Skip to content

· Private foundation

Todd Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$655k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$323k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$363kEnvironment$327kArts & Culture$77kHealth$7kHousing & Shelter$5kYouth Development$4kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $250k+2 grants · $643k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Northern Colo Foundat$323,000
Poudre Learning Center Fdn$320,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Greeley Chorale$3,000
Community Foundation$2,000
Colorado Humanities$1,000
Longs Peak Council - Boy Scouts$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $550) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%A Woman's Place: $300 → 9%A Woman's Place: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$462k · 13 repeat orgs$330k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2022, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$462k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+668%

Still filing today

38%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $320k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GREELEY CHORALE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $18k · revenue +4%
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7k · revenue +185%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $6k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • M
    Miscellaneous
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • NC
    Northern Colorado Astronomical Soci
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • SD
    ST DOMINIC VILLAGE
    one grant, 2017 · $300 · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Historical Foundation

To mobilize resources to support and inspire colorado's people in their presesrvation of meaningful places, heritage, and history.

—
2
Colorado Community College System Foundation

To support the mission of the colorado community college system by creating partnerships, developing resources, and advocating for the value of a community college education.

Education
3
The Colorado Parks Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
4
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
5
Cu Foundation Holdings Inc

To receive and manage gifts of real estate for the benefit of the university of colorado foundation.

—
6
Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center Foundation

Manage certain assets for the benefit of the colorado springs finearts center at colorado college.

Arts & Culture
7
Colorado Springs Philharmonic Foundation

To raise funds and acquire assets, both real and personal, that will provide financial assistance to the Colorado Springs Philharmonic Orchestra.

Arts & Culture
8
Credit Union of Colorado Foundation

To provide grants, fundraising, and encouraging volunteerism in support of local charities. the foundation will focus its support on education and human services.

Philanthropy
9
Col Foundation

The preservation of open space in colorado by supporting the operations of colorado open lands. the organization holds stewardship funds for the monitoring and enforcement of conservation easements held by colorado open lands.

Environment
10
Red Rocks Community College Foundation

The foundation's mission is support red rocks community college in its commitment to students, learning and excellence.

—
11
Urban Land Conservancy

Urban land conservancy's mission is to acquire, develop, and/or preserve community assets in urban areas for a variety of community needs especially in high poverty, low-income, underserved, at-risk communities.

Community Improvement
12
Colorado School of Mines Foundation

To support the university, its academic programs, and its students, and to foster alumni relations. see schedule o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Humanities; the most unlike its peers is A Woman's Place Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Northern Colo Foundat: $352,775 · OtherUniversity of Northern Colo FoundatCommunity Foundation: $28,250 · OtherCommunity FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $26,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREELEY CHORALE INC: $17,820 · Other+8 more: $27,415 · Other+8 morePOUDRE LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION I: $320,000 · EnvironmentPOUDRE LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION IROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY: $7,400 · Recreation & SportsUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $6,360 · EducationSt Mary's Catholic Education Foundation: $300 · EducationCOLORADO HUMANITIES: $5,000 · Arts & CultureA WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED: $550 · Human Services
Other$452,260Environment$320,000Recreation & Sports$7,400Education$6,660Arts & Culture$5,000Human Services$550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREELEY CHORALE INC: $17,820 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY: $7,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $6,360 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO HUMANITIES: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetA WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST DOMINIC VILLAGE: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Mary's Catholic Education Foundation: $300 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds POUDRE LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION I ↗
  • Who funds GREELEY CHORALE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO HUMANITIES ↗
  • Who funds A WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ST DOMINIC VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds St Mary's Catholic Education Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Todd Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Todd Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Todd Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph