $810k · revenue +78%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $650k · revenue +14%
  • NY
    NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $575k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • IO
    INSTITUTE OF POLITICS - THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2017 · $200k
  • SC
    SONOMA COUNTY WILDLIFE RE
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • RF
    RAINFOREST FLOWgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue +347%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

—
8
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
9
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
10
World Monuments Fund Inc

Wmf is the leading independent organization devoted to safeguarding the world's most treasured places to enrich people's lives and build mutual understanding across cultures and communities. the organization is headquartered in new york…

Arts & Culture
11
The Cultural Landscape Foundation

A non-profit established in 1998, the cultural landscape foundation (tclf) connects people to places. tclf educates and engages the public to make our shared landscape heritage more visible, identify its value, and empower its stewards.…

Arts & Culture
12
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jazz At Lincoln Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GROUNDWORK CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES INC: $810,000 · OtherGROUNDWORK CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES INCHORSE NORTH INC: $550,000 · OtherHORSE NORTH INCJACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 · OtherJACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION INCSAVE THE CHILDREN: $300,000 · OtherSAVE THE CHILDRENINSTITUTE OF POLITICS - THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $200,000 · OtherINSTITUTE OF POLITICS - THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGOON THE GROUND GLOBAL: $129,000 · OtherParallel 45 Inc: $120,000 · Other+8 more: $380,500 · Other+8 moreNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $575,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK CITY BALLET INCJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $275,000 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER IN…ROSS VALLEY PLAYERS: $185,000 · Arts & CultureROSS VALLEY PLAYERSTRAVERSE CITY FILM FESTIVAL: $175,000 · Arts & CultureTRAVERSE CITY FILM FESTIV…Save The Children Federation Inc: $650,000 · InternationalSave The Child…+2 more: $28,000 · InternationalCAMPAIGN FOR FREE COLLEGE TUITION: $220,000 · EducationWILD ROCKIES FIELD INSTITUTE INC: $85,000 · EducationFOR LOVE OF WATER: $60,000 · EnvironmentMarin Art and Garden Center: $55,000 · EnvironmentTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $60,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $40,000 · AnimalsCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $80,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,839,500Arts & Culture$1,210,000International$678,000Education$305,000Environment$115,000Animals$100,000Recreation & Sports$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGROUNDWORK CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES INC: $810,000 over 9y, 8.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $650,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $575,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetJACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $275,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR FREE COLLEGE TUITION: $220,000 over 8y, 48% of budgetROSS VALLEY PLAYERS: $185,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetTRAVERSE CITY FILM FESTIVAL: $175,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetParallel 45 Inc: $120,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetWILD ROCKIES FIELD INSTITUTE INC: $85,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $80,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $70,000 over 7y, 9.8% of budgetFOR LOVE OF WATER: $60,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $60,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMarin Art and Garden Center: $55,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC: $40,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRAINFOREST FLOW: $18,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GROUNDWORK CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMPAIGN FOR FREE COLLEGE TUITION ↗
  • Who funds ROSS VALLEY PLAYERS ↗
  • Who funds TRAVERSE CITY FILM FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds Parallel 45 Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILD ROCKIES FIELD INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR LOVE OF WATER ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Marin Art and Garden Center ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds THE DOE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST FLOW ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tricoastal Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tricoastal Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tricoastal Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tricoastal Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tricoastal’s filings →

More from the funding graph