Skip to content
Toyota USA Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Toyota USA Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$49MCommunity Improvement$5.3MEmployment$4.4MFood & Nutrition$2.6MPhilanthropy$2.2MYouth Development$2.1MScience & Tech$1.4MArts & Culture$1.4MOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $34k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $799k
  • $250k+19 grants · $13M
$330,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$155M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,780,000
HUNTSVILLE-MADISON COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION$1,627,545
PONTOTOC CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$1,526,130
FULTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,515,448
EVSC FOUNDATION$1,036,854
SCOTT COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION$772,365
CHANDLER EDUCATION FOUNDATION$698,293
TEMPE IMPACTS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$599,276
TEXAS A AND M SAN ANTONIO INSTITUTE FOR SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS$569,376
YOUTH FIRST INC$483,695
EAST CENTRAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$334,223
NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILIES LEARNING$330,000
JUST ONE PROJECT$330,000
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION$318,700
BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC (FAYETTE EDUCATION)$307,142
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Hot Bread Kitchen Ltd: $550k → 17%Mississippi State University Foundation Inc: $175k → 24%National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity Education Foundation Inc: $350k → 9%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $125k → 17%VEHICLES FOR CHANGE INC: $50k → 11%HAWKEYE AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $55k → 9%VEHICLES FOR CHANGE: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
NV
IA
IN
PA
CA
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46M · 30 repeat orgs$25M to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
93

Total granted

$46M
$22M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+27%

Still filing today

70%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5.3M · revenue +4%
  • HM
    HUNTSVILLE MADISON COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5.3M · revenue +466% · 61% of their budget
  • Southern Methodist University
    5× · 2018–2023 · $5.0M · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • NG
    NORTH GIBSON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.7M · revenue -96% · 98% of their budget
  • AA
    ANN ARBOR HANDS-ON MUSEUM
    one grant, 2018 · $1.1M · revenue -5%
  • THE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
5
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
6
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
9
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
10
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
11
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
12
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 131 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

14
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
84/87
Grantees still filing
65/87
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,340,000 · EducationEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONSouthern Methodist University: $5,000,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist UniversityCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY DOMINGUEZ HILLS PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $4,150,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY DOMINGUEZ HILL…FULTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $3,613,461 · EducationFULTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCNORTH GIBSON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,708,255 · EducationNORTH GIBSON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILIES LEARNING INC: $1,100,000 · Education+21 more: $6,265,552 · Education+21 morePROJECT LEAD THE WAY INC: $2,500,000 · OtherPROJECT LEAD THE WAY INCSOUTHWEST ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,700,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATIONCHANDLER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,571,615 · OtherCHANDLER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCPONTOTOC CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,526,130 · OtherPONTOTOC CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTSCOTT COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION: $1,469,622 · OtherTHE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE: $1,000,000 · OtherNATIONAL MATH SCIENCE INITIATIVE: $1,000,000 · Other+76 more: $17,029,785 · Other+76 moreEVSC FOUNDATION INC: $3,782,563 · PhilanthropyEVSC FOUNDA…TEMPE IMPACTS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,232,292 · PhilanthropyTEMPE IMPAC…BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $971,689 · PhilanthropyBLUE GRASS …BEST ROBOTICS INC: $400,000 · PhilanthropyBEST ROBOTI…THE JUST ONE PROJECT: $330,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $350,000 · PhilanthropyHUNTSVILLE MADISON COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $5,255,837 · Community ImprovementLearning Undefeated Inc: $300,000 · Community ImprovementYOUTH FIRST: $1,257,497 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500,000 · HealthCHANDLER CARE CENTER CHILDRENS MEDICAL AND DENTAL CLINIC INC: $221,700 · Health+1 more: $68,000 · HealthHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $550,000 · Human ServicesNational Alliance for Partnerships In Equity Education Foundation Inc: $350,000 · Human ServicesMississippi State University Foundation Inc: $175,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesVEHICLES FOR CHANGE INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesHAWKEYE AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesANN ARBOR HANDS-ON MUSEUM: $1,100,000 · Arts & CultureCLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV INC: $250,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$27,177,268Other$27,797,152Philanthropy$7,066,544Community Improvement$5,555,837Health$2,047,197Human Services$1,355,000Arts & Culture$1,350,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,340,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetHUNTSVILLE MADISON COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $5,255,837 over 3y, 61% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $5,000,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY DOMINGUEZ HILLS PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $4,150,000 over 3y, 51% of budgetEVSC FOUNDATION INC: $3,782,563 over 3y, 47% of budgetFULTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $3,613,461 over 2y, 89% of budgetNORTH GIBSON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,708,255 over 1y, 98% of budgetCHANDLER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,571,615 over 2y, 42% of budgetYOUTH FIRST: $1,257,497 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetTEMPE IMPACTS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,232,292 over 3y, 80% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILIES LEARNING INC: $1,100,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetANN ARBOR HANDS-ON MUSEUM: $1,100,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetTHE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE: $1,000,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $971,689 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCommunity Transportation Association of America: $901,895 over 2y, 17% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $669,262 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEW TEACHER CENTER: $591,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTexas A&M-San Antonio Institute for School and Community Partnerships: $569,376 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $550,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSHIFT EDUCATION: $529,500 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC: $500,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetNATIONAL DROPOUT PREVENTION NETWORK: $500,000 over 1y, 46% of budget114th Partnership Inc: $500,000 over 1y, 88% of budgetSKILLSUSA FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROBIN MERGER CORPORATION INC: $485,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBEST ROBOTICS INC: $400,000 over 1y, 69% of budgetMOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $394,320 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetClaremont Graduate University: $365,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNational Alliance for Partnerships In Equity Education Foundation Inc: $350,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetPER SCHOLAS INC: $350,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $342,614 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $318,700 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $280,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUnited Food Bank: $255,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPRICHARD COMMITTEE FOR ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE INC: $250,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetNational 4-H Council: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSCI-TECH DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $250,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetNATIONAL MATH & SCIENCE INITIATIVE INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHANDLER CARE CENTER CHILDRENS MEDICAL AND DENTAL CLINIC INC: $221,700 over 2y, 21% of budgetNATIVE HEALTH: $220,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLINCOLN COUNTY R-III EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 55% of budgetMerit Network Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKettering University: $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSCIENCE BUDDIES: $200,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetSOMERSET ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 60% of budgetLINCOLN FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $181,470 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings F…Centerpoint Energy Fo…The Gap FoundationCommunity Foundation …Ford PhilanthropyUnited Way for Southe…Dollar General Litera…DTE Energy FoundationBoys & Girls Clubs of…The Martin Family Fou…James Graham Brown Fo…United Way of Washten…
Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO18× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · The Gap Foundation · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Ford Philanthropy · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · The Martin Family Foundation · James Graham Brown Foundation Inc · United Way of Washtenaw County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Toyota USA Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Toyota USA Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Vehicles for Change Inc: 16% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 131 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Toyota USA’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home