Skip to content
Tom & Marilyn Moyer Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Tom & Marilyn Moyer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.5MEducation$1.3MHuman Services$950kPhilanthropy$750kHousing & Shelter$500kEmployment$500kYouth Development$400kArts & Culture$100k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.2M
$400,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION$500,000
SAN DIEGO SENIORS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500,000
COMPREHENSIVE LIFE RESOURCES$400,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN$400,000
KELLIN FOUNDATION$400,000
COLUMBIA RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM$100,000
BRIDGE THE GAP$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $900k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAN DIEGO SENIORS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500k → 11%KELLIN FOUNDATION: $400k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
2
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
3
Columbia River Mental Health Services

Columbia river mental health services is a full service mental health agency offering a wide spectrum of behavioral health services to children and adults of clark county, washington.

Health
4
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
5
Sarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation Inc

Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation is the philanthropic partner that helps sarasota memorial health care system bring world-class care to our community.

Health
6
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
7
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
8
Children and Youth Justice Center

The center for children & youth justice was founded in 2006 with one mission: reform the child welfare and juvenile justice systems to improve the lives of generations of children and youth in washington state. our focus is large-scale,…

Crime & Legal
9
United States Center for Safesport

With the goal of ensuring athletes within the u.s. olympic and paralympic movement of are safe, supported, and strengthened. the center: delivers comprehensive abuse prevention education within and outside of the u.s. olympic and…

Recreation & Sports
10
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
11
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
12
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Angels of America's Fallen; the most unlike its peers is Bridge the Gap Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
3/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S CENTER: $500,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S CENTERCOTTAGE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL: $500,000 · OtherCOTTAGE REHABILITATION HOSPITALFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $400,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE CHILDRENDE LA SALLE NORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $275,000 · OtherDE LA SALLE NORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHO…COLUMBIA RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM: $100,000 · Other+3 more: $117,894 · Other+3 moreSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $500,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNN…Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation: $500,000 · EducationChildren of Fallen …SAN DIEGO SENIORS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 · Human ServicesSAN DIEGO SENIORS…KELLIN FOUNDATION: $400,000 · Human ServicesKELLIN FOUNDATIONMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION: $500,000 · PhilanthropyMIKEROWEWORKS …SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $250,000 · PhilanthropySANTA BARBARA …OPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES: $500,000 · Housing & ShelterOPEN HOUS…ANGELS OF AMERICA'S FALLEN: $500,000 · Crime & LegalANGELS OF…COMPREHENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY: $400,000 · Health
Other$1,892,894Education$1,000,000Human Services$900,000Philanthropy$750,000Housing & Shelter$500,000Crime & Legal$500,000Health$400,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN DIEGO SENIORS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER: $500,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetOPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES: $500,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation: $500,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetANGELS OF AMERICA'S FALLEN: $500,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY: $400,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetKELLIN FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOLUMBIA RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBRIDGE THE GAP MINISTRIES: $50,000 over 1y, 29% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

M J Murdock Charitabl…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
M J Murdock Charitable TrustWA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: M J Murdock Charitable Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom & Marilyn Moyer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom & Marilyn Moyer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Columbia River Maritime Museum: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tom & Marilyn Moyer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tom & Marilyn Moyer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tom & Marilyn Moyer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home