Skip to content
Todd S Greenberg Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Todd S Greenberg Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$200
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$59kPhilanthropy$11kEducation$10kReligion$10kPublic Benefit$3kArts & Culture$1kYouth Development$1kHuman Services$450Other$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
2
States reached
$87k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$100
Jewish Childrens Service Organizati$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 42% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Jewish Childrens Service Organizati: $100 → 8%William C Barowsky Memorial: $100 → 17%Jefferson Hospital: $100 → 22%Prostate Cancer Foundation: $5k → 14%Solomon Schechter of Nassau County: $100 → 6%Tunnels to Towers: $5k → 11%American-Israel Cultural Foundation: $100 → 17%Treasure Coast Hospice: $100 → 10%Men Giving Back: $3k → 11%YMCA Camp Ingersoll: $100 → 7%Shatterproof: $10k → 9%NCCJ: $3k → 11%UCONN Foundation: $100 → 11%Temple Beth Sholom: $50 → 12%St Judes: $300 → 17%Rock Steady Boxing: $5k → 16%Jewish United Fund: $50 → 14%American Diabetes: $50 → 7%Chabad of the Valley: $3k → 14%Men Giving Back: $2k → 11%Shatterproof: $5k → 9%Jewish Federation of Greater Hartford: $5k → 11%Alzheimer's Association: $100 → 14%Prostate Cancer Foundation: $200 → 14%Armory Art Center: $100 → 11%Jewish Federation of Greater Hartford: $3k → 11%Chabad of the Valley: $2k → 14%Alpert Jewish Family Services: $50 → 11%Jewish Federation of Greater Hartford: $3k → 11%Pancreatic Cancer Action Network: $100 → 14%The Winning Round Foundation Inc: $10k → 11%Hebrew Senior Care: $2k → 11%The Winning Round Foundation Inc: $5k → 11%Jewish Foundation of Greater Hartford: $100 → 11%Beth El Temple: $100 → 11%Chabad of the Farmington Valley: $3k → 11%Chabad of the Farmington Valley: $2k → 11%Connecticut Childrens Medical Center: $8k → 11%Connecticut Childrens Medical Center: $3k → 11%Hartford Foundation for Public Giving: $1k → 11%Capitol Squash: $1k → 11%CT Children's Foundation: $100 → 11%CT Children's Foundation: $100 → 11%CSZ Foundation Inc: $5k → 11%CSZ Foundation Inc: $2k → 11%CSZ Foundation Inc: $2k → 11%CSZ Foundation Inc: $500 → 11%CSZ Foundation Inc: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
CA
VA
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$70k · 11 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
25

Total granted

$70k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+38%

Still filing today

55%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2020–2023 · $11k · revenue +57%
  • CF
    CSZ FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +154%
  • PC
    PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2023 · $5k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • RS
    ROCK STEADY BOXING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +51%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +50%
  • N
    NCCJ
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Hebrew Health Care Foundation Inc

Managing endowment funds for hebrew health care and affiliates.

—
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hartford Foundation for Public Giving; the most unlike its peers is Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $15,000 · HealthSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $10,563 · HealthCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTERCSZ FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthCSZ FOUNDATION INCHEBREW HOME & HOSPITAL: $2,000 · Health+4 more: $625 · HealthWINNING ROUND FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · OtherWINNING ROUND FOUNDATION INCCHABAD OF THE VALLEY INC: $5,000 · OtherCHABAD OF THE VALLEY INCIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD OF THE FARMINGTON VALLEY INC: $4,500 · OtherCHABAD OF THE FARMINGTON VALLEY INCNCCJ: $2,500 · OtherNCCJ+16 more: $2,375 · Other+16 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD: $10,150 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION …PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,200 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FO…HARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING: $1,000 · PhilanthropyHARTFORD FOUNDATIO…+1 more: $50 · PhilanthropyROCK STEADY BOXING INC: $5,000 · EducationROCK STEADY…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SIL…+2 more: $150 · EducationCapitol Squash Inc: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE ARMORY ART CENTER INC: $100 · Arts & CultureAMERICA-ISRAEL CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC: $100 · Arts & Culture
Health$38,188Other$33,875Philanthropy$16,400Education$10,150Recreation & Sports$1,000Arts & Culture$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $10,563 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD: $10,150 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCSZ FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCK STEADY BOXING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW HOME & HOSPITAL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCapitol Squash Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARMORY ART CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF NASSAU COUNTY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA-ISRAEL CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRENBROOK SCHOOL INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation f…The Carla and Stephen…Cheryl Chase & Stuart…Jewish Community Foun…Aetna Foundation IncMorgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…
Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Carla and Stephen Schwartz Family Foundation Inc · Cheryl Chase & Stuart Bear Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Hartford Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Todd S Greenberg Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Todd S Greenberg Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center: 5% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • The Armory Art Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Todd S Greenberg’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home