Skip to content
Trevor Roberts Memorial Mission Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Trevor Roberts Memorial Mission Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$78kArts & Culture$15kEducation$3kInternational$2kHuman Services$500Philanthropy$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
6
States reached
$205k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MVCA$8,100
STUDENT MOBILIZATION$8,000
INDIA CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES$2,000
CHRISTIAN HANDS IN ACTION$1,600
ONE LINK MINISTRIES$900
HARVEST CHURCH$750
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
TRANSLVANIA SYMPHONY FOUNDATION$500
OBHC$500
KOMEO INT'L MINISTRIES$200
TOYS FOR TOTS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAXWELL EVANS: $200 → 5%LAKESIDE BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 10%P3 ISRAEL: $500 → 11%TRANSLVANIA SYMPHONY FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%CHRISTIAN HANDS IN ACTION: $2k → 13%TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH: $1k → 14%ORU MISSIONS: $950 → 15%BETH HOPKINS: $500 → 16%NORTHWEST BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 16%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%LOVE ISREALORG: $600 → 10%SUNCOAST BAPTIST CHURCH: $750 → 11%CRU: $2k → 13%BRENDA JOHNS: $500 → 14%ONE LINK MINISTRIES: $900 → 16%ASSEMBLY OF GOD WOLD MINISTRIES: $750 → 15%MUSTARD SEED NETWORK: $1k → 18%CBM: $600 → 10%SCORE INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 12%HARVEST CHURCH: $750 → 17%GRACE POINT FELLOWSHIP: $3k → 6%MVCA: $8k → 16%TOYS FOR TOTS: $100 → 7%EAST LEESVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH: $1k → 18%ALLISON ENGLAND: $2k → 5%NATALIE DUVALL: $2k → 13%TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH: $1k → 14%GENERATIONS CHURCH: $8k → 16%OBHC: $500 → 16%FAITH BAPTIST CHURCH: $300 → 11%MVCA: $5k → 16%PROVIDENCE ROAD CHURCH: $800 → 13%TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH: $250 → 14%BROOKE GUARRY: $850 → 16%MVCA: $1k → 16%PROVIDENCE ROAD CHURCH: $800 → 13%WILLOW RANCH: $500 → 16%SUMMIT CHURCH: $2k → 13%SUMMIT CHURCH: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
OH
MO
VA
KS
AR
TN
OK
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62k · 6 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +156% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
22

Total granted

$62k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+156%
+9%

Still filing today

17%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    STUDENT MOBILIZATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $26k
  • M
    MVCA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $14k
  • KI
    KOMEO INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • GC
    GENERATIONS CHURCH CORPORATION
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • SI
    SCORE INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +103%
  • OB
    OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
2
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
3
Indigenous Ministries International Inc

The purpose of IMI is reaching nationals through nationals in ministry.

Religion
4
China Ministries International Inc

To spread and promote gospel and Christian faith to China

—
5
International Messengers

International Messengers is an evangelical, interdenominational missions organization comprised of international staff. We are committed to making disciples of all nations through partnering with local churches to renew, train and mobilize…

Religion
6
Kardo International Ministries

Biblical instruction

Education
7
International Christian Ministries Inc

Train, equip, and disciple pastors and church leaders to serve the Church and fulfill the great commission.

Religion
8
Christian Ministries International
—
9
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services
10
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
11
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
12
Global Mission

To bring the gospel of jesus christ to those who have never heard it and take care of orphans

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA; the most unlike its peers is P3 Israel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STUDENT MOBILIZATION INC: $26,150 · OtherSTUDENT MOBILIZATION INCMVCA: $14,100 · OtherMVCAGENERATIONS CHURCH CORPORATION: $8,250 · OtherGENERATIONS CHURCH CORPORATIONSUMMIT CHURCH: $4,300 · OtherSUMMIT CHURCHGRACE POINT FELLOWSHIP INC: $2,850 · OtherTRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH: $2,675 · Other+21 more: $20,650 · Other+21 moreKOMEO INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $13,100 · InternationalKOMEO INTERNATIONA…INDIA CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · InternationalINDIA CHRISTIAN MI…CHRISTIAN HANDS IN ACTION: $1,600 · InternationalCHRISTIAN HANDS IN…+1 more: $500 · InternationalSCORE INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,100 · ReligionMUSTARD SEED NETWORK: $1,000 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $500 · ReligionOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $3,100 · EducationTransylvanian Symphony Foundation Inc: $500 · Arts & CultureMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $100 · Philanthropy
Other$78,975International$17,200Religion$5,600Education$3,100Arts & Culture$500Philanthropy$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKOMEO INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $13,100 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetSCORE INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $3,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIA CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN HANDS IN ACTION: $1,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMUSTARD SEED NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KOMEO INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SCORE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds INDIA CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN HANDS IN ACTION ↗
  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds P3 Israel ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds Transylvanian Symphony Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trevor Roberts Memorial Mission Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trevor Roberts Memorial Mission Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Trevor Roberts Memorial Mission’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home