Skip to content

· Private foundation

Torgerson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$994k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$185k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.3MHuman Services$1.3MArts & Culture$705kHousing & Shelter$438kCrime & Legal$312kReligion$271kYouth Development$241kHealth$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $81k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $894k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERFAITH OUTREACH & COMMUNITY PARTNERS$185,000
NORWAY HOUSE$130,000
NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENTS ZONE$124,200
CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION$100,000
KITE FOUNDATION$80,000
HEROS AND HORSES$75,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION$50,000
BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING$50,000
WAYZATA COMMUNITY CHURCH$36,000
BOULDER OPTIONS$25,000
SAINT JOHN'S SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY$10,000
HENNING ROD AND GUN CLUB$10,000
RAKHMA PEACE HOME$5,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HEROS AND HORSES: $75k → 10%HEROS AND HORSES: $25k → 10%HEROS AND HORSES: $25k → 10%HEROS AND HORSES: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 20 repeat orgs$177k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
9

Total granted

$5.6M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+4%

Still filing today

65%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IO
    INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +58%
  • NH
    Norway House
    5× · 2020–2024 · $705k · revenue +7%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2023 · $630k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • Y
    YWCA
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • TI
    TREEHOUSE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -6%
  • S
    SAVE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
2
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
3
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
4
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health
5
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
6
Veap Inc

VEAP is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, multi-service, human service organization with the mission of "Together, we create pathways to stronger, more hopeful, communities through access to healthy food, housing stability and supportive services."

—
7
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
8
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
9
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
10
The Bakken

The bakken museum inspires a passion for innovation by exploring the potential for science, technology, and the humanities to make the world a better place.

Arts & Culture
11
The Minneapolis Foundation

The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…

Philanthropy
12
Reach for Resources Inc

Empowering people of all abilities to reach their full potential. we provide individualized services that maximize independence, boosts community engagement and improves physical and emotional well-being.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners; the most unlike its peers is Heroes and Horses Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $1,120,400 · OtherINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERSUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $825,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATIONCRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $775,000 · OtherCRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLWayzata Community Church: $271,000 · OtherWayzata Community Church+17 more: $331,474 · Other+17 moreUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $630,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MI…Bolder Options: $230,500 · EducationBolder Options+2 more: $11,500 · EducationNorway House: $705,000 · Arts & CultureNorway HouseBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE: $432,000 · Community ImprovementNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $311,700 · Crime & LegalHEROES AND HORSES INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesRAKHMA INC: $18,000 · HealthTREEHOUSE INC: $5,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $2,500 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthARNOLD S LEONARD CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $1,000 · Health
Other$3,322,874Education$872,000Arts & Culture$705,000Community Improvement$432,000Crime & Legal$311,700Human Services$150,000Health$27,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $1,120,400 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetNorway House: $705,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $630,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE: $432,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $311,700 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetBolder Options: $230,500 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetHEROES AND HORSES INC: $150,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetVENN FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetRAKHMA INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGROVES ACADEMY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cookie Cart: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRebuilding Together - Twin Cities: $6,250 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTREEHOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEST CHRISTMAS EVER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEASE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARNOLD S LEONARD CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds Norway House ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE ↗
  • Who funds Bolder Options ↗
  • Who funds HEROES AND HORSES INC ↗
  • Who funds PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VENN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAKHMA INC ↗
  • Who funds GROVES ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds The Cookie Cart ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together - Twin Cities ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST CHRISTMAS EVER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds PEASE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARNOLD S LEONARD CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN26.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · United Way Worldwide · The US Charitable Gift Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Torgerson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Torgerson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Torgerson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph