Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tom L Ward Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$3.3MHousing & Shelter$861kHealth$192kEducation$117kHuman Services$76kPhilanthropy$5kMembership Benefit$2kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $129k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.5M
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SKYLINE CHURCH$1,020,000
WHITE FIELDS INC$500,000
MAYO CLINIC$129,000
OKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
INTERNATIONAL REFORMED BAPTIST SEMINARY (IRBS)$1,000
RICHMOND COUNTRY CHURCH$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
WINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY$1,000
CENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
CJD FOUNDATION$1,000
THE ROC YOUTH PROGRAM$1,000
CHILDRENS HEART FOUNDATION$1,000
JAROLD CALLAHAN LASTING LEGACY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BOYS & GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON: $5k → 16%CALM WATERS: $10k → 16%WINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 5 repeat orgs$553k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$4.0M
$540k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-6%

Still filing today

20%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SKYLINE CHURCH
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3.3M
  • WF
    White Fields Inc
    2× · 2022–2024 · $510k · revenue -49%
  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $189k

Funded once

  • THE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $350k · revenue -6%
  • TS
    THE SARAH STITT HOPE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -22% · 27% of their budget
  • FO
    FIELDS OF HOPE
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
2
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter
3
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
4
Oklahoma Connections Academy Inc

Oklahoma connections inc, a public charter school, uses the connections curriculum to offer oklahoma students in grades k-12 an exceptional learning experience.

Education
5
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
6
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
7
Oklahoma Christian Academy Inc

Establish, maintain, and conduct a school for the instruction and training of youth.

Education
8
Neighborhood Housing Services Oklahoma City Inc

To increase the availability of affordable, safe housing options for low-to-moderate income families, by providing assistance to those who wish to become renters or homeowners through a variety of wealth-building programs.

Housing & Shelter
9
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
10
Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
11
Shelterwell Inc

Shelterwell fosters a spirit of connected community, centered on the belief that housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
12
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is White Fields Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SKYLINE CHURCH: $3,270,000 · OtherSKYLINE CHURCHWhite Fields Inc: $510,000 · OtherWhite Fields IncMAYO CLINIC: $189,000 · Other+16 more: $101,000 · OtherTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $350,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE SARAH STITT HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationCALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesWINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$4,070,000Housing & Shelter$351,000Education$101,000Human Services$16,000Philanthropy$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $350,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE SARAH STITT HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetOKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS21.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Wegener Foundation Inc · Love Meyer Family Foundation · The Magnolia Charitable Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · The New Horizons Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · The Signatry Charitable Trust · McLaughlin Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom L Ward Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom L Ward Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tom L Ward Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tom L Ward Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tom L Ward Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph