Skip to content
Triagile Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Triagile Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Education$24kFood & Nutrition$7kHealth$6kHousing & Shelter$3kEnvironment$3kEmployment$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$40k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAKE TECH FOUNDATION$5,000
USA FOR UNHCR$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KRAMDEN INSTITUTE: $250 → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%URBAN MINISTRY OF WAKE COUNTY: $1k → 8%RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION: $525 → 8%RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION: $50 → 8%RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
CA
NE
MD
TN
NC
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34k · 10 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
47

Total granted

$34k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+33%

Still filing today

50%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentHealthAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $23k · revenue +99%
  • FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +46%
  • THE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $2k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +38%
  • D
    DIVURSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
North Carolina Conservation Network

The north carolina conservation network supports, trains, and coordinates diverse groups and directly advocates to achieve equitable and sustainable solutions for our environment.

Environment
6
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
7
Nc Warn Inc

To tackle the accelerating crisis of climate change by working to transition nc to clean, efficient energy & by watch-dogging utility practices. we pursue this work through grassroots activism, technical analysis, legal challenges and…

Environment
8
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
9
Farmer Foodshare Inc

Our mission is to increase access to fresh, local food for all while supporting the viability of marginalized farmers to create a more equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
10
Waste Not Inc

Waste Not cultivates sustainable food systems that help people and the planet flourish. We do this by eliminating food waste and hunger through innovative community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
11
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
12
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Raleigh Rescue Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Umstead Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $23,000 · EducationWAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONLEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $3,750 · OtherLEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETYTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,880 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYCOFFEE: $1,200 · OtherCOFFEERESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC: $1,051 · OtherRESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INCDIVURSITY: $1,000 · OtherEUGENIA AMADI BUGZERO CODES: $1,000 · OtherURBAN MINISTRY OF DURHAM: $1,000 · Other+38 more: $8,490 · Other+38 moreTHE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,575 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,100 · Human ServicesURBAN MINISTRIES OF WAKE COUNTY INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesKRAMDEN INSTITUTE INC: $250 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $1,575 · Food & NutritionRALEIGH CITY FARM INC: $512 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $500 · Food & NutritionA PLACE AT THE TABLE: $250 · Food & NutritionBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · HealthHOPE REINS: $357 · HealthUnited States Association for UNHCR: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $75 · InternationalJOBS FOR LIFE INC: $1,000 · Employment
Education$23,000Other$19,371Human Services$3,925Food & Nutrition$2,837Health$1,357International$1,075Employment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,880 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $1,575 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,575 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC: $1,051 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOBS FOR LIFE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetURBAN MINISTRIES OF WAKE COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM RIDE RESCUE: $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRALEIGH CITY FARM INC: $512 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE REINS: $357 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKRAMDEN INSTITUTE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA PLACE AT THE TABLE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION ACTION INC: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE TAIL AT A TIME NFP: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UMSTEAD COALITION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVETERANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS AFL-CIO: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER ALLIANCE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPASSAGE HOME INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationTriangle Community Fo…North Carolina Commun…United Way of the Gre…Foundation for the Ca…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Raymond James Charita…Natl Christian Charit…The Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …
Duke Energy FoundationNC19.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Triagile Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Triagile Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Triagile Inc?

Find your warmest path to Triagile Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Triagile’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home