Skip to content
Tomchei Torah B'Eretz Yisrael Inc Tomchei Torah B'Eret at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Tomchei Torah B'Eretz Yisrael Inc Tomchei Torah B'Eret

The organization will provide grants & financial support to other recognized non profit entities for programs that serve & support students pursuing their religious studies in america and abroad.

$13M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$13M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$58MReligion$219kPhilanthropy$9k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
  • $250k+1 grant · $13M
$37,150
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIH MEMORIAL GRANT FUND$12,910,000
Individual grant recipient$37,150
KOLLEL ZICHRON MENACHEM$19,450
BAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON: $10k → 16%YESHIVAT SHAALVIM: $14k → 6%BAIS MEDRASH HEICHAL DOVID: $10k → 13%CONGREGATION MEADOW ESTATES: $74k → 14%YESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $85k → 17%YESHIVA SHAAR HAMELECH: $38k → 20%BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA: $11k → 11%MESIVTA ATERES YAAKOV: $10k → 6%YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH: $8k → 13%KOLLEL ZICHRON MENACHEM: $19k → 14%YESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $56k → 17%CONG YESHIVAS MEOR HACHAIM: $23k → 20%BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA: $6k → 11%LEV LALEV: $9k → 14%YESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $28k → 17%SEMINAR JERUSALEM: $13k → 20%SEMINAR JERUSALEM: $9k → 20%OR HATALMUD INC: $8k → 20%YESHIVA SHAAR HAMELECH: $37k → 20%YESHIVA SHAAR HAMELECH: $9k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58M · 5 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +318% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$58M
$193k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+318%
+22%

Still filing today

40%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LM
    LIH MEMORIAL GRANT FUND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $58M · revenue +318% · 100% of their budget
  • YU
    YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $169k · revenue +62%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2024 · $46k

Funded once

  • CM
    CONG MEADOW ESTATES
    one grant, 2020 · $74k
  • CS
    CONG SHAAR HAMELECH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $38k
  • CY
    CONG YESHIVAS MEOR HACHAIM
    one grant, 2023 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIH MEMORIAL GRANT FUND: $57,661,643 · EducationLIH MEMORIAL GRANT FUND+2 more: $178,690 · EducationCONG MEADOW ESTATES: $74,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $46,100 · OtherCONG SHAAR HAMELECH INC: $37,610 · OtherCONG YESHIVAS MEOR HACHAIM: $22,525 · OtherSEMINAR YERUSHALAYIM-AMERICAN ASSEMBLY: $21,950 · OtherZICHRON MENACHEM INC: $19,450 · OtherBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF AMERICA: $16,300 · OtherYESHIVAT SHAALVIM INC: $14,400 · OtherMESIVTA ATERES YAAKOV OF GREATER LONG ISLAND: $10,000 · OtherBEIS MEDRASH HEICHAL DOVID: $9,875 · Other+2 more: $15,470 · OtherLEV LALEV INC: $9,300 · Philanthropy
Education$57,840,333Other$287,680Philanthropy$9,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIH MEMORIAL GRANT FUND: $57,661,643 over 8y, 100% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $168,690 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLEV LALEV INC: $9,300 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIH MEMORIAL GRANT FUND ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds LEV LALEV INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundMorgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ojc FundNY15.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tomchei Torah B'Eretz Yisrael Inc Tomchei Torah B'Eret funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tomchei Torah B'Eretz Yisrael Inc Tomchei Torah B'Eret. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Bais Yaakov of Boston Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tomchei Torah B'Eretz Yisrael Inc Tomchei Torah B'Eret?

Find your warmest path to Tomchei Torah B'Eretz Yisrael Inc Tomchei Torah B'Eret through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tomchei Torah B'Eretz Yisrael Inc Tomchei Torah B'Eret’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home