Skip to content

· Private foundation

TODAY Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$53kPhilanthropy$26kEducation$23kCrime & Legal$19kYouth Development$17kHuman Services$15kEnvironment$6kCivil Rights$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Beaches Giving Fund$6,000
La Center Youth Football$5,000
Clark County Sheriff Santa's Posse$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Boys and Girls Club$1,500
Vancouver Public Community Schools$1,500
Hockinson High School Boosters$1,500
Make-A-Wish$1,500
Native American Parent Assoc - SW W$1,500
The Columbian NIE Program$1,000
Camas High School Swim Team$1,000
Restored and Revived$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Prairie High School Band Boosters$1,000
Operation Pitch Invasion$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YWCA of Clark County: $3k → 9%YWCA of Clark County: $2k → 9%YWCA of Clark County: $1k → 9%Restored and Revived: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$86k · 11 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
43

Total granted

$86k
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+42%

Still filing today

9%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    Beaches Giving Fund
    4× · 2021–2024 · $22k
  • CC
    Clark County Sheriff Santa's Posse
    4× · 2021–2024 · $18k
  • CM
    Covington Middle School
    3× · 2021–2024 · $10k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • RS
    Rock Solid Teen Center
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • TH
    The Hudson Bay School Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Football Club West

Teach and promote soccer, including fair play and sportsmanship.

Recreation & Sports
2
Wa High School Equestrian Teams
Recreation & Sports
3
Wenatchee Valley Lacrosse

The Wenatchee Valley Lacrosse Club is dedicated to organizing, developing, and promoting the sport of lacrosse within the North Central Washington community. The club seeks to honor the game by instilling values of scholastic achievement,…

Recreation & Sports
4
Little League Baseball Inc

An athletic program for youth that teaches and reinforces the values of teamwork, sportsmanship, citizenship and physical well being. Our organization is guided by the leadership of community orientated volunteers. We serve over 600…

Recreation & Sports
5
Nw Legends

The mission is to develop the next generation of youth by honoring God through integrity, leadership and competition in sports.

Recreation & Sports
6
Central Range Pickleball Club
Recreation & Sports
7
Juanita Lacrosse Club

To provide an organized and safe lacrosse program

Recreation & Sports
8
Little League Baseball Inc

adult volunteers helping on average ~300 children each year ages 4-12 in East Vancouver WA area to grow and develop by working as a team to achieve goals and have fun.

—
9
Cowlitz Youth Soccer Association

Education of youth in the game of soccer by teaching the skills of the game and providing a network of area recreational clubs and elite programs.

Recreation & Sports
10
Clackamas Youth Lacrosse Inc

Clackamas youth lacrosse provides an opportunity for youth to learn and play the growing sport of lacrosse. girls and boys in grades 3 through 8 in the north clackamas school district attendance area are served by this organization.

—
11
Crestview Soccer Boosters
Recreation & Sports
12
Palouse Havoc Fastpitch Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Excel Northwest Volleyball Club; the most unlike its peers is Prairies Hs Band Booster Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Beaches Giving Fund: $21,500 · OtherBeaches Giving FundClark County Sheriff Santa's Posse: $17,500 · OtherClark County Sheriff Santa's PosseCovington Middle School: $10,000 · OtherCovington Middle SchoolHockinson High School Boosters: $8,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherBoys and Girls Club: $7,000 · Other+47 more: $97,838 · Other+47 moreYWCA CLARK COUNTY: $5,000 · Human ServicesSANTAS POSSE: $1,000 · Human ServicesRestored and Revived: $1,000 · Human ServicesOperation Pitch Invasion: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsVANCOUVER WEST SOCCER CLUB: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsKlineline Kids Fishing Nonprofit: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsCLARK COUNTY CHAPTER OF THE FELLOWS: $2,000 · ReligionCELEBRATE LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 · ReligionExcel Northwest Volleyball Club: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentROCKSOLID COMMUNITY TEEN CENTER: $500 · Youth DevelopmentDucks Unlimited Inc: $1,500 · EnvironmentPRAIRIES HS BAND BOOSTER CLUB: $1,000 · EducationGREATER CLARK COUNTY KENNEL CLUB INC: $500 · Animals
Other$170,138Human Services$7,000Recreation & Sports$3,000Religion$2,500Youth Development$2,500Environment$1,500Education$1,000Animals$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYWCA CLARK COUNTY: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLEWIS RIVER LITTLE LEAGUE: $3,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetCLARK COUNTY CHAPTER OF THE FELLOWS: $2,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetExcel Northwest Volleyball Club: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKlineline Kids Fishing Nonprofit: $1,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetRestored and Revived: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER CLARK COUNTY KENNEL CLUB INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetROCKSOLID COMMUNITY TEEN CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCELEBRATE LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YWCA CLARK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds LEWIS RIVER LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY CHAPTER OF THE FELLOWS ↗
  • Who funds Excel Northwest Volleyball Club ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds Operation Pitch Invasion ↗
  • Who funds SANTAS POSSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Firstenburg FoundationWA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Firstenburg Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization TODAY Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from TODAY Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on TODAY’s filings →

    More from the funding graph