· Public charity
Translifeline DBA Trans Lifeline
Trans Lifeline is a national trans-led 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to improving the quality of trans lives by responding to the critical needs of our community with direct service, material support, advocacy, and education.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of Translifeline DBA Trans Lifeline’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $119,400 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $489,197 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $369,797 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Transgender Law Center | $60,000 |
| Ctr for Transformative Action | $59,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION2× · 2021–2023 · $70k · revenue +43%
- OROPERATION RESTORATION2× · 2021–2022 · $43k · revenue +39%
- TYTransformations Youth Group2× · 2021–2022 · $37k · revenue +678%
Funded once
- CSCAKE SOCIETY COone grant, 2022 · $26k
- SASOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +156%
- FOFreedom Overground Corpone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Colectivo Intercultural TRANSgrediendo is a social organization, which works on the empowerment of human rights, access and comprehensive health care of TransGNB people, strengthening the social and cultural expression of diverse gender…
The Trans Women of Color Healing Project mission is to combat the erasure of Trans peoples' lives, narratives, and contributions to society. We speak truth to power and also uplift the stories that center TWOC people, our families, our…
To empower, promote, mentor and connect members of the American and global LGBTQIA communites, and especially members of those communities who identify as transgender, who are active in the film, television, content and media production…
Promote safety and education for transgender people in the usa and around the world
Gate is an international advocacy organization committed to promoting justice and equality for trans and gender diverse communities.
We are a group working to end Death by Incarceration also known as life without parole sentencing, build a pathway out of the prisons back to our communities through commutation reform, support successful possibilities for people formerly…
Advocates for trans equality fights for the legal and political rights of transgender people in america. leveraging decades of experience on the frontlines of power, we shift government and society towards a future where we are no less…
We manage a network of therapists specializing in gender, gender identity, and gender dysphoria.
The corporation helps atlanta's chronically homeless transgender and gender non-conforming people move from the streets into long-term housing and on to the lives they want to lead.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Transgender Resource Center of New Mexico and the most unlike its peers is Dave Purchase Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Transgender Law Center ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION ↗
- Who funds OPERATION RESTORATION ↗
- Who funds Transformations Youth Group ↗
- Who funds CAKE SOCIETY CO ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRANSGENDER RESOURCE CENTER OF NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds DAVE PURCHASE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SISTERREACH ↗
- Who funds THE TRANSLATIN COALITION ↗
- Who funds Transgender Advocates Knowledgeable Empowering ↗
- Who funds Miss Major and Alexander L Lees TGIJP ↗
- Who funds Metro Trans Umbrella Group ↗
- Who funds GALLERY AFERRO ↗
- Who funds Louisiana Trans Advocates Foundation ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW DEFENSE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY RELEASE FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Borealis Philanthropy · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Groundswell Fund · Proteus Fund Inc · The Astraea Foundation Inc · AIDS United · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Southern Vision Alliance · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Solidago Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Translifeline DBA Trans Lifeline funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.