Skip to content

· Private foundation

Todd a Williams Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$186k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.0MCommunity Improvement$528kPhilanthropy$400kEmployment$178kHealth$60kPublic Benefit$38kYouth Development$34kArts & Culture$32kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$714k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BONTON FARMS$100,000
UNITED TO LEARN$50,000
STARFISH$18,927
THE GOODNESS WEB FOUNDATION$10,000
TEXAS WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY$3,000
BISHOP DUNNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$2,500
Individual grant recipient$600
MEDRANO JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%JONATHAN'S PLACE: $5k → 14%JONATHAN'S PLACE: $3k → 14%ON THE ROAD LENDING: $6k → 14%CITY SQUARE: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
IN
OH
CA
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 31 repeat orgs$486k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
71

Total granted

$1.5M
$470k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+10%

Still filing today

71%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AUSTIN COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $346k · revenue +12%
  • UT
    UNITED TO LEARN
    7× · 2018–2024 · $117k · revenue +558%
  • C
    COMMIT2DALLAS
    4× · 2017–2021 · $103k · revenue +335%

Funded once

  • TW
    TEXAS WOMANS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • S
    SCHOLARSHOTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +75%
  • JF
    JOINED FOR GOOD INC DBA BRACKETS FOR GOOD
    one grant, 2017 · $29k · revenue -100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
2
The Royal School System

The mission of Royal Public Schools is to spark students' natural curiosity and love of learning while providing the knowledge and skills they need to lead successful and fulfilling lives.

Education
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
5
Progress Texas

Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.

Civil Rights
6
Trellis Foundation

We believe every texas student deserves the opportunity to earn a postsecondary credential or degree that helps them achieve the future they envision for themselves and their families. we invest in the programs, practices, and policies…

Human Services
7
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
8
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
9
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
10
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
11
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
12
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latinos for Education Inc; the most unlike its peers is Paisley's Pals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
69/74
Grantees still filing
46/74
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DAW DONOR ADVISED FUND: $200,000 · OtherDAW DONOR ADVISED FUNDBONTON FARMS: $190,000 · OtherBONTON FARMSSTARFISH: $150,396 · OtherSTARFISHTexas Women's Foundation: $108,500 · OtherTexas Women's FoundationTEXAS WOMANS UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherTEXAS WOMANS UNIVERSITYSCHOLARSHOT: $75,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHOTQUALITY OF LIFE FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Other+61 more: $288,825 · Other+61 moreAUSTIN COLLEGE: $346,000 · EducationAUSTIN COLLEGEUNITED TO LEARN: $117,200 · EducationUNITED TO LEARNCOMMIT2DALLAS: $102,500 · EducationCOMMIT2DALLASTeach for America Inc: $90,000 · EducationTeach for America IncTEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $29,600 · Education+14 more: $126,100 · Education+14 moreTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $228,406 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS FO…COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES F…DALLAS SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $13,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GOODNESS WEB FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $10,545 · PhilanthropyMomentous Institute: $37,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $10,500 · Youth DevelopmentBLACK ACADEMY OF ARTS AND LETTERS INC: $11,358 · Arts & CulturePEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $4,500 · Arts & CultureALL STARS PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED STATES CAPITOL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $1,750 · Arts & CultureJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesKID NET FOUNDATION JONATHANS PLACE: $7,500 · Human ServicesOTR RESOURCES: $6,042 · Human Services+1 more: $50 · Human ServicesTexas 2036: $5,000 · Public BenefitCombined Arms: $5,000 · Public BenefitCenter for Public Policy Priorities: $2,500 · Public Benefit
Other$1,157,721Education$811,400Philanthropy$291,951Youth Development$48,000Arts & Culture$31,608Human Services$23,592Public Benefit$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUSTIN COLLEGE: $346,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $228,406 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED TO LEARN: $117,200 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetTexas Women's Foundation: $108,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMIT2DALLAS: $102,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOLARSHOT: $75,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetMomentous Institute: $37,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $29,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTrinity University: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Regional Chamber: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION: $24,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGood Reason Houston Inc: $23,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Educator Collective: $13,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetDALLAS SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $13,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBLACK ACADEMY OF ARTS AND LETTERS INC: $11,358 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $10,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GOODNESS WEB FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetI Am A Golfer Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEACH PLUS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEADERSHIP ISD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKID NET FOUNDATION JONATHANS PLACE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAFTER8TOEDUCATE: $7,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetOTR RESOURCES: $6,042 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas 2036: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLATINOS FOR EDUCATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCombined Arms: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TEACHING TRUST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $4,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH DALLAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEREOLIPI NOMADIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $3,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS: $3,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChildren At Risk: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABERG CENTER FOR LITERACY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCITYLAB HS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTRINITY RIVER MISSION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTX49.7× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Addy Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Meadows Foundation Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Hoglund Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Byrne Family Foundation Trust · The Perot Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Todd a Williams Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Todd a Williams Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Todd a Williams Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Todd a Williams Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Todd a Williams Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph