Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tom S & Marye Kate Aldridge Charitable & Educational Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$518kHealth$237kInternational$60kHousing & Shelter$21kCrime & Legal$13kHuman Services$10kRecreation & Sports$5kArts & Culture$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $750
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $80k
$13,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOME INTEGRATION INC$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION$13,500
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION$13,200
CAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION$13,000
SANTA ROSA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$10,000
LONE OAK AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
NAVARRE HIGH CROSS COUNTRY$700
NORMAN DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $143k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 16%HOME INTEGRATION INC: $22k → 19%HOME INTEGRATION INC: $20k → 19%HOME INTEGRATION INC: $20k → 19%HOME INTEGRATION INC: $20k → 19%HOME INTEGRATION INC: $20k → 19%HOME INTEGRATION INC: $20k → 19%HOME INTEGRATION INC: $20k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$826k · 16 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$826k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+32%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HOME INTEGRATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $142k · revenue +27%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $113k · revenue +55%
  • CK
    CAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • A
    AHERO
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • TT
    THE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • HM
    HORACE MANN ELEMENTARY PTA
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
2
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
3
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
4
Opportunity Scholarship Fund

The Opportunity Scholarship Fund is a scholarship granting organization that provides scholarships to Oklahoma prek-12 students to attend accredited private schools in our state. Once a student has received a scholarship, that student and…

Education
5
Leadership Oklahoma Inc

Leadership oklahoma was organized to create, inspire, and support a dynamic network of leaders whose increased awareness and commitement to service will energize oklahomans to shape oklahoma's future.

Public Benefit
6
University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma Foundation Inc

The purpose of the USAO Foundation is to support the mission of the University of Science & Arts of Oklahoma.

Education
7
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Oklahoma Single Parent Scholarship Program

Provides financial support, scholarships, and encouragement to low-income single parents pursuing postsecondary education. By helping them stay in school and complete degrees, the program empowers families to achieve self-sufficiency,…

Education
9
Northwestern Oklahoma State University Foundation Inc and Alumni Association

To provide support to NWOSU and scholarships to NWOSU students

Education
10
Oklahoma Academy for State Goals

To provide information to citizens. The organization encourages the utilization and developement of the State of Oklahomas resourses.

—
11
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
12
Oklahoma Association of Insurance Agents

Provides education and certification programs for independent insurance agents

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oklahoma Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Home Integration Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $149,850 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION: $113,120 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATIONOklahoma State University Foundation: $46,000 · EducationOklahoma State University FoundationRogers State University Foundation: $34,000 · EducationRogers State University Foundation+1 more: $200 · EducationNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT: $60,000 · OtherNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DEVELO…LONE OAK PUBLIC LIBRARY: $51,000 · OtherLONE OAK PUBLIC LIBRARYLONE OAK AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $41,000 · OtherLONE OAK AREA PUBLIC LIBRARYOKLAHOMA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC: $13,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATIO…AHERO: $10,000 · OtherSANTA ROSA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherCENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT: $10,000 · OtherTHE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Other+9 more: $12,150 · Other+9 moreHOME INTEGRATION INC: $142,000 · Human ServicesHOME INTEGRATION I…+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesCAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $85,400 · Youth DevelopmentCAVETT KIDS…TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN: $51,000 · Crime & LegalLead Learn Live Corp: $15,000 · HealthBrevard Rescue Mission Inc: $10,100 · Housing & Shelter
Education$343,170Other$217,150Human Services$142,500Youth Development$85,400Crime & Legal$51,000Health$15,000Housing & Shelter$10,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $149,850 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOME INTEGRATION INC: $142,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION: $113,120 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $85,400 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetTSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN: $51,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $46,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRogers State University Foundation: $34,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLead Learn Live Corp: $15,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBrevard Rescue Mission Inc: $10,100 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOME INTEGRATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Rogers State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Lead Learn Live Corp ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Brevard Rescue Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA9.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom S & Marye Kate Aldridge Charitable & Educational Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom S & Marye Kate Aldridge Charitable & Educational Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Rogers State University Foundation: 20% of income from government
  • Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tom S & Marye Kate Aldridge Charitable & Educational Trust?

Find your warmest path to Tom S & Marye Kate Aldridge Charitable & Educational Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tom S & Marye Kate Aldridge Charitable & Educational’s filings →

More from the funding graph