Skip to content

· Private foundation

Trade Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$966k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.3MRecreation & Sports$705kHealth$251kHuman Services$151kReligion$97kYouth Development$29kEmployment$6kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $250k+2 grants · $950k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ECU Educational Foundation$700,000
Christ Covenant School$250,000
KRISTI OVERTON JOHNSON MINISTRIES INC$7,500
SON SET MINISTRIES INC$5,000
The Rogallo Foundation$2,500
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $15 → 11%BUILDING HOPE COMMUNITY LIFE CENTER: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MI
NY
MA
SD
IA
PA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 16 repeat orgs$584k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
76

Total granted

$2.0M
$331k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+25%

Still filing today

50%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $253k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $250k · revenue +145%
  • PC
    Pitt Community College Foundation Inc
    2× · 2019–2021 · $159k · revenue +29%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    3× · 2017–2023 · $20k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • PC
    PITT COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $203k
  • BC
    BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA INCORPORATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +66%
  • TR
    THE REFUGE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina College of Biblical Studies

Carolina college of biblical studies exists to disciple christ-followers, through biblical higher education, for a lifetime of effective servant leadership.

Education
2
The North Carolina Foundation for Christian Minist

To foster and promote christian stewardship and for promoting and providing support to the ministries in north carolina affiliated with or consistent with the convention of original free will baptists and other charitable, education,…

Religion
3
North Greenville University

North greenville university exists to glorify god by cultivating graduates who are equipped to serve as transformational leaders for church and society.

Education
4
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
5
Wilmington Christian School Inc

Wilmington christian school provides a christ-centered challenging academic program with instruction based on the biblical view of god and the world. wcs teaches, influences, and encourages each student to effectively integrate biblical…

Education
6
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
7
National Christian Foundation -- Wisconsin Inc

Equipping followers of christ to give wisely to advance his kingdom by inspiring biblical stewardship and generosity.

Religion
8
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

The corporation makes distributions to or for christian churches, ministries, and other charities

Philanthropy
9
Greater Greensboro Youth for Christ Inc

Yfc reaches young people everywhere, working together with the local church and other likeminded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to the word of god and prayer, passion for…

Youth Development
10
Foundation of the University of North Carolina At Charlotte

The foundation of unc charlotte receives contributions to promote and develop the academic and educational purpose of unc charlotte by providing support for operations, educational programs, and scholarships for the university and its…

—
11
Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Conquer cancer funds research for every type of cancer to benefit every patient, everywhere. working in collaboration with a global network of top scientists and clinicians, and leading advocacy and research organizations, conquer cancer…

Health
12
One Christian Academy Inc

The organization's mission is to educate elementary students through jesus christ-centered programs based on biblical truth and values, training and equipping them for a lifetime of learning, ledership, dedication, care for others, and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Eastern North Carolina; the most unlike its peers is National Caregiving Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ECU Educational Foundation: $1,383,379 · OtherECU Educational FoundationEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · OtherEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INCPITT COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $202,500 · OtherPITT COMMUNITY COLLEGEPitt Community College Foundation Inc: $159,400 · OtherPitt Community College Foundation Inc+74 more: $164,163 · Other+74 moreCHRIST COVENANT SCHOOL: $250,000 · EducationCHRIST COVE…GREENVILLE LEARNING CENTER: $11,200 · Education+2 more: $1,540 · EducationBAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA INCORPORATED: $100,000 · ReligionSON SET MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 · ReligionKRISTI OVERTON JOHNSON MINISTRIES: $12,500 · Religion+1 more: $40 · ReligionYOUNG LIFE: $20,200 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentROGALLO FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureBuilding Hope Community Life Center Inc: $1,000 · Human Services+2 more: $25 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN ACTION NETWORK: $25 · Public BenefitTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $12 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$2,159,442Education$262,740Religion$127,540Youth Development$22,200Arts & Culture$2,500Human Services$1,025Public Benefit$25Public Safety & Disaster$12

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetCHRIST COVENANT SCHOOL: $250,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetPitt Community College Foundation Inc: $159,400 over 2y, 12% of budgetBAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA INCORPORATED: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $20,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSON SET MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetKRISTI OVERTON JOHNSON MINISTRIES: $12,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetGREENVILLE LEARNING CENTER: $11,200 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJ H ROSE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION INC: $700 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST CAROLINA COUNCIL BSA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $12 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING HEROES NETWORK INC: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELP THE VETS INC: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED: $9 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST COVENANT SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Pitt Community College Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SON SET MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds KRISTI OVERTON JOHNSON MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds GREENVILLE LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROGALLO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN ↗
  • Who funds Building Hope Community Life Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF PITT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds J H ROSE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds EAST CAROLINA COUNCIL BSA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation IncNC26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Equitable Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · W Russell and Patricia Davis Duke Foundation Inc · University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Duke Energy Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trade Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trade Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Trade Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph