Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tramiel Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$259k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$487kEducation$377kPublic Safety & Disaster$336kReligion$304kArts & Culture$278kPhilanthropy$229kHealth$214kScience & Tech$69kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $235k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES$30,000
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$30,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$25,000
OSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$20,000
ISRAAID (US)$20,000
FOLDS OF HONOR$20,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$20,000
CHABAD OF PALO ALTO$15,000
FJC$15,000
BLUE STAR FAMILIES$10,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$10,000
JEWISH SILICON VALLEY$10,000
AMERICANS FOR BEN GURION UNIVERSITY$10,000
CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES$9,000
EXPLORATORIUM$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $319k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $31k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 10%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $20k → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $6k → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $6k → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $6k → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $6k → 7%JEWISH SILICON VALLEY: $10k → 8%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $6k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $30k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $25k → 10%JEWISH SILICON VALLEY: $10k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $25k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $20k → 10%JEWISH SILICON VALLEY: $10k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $20k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $20k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $18k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 72% of Tramiel Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 69% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 24%.

Tramiel Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 25 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
4

Total granted

$1.8M
$132k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+23%

Still filing today

36%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    9× · 2017–2025 · $268k · revenue +25%
  • OF
    OSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +16%
  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $160k · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • I
    ISRAALD
    one grant, 2022 · $60k
  • AA
    AMERICAN ASSOC BEN GURION UNIVERSIT
    one grant, 2017 · $27k
  • TP
    The Pentagon Federal Credit Union Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
7
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
American Society for Technion Israel Institute of Technology Inc

The american technion society supports the technion's critical research and (continued on sch o)

International
10
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
11
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
12
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Services; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN RED CROSS SILICON VALLEY: $184,575 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS SILICON VALLEYOSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $180,000 · OtherOSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERCHABAD OF PALO ALTO: $135,000 · OtherCHABAD OF PALO ALTOAMERICAN ASSOC BEN GURION UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOC BEN GURION UNIVERSITYISRAALD: $60,000 · OtherISRAALDJFCS: $60,000 · OtherJFCSIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $50,000 · OtherFJC: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $38,500 · Other+10 more: $237,000 · Other+10 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $217,260 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUST…FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $160,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOU…+1 more: $10,000 · EducationThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $268,250 · Arts & CultureThe United State…CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $41,500 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA ACADE…THE EXPLORATORIUM: $27,000 · Arts & CultureTHE EXPLORATORIU…JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $158,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY A…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $81,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nation…PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesPENINSULA VOLUN…JEWISH SILICON VALLEY: $30,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH SILICON …ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $70,000 · Public Safety & DisasterBLUE STAR FAMILIES INC: $60,000 · Public BenefitThe Pentagon Federal Credit Union Foundation: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,120,075Education$387,260Arts & Culture$336,750Human Services$319,000Public Safety & Disaster$70,000Public Benefit$60,000Recreation & Sports$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $268,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $217,260 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $180,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $158,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $81,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE STAR FAMILIES INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $50,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $41,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH SILICON VALLEY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EXPLORATORIUM: $27,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pentagon Federal Credit Union Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE STAR FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE EXPLORATORIUM ↗
  • Who funds The Pentagon Federal Credit Union Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tramiel Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tramiel Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tramiel Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Tramiel Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tramiel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph