Skip to content

· Private foundation

Touma Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$116kArts & Culture$46kHealth$32kPhilanthropy$29kReligion$17kHousing & Shelter$11kRecreation & Sports$4kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$908k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$18,000
HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART$5,000
UNITED WAY$5,000
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$5,000
WING2WING FOUNDATION$5,000
STUDIO THEATER$2,500
FAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATION OF WV$2,000
NATIONAL CATHEDRAL SCHOOL$1,500
CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,500
ST PATRICK'S EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL$1,000
NATIONAL HOMELESSNESS LAW CENTER$1,000
CITY OF HUNTINGTON FOUNDATION$600
LOVELAND FOUNDATION$500
MADERIA FOUNDATION$500
SAVE THE CHILDREN FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CABELL HUNTINGTON COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $3k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$250k · 19 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
8

Total granted

$250k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-8%

Still filing today

53%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthEducationInternationalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    5× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +159%
  • HM
    HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $36k · revenue +22%
  • CH
    CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $17k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • AF
    AAO-HNS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • CC
    CABELL-HUNTINGTON COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -8%
  • HC
    Huntington Children's Museum Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Huntington Foundation
Philanthropy
2
The Huntington-Akron Foundation
Philanthropy
3
The Hunt Family Foundation
—
4
Hunt Family Foundation
—
5
The Huntington Foundation Inc
—
6
The Huntsman Foundation
—
7
Harrison County Community Hospital Foundation Inc

Recognizing the importance of Harrison County Community Hospital District d/b/a Harrison County Community Hospital ("HCCH"), and believing that it exemplifies the highest goals and standards of health care, the Harrison County Community…

Philanthropy
8
John Huntington Fund for Education
—
9
The Hastings Foundation
Education
10
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
11
The Cultural Foundation of Harrison County Inc

Provide direct financial support to agencies, organizations and governmental units in support of the fine arts in harrison county, wv

—
12
Northern Virginia Health Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cabell Huntington Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Wing 2 Wing Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $105,000 · EducationMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATEDUNITED WAY: $17,500 · OtherUNITED WAYHOLY SPIRIT CHURCH: $14,500 · OtherHOLY SPIRIT CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST PATRICKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $8,000 · OtherST PATRICKS EPISCOPAL CHURCHFAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATION OF WV: $6,000 · OtherFAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATION OF WVAAO-HNS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherAAO-HNS FOUNDATIONCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $5,000 · OtherCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INCGREATER HUNTINGTON PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT: $4,000 · OtherMADERIA FOUNDATION: $3,000 · OtherNATIONAL HOMELESSNESS LAW CENTER: $3,000 · OtherPROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL FOUNDATION OF THE D OF C: $3,000 · Other+7 more: $7,800 · Other+7 moreHUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $35,500 · Arts & CultureHUNTINGTON MUSEUM…The Studio Theatre Inc: $5,500 · Arts & CultureThe Studio Theatr…Huntington Children's Museum Inc: $1,500 · Arts & CultureCABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $16,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 · HealthTHE WING 2 WING FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyHERITAGE FARM FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyCity of Huntington Foundation Inc: $600 · PhilanthropyCABELL-HUNTINGTON COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 · InternationalTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Civil Rights
Education$105,000Other$87,300Arts & Culture$42,500Health$18,500Philanthropy$11,600Human Services$3,000International$1,000Civil Rights$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $105,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $35,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $16,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WING 2 WING FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATION OF WV: $6,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetThe Studio Theatre Inc: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCABELL-HUNTINGTON COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFACING HUNGER FOODBANK INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHuntington Children's Museum Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHERITAGE FARM FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCity of Huntington Foundation Inc: $600 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetHOSPICE OF HUNTINGTON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WING 2 WING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY MEDICINE FOUNDATION OF WV ↗
  • Who funds The Studio Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds CABELL-HUNTINGTON COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds FACING HUNGER FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Huntington Children's Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE FARM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds City of Huntington Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF HUNTINGTON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the Tri-State Community IncKY20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Tri-State Community Inc · The Huntington Foundation Inc · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Marshall Health Network Inc · Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo · The Strong-Treister Family Foundation · Arthur and Joan Weisberg Family Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation · Peoples Bank Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Touma Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Touma Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Touma Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Touma Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Touma’s filings →

More from the funding graph