How much did TRANSFORMING YOUTH RECOVERY grant in FY2019?

TRANSFORMING YOUTH RECOVERY reported 5 grants totaling $59,290 in its FY2019 IRS filing.

Where is TRANSFORMING YOUTH RECOVERY based?

TRANSFORMING YOUTH RECOVERY is based in NV.

TRANSFORMING YOUTH RECOVERY

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

TRANSFORMING YOUTH RECOVERY

To provide support for sobriety through collegiate recovery communities, k-12 elementary early prevention program, and development of a recovery resource data mapping platform for access to broad ranges of recovery resources.

$59k

Granted FY2019

Grants

Communities

$20k

Largest

01What you fund

0174% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2019.

Health$340kEducation$156kHuman Services$18kFood & Nutrition$10kCommunity Improvement$5kMembership Benefit$5kArts & Culture$5kOther$185k

02FY2019 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

Under $10k2 grants · $10k
$10k–50k3 grants · $40k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$173k

Total assets

Largest grants

MOTHERS AGAINST PRESCRIPTION DRUGS ABUSE$20,000
AMMON FOUNDATION$10,000
URBAN LOTUS PROJECT$10,000
WASHOE K-12 FOUNDATION$5,000
FRIENDS OF WASHOE COUNTY$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 11%. 34% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$395k · 4 repeat orgs$329k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$395k

$289k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%

+31%

Still filing today

75%

69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementMembership BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HAZELDEN BETTY FORD CENTER FOUNDATION - CO GREGORY FISHER
2× · 2017–2018 · $250k · revenue +24%
AO
ASSOCIATION OF RECOVERY IN HIGHER
2× · 2017–2018 · $70k · revenue +25%
WC
WASHOE COUNTY CO CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
3× · 2017–2019 · $50k

Funded once

EA
EDUCATION ALLIANCE OF WASHOE COUNTY
one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -40%
VO
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA - NORTHERN CA AND NEVADA
one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +31%
EA
ENCOMPASS ACADEMYgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $21k · revenue +111%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

University of Nevada Reno Foundation

To aid, support, & assist the University of Nevada, Reno to enhance the quality of education.

Education

University of Denver

A higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Education

Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education

National Association of College and

Advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—

Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The provision of education, research, and charitable patient care services.

Education

University Corporation for Atmospheric

University corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational activities, and of…

Science & Tech

North Dakota University System Foundation

The function of the north dakota university system foundation is to support, enrich, advance and improve higher education in the state of north dakota, and to assist its students, faculty and staff.

Philanthropy

Missouri Western State University

Promote private giving and help the university move into the forefront of public higher education.

—

The University Corporation San

University corporation serves as an auxiliary organization of san francisco state university.

Education

The University Foundation At Sacramento

The university foundation promotes philanthropy to provide a level of excellence at the university beyond what is possible through state funds.

Education

California State University East Bay

To provide services that aid, supplement, and advance the educational purposes of csu east bay.

Education

Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community College of Philadelphia and the most unlike its peers is Ammon Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2/36

the rest of the field

11%

206,162/1,819,529

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

24/28

Grantees still filing

20/28

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$340,000Other$185,000Education$155,896Human Services$17,860Food & Nutrition$10,000Community Improvement$5,100Membership Benefit$5,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern NevadaNV19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation TRANSFORMING YOUTH RECOVERY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ASSOCIATION OF RECOVERY IN HIGHER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 453845717 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ASSOCIATION OF RECOVERY IN HIGHER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 14% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Transforming Youth Recovery?

Find your warmest path to Transforming Youth Recovery through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

TRANSFORMING YOUTH RECOVERY

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Transforming Youth Recovery?

More from the funding graph

TRANSFORMING YOUTH RECOVERY

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Transforming Youth Recovery?

More from the funding graph