Skip to content
Treasury Management Assoc of New York at a glance

· Public charity

Treasury Management Assoc of New York

The purpose of the organization is to keep its members current on the latest developments in the treasury management field.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$30kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kHuman Services$4kRecreation & Sports$3kCommunity Improvement$2kPhilanthropy$2kEducation$1kEnvironment$200Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$731k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MYOSITIS FOUNDATION$1,000
PROTECT US KIDS FOUNDATION$1,000
FORDHAM UNIV GABELLI$1,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOC (SARASOTA)$1,000
MARY CARIOLA CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MYOSITIS FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
VA
MD
NM
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
4
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
5
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
6
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
7
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
8
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
9
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
10
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
11
The Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc

The organization's exempt purpose is to raise funds to support charitable,educational & scientific purposes of its tax-exempt affiliate the hospital for special surgery, and other health care related charitable organizations.

Health
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Cancer Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Bear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation: $5,000 · HealthBear Necessities Pediatric Cancer FoundationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIAT…LIFE SCIENCE CARES INC: $3,000 · HealthLIFE SCIENCE CARES INCHealthwell Foundation: $2,500 · HealthHealthwell FoundationBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION+1 more: $500 · HealthDONATE LIFE AMERICA: $3,000 · OtherDONATE LIFE AMERICAMICHAEL J NISSENBLATT PARTNERS IN HEALING FOUNDATION: $3,000 · OtherMICHAEL J NISSENBLATT PART…MARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $1,000 · OtherMARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CE…PROTECT US KIDS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherPROTECT US KIDS FOUNDATIONUnited Way of Greater Houston: $1,500 · OtherUnited Way of Greater Hous…The Myositis Association: $1,000 · OtherThe Myositis Association+2 more: $400 · OtherHUNT MILITARY COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Public BenefitHUNT MILITAR…ROMY AND GABY SCI FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Public BenefitROMY AND GAB…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationFordham University: $1,000 · EducationNEW YORK EDGE INC: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsRAMSEY RESCUE SQUAD INC: $2,500 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE DOWNTOWN AMHERST FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Community Improvement
Health$19,500Other$10,900Public Benefit$5,000Education$3,500Recreation & Sports$3,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,500Community Improvement$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUNT MILITARY COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetDONATE LIFE AMERICA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE SCIENCE CARES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK EDGE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealthwell Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAMSEY RESCUE SQUAD INC: $2,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROMY AND GABY SCI FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DOWNTOWN AMHERST FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Myositis Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFordham University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS AND STRIPES INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…AbbVie FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodVanguard Charitable E…Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY14.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Treasury Management Assoc of New York funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Treasury Management Assoc of New York. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Downtown Amherst Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Treasury Management Assoc of New York?

Find your warmest path to Treasury Management Assoc of New York through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Treasury Management Assoc of New York’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home