Skip to content
Tntp Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Tntp Inc

Tntp's mission is to transform education so every young person thrives.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$11MCommunity Improvement$248kEmployment$198kYouth Development$58kHuman Services$22kArts & Culture$11kPhilanthropy$11kReligion$8k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $257k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $684k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.5M
$46,600
Median grant
4
States reached
$96M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RECONSTRUCTION US INC$1,172,348
CITY OF BROCKTON - TREASURER'S OFFICE$330,000
DIFFUSION VENTURE STUDIO INC$242,860
WACHUSETT REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$93,615
TOWN OF MILFORD$85,000
TOWN OF WEST SPRINGFIELD$70,000
DENNIS-YARMOUTH REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$68,250
TOWN OF AMHERST$68,200
RIVET SCHOOL (BAY AREA HYBRID COLLEGE INITIATIVE)$56,000
TOWN OF NEEDHAM$46,600
CITY OF HOLYOKE-HOLYOKE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$37,200
NASHOBA REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$28,506
GREATER LAWRENCE REGIONAL VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT$26,400
SOUTH SHORE CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOL$22,271
TOWN OF PETERSHAM$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE CURRENT PROJECT: $15k → 17%DELTA CIRCLES INC: $27k → 17%MCEL UNITED INC: $28k → 13%SUCCESSLINK DBA SHIPHT: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NY
MA
IA
IN
PA
NJ
RI
CA
NM
AR
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.9M · 12 repeat orgs$4.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
45

Total granted

$6.9M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+9%

Still filing today

42%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MIND TRUST INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $900k · revenue +122%
  • I
    IMMSCHOOLS
    2× · 2019–2022 · $24k · revenue +874%
  • TEACH PLUS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $18k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • NS
    NATIONAL SUMMER SCHOOL INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2022 · $542k · revenue -4%
  • MR
    MEMPHIS RIVER PARKS PARTNERSHIP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue +100%
  • CS
    CENTRAL SIX DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL REGION 4 INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +155% · 29% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ilearn Collaborative

ILearn Collaborative creates equity in education by building the capacity of educators to implement student-centered learning. We provide professional development, consulting services and a wide variety of digital resources, and we welcome…

Education
2
Leading Educators Inc

Leading educators partners with school systems to build and sustain the conditions, teaching, and leadership to ensure that the students furthest from opportunity succeed in school and in life.

Education
3
Equal Opportunity Schools

Equal opportunity schools' mission is to strengthen educator and system leader capacity to break down barriers to increase access, belonging, and success in rigorous college and career-prep secondary school courses for students of color…

Education
4
The Leadership Academy Inc

Harnessing leadership as a lever for change, we partner with education leaders through professional learning and coaching to transform schools and accelerate learning for all students.

Education
5
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
6
The National Center on Education and the Economy

The Center is dedicated to providing tools the nation needs to lead the world in education & training in a swiftly globalizing world economy.

Public Benefit
7
Breakthrough Birmingham

Breakthrough Birmingham works with highly motivated, traditionally underrepresented students in Alabama to achieve post-secondary success while empowering aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educators and advocates.

Education
8
360 Accelerator Education Partners

360 Accelerator provides leadership development services to public education leaders.

—
9
Bpe Inc

Bpe drives exceptional outcomes for all students by developing great teachers and great schools. for three decades, bpe (formerly the boston plan for excellence) has devised solutions to the toughest challenges faced by boston's students…

Education
10
Black Men Teach

Black Men Teach (BMT) recruits, prepares, places, and retains Black male teachers in elementary schools by building a robust pathway to the teaching profession.

Human Services
11
Throughline Learning

Throughline learning partners with communities to imagine and create more equitable, relevant, and effective schools. using research, we convene, coach, and build capacity to improve outcomes and experiences for all students.

Human Services
12
Building Bridges Education

Building Bridges Education (BBE) is a non-profit organization at the forefront of creating transformative, high-impact programming. BBE is committed to equity-driven initiatives that empower students to embark on journeys of…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latinos for Education Inc; the most unlike its peers is Successlink Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAY YES TO EDUCATION INC: $1,238,191 · OtherSAY YES TO EDUCATION INCRECONSTRUCTION US INC: $1,172,348 · OtherRECONSTRUCTION US INCPASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $922,215 · OtherPASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTGuilford Co Public Schools: $800,000 · OtherGuilford Co Public SchoolsDEKALB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $750,000 · OtherDEKALB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTCENTRAL FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $680,600 · OtherCENTRAL FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICTEDGECOMBE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $521,336 · OtherEDGECOMBE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSCITY OF BROCKTON - TREASURER'S OFFICE: $330,000 · Other+35 more: $1,531,539 · Other+35 moreTHE MIND TRUST INC: $900,000 · EducationTHE MIND TRUST INCTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $900,000 · EducationTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC ED…NEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS INC: $123,000 · EducationNEW CLASSROOMS INNOVA…+13 more: $243,250 · Education+13 moreNATIONAL SUMMER SCHOOL INITIATIVE: $542,182 · PhilanthropyPREPARATORY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyFoundation for Portland Public Schools: $25,000 · PhilanthropyMEMPHIS RIVER PARKS PARTNERSHIP INC: $200,000 · Community ImprovementBOYS GIRLS ADULTS COMM DEV CTR INC: $21,076 · Community ImprovementVillage Of Wisdom: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentLittle Lights Urban Ministries Inc: $28,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BLACK SWAN ACADEMY INC: $23,574 · Youth DevelopmentUrban Faith Mission: $7,920 · Youth DevelopmentCENTRAL SIX DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL REGION 4 INC: $150,000 · EmploymentMCEL UNITED INC: $27,500 · Human ServicesDELTA CIRCLES INC: $26,850 · Human ServicesSA CHRISTIAN HOPE RESOURCE CNTR INC DBA SA HOPE CENTER: $22,136 · Human ServicesCURRENT PROJECT: $15,000 · Human ServicesSUCCESSLINK INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesFLOURISH ALABAMA: $11,250 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR BLACK EDUCATOR DEVELOPMENT: $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$7,946,229Education$2,166,250Philanthropy$592,182Community Improvement$221,076Youth Development$209,994Employment$150,000Human Services$106,486Arts & Culture$18,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAY YES TO EDUCATION INC: $1,238,191 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MIND TRUST INC: $900,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $900,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL SUMMER SCHOOL INITIATIVE: $542,182 over 1y, 15% of budgetMEMPHIS RIVER PARKS PARTNERSHIP INC: $200,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetCENTRAL SIX DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL REGION 4 INC: $150,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetVillage Of Wisdom: $150,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetNEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS INC: $123,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBay Area Hybrid College Initiative DBA Rivet School: $56,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $31,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Lights Urban Ministries Inc: $28,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMCEL UNITED INC: $27,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetPREPARATORY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTeach Western Mass Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFoundation for Portland Public Schools: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetIMMSCHOOLS: $24,400 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetTHE BLACK SWAN ACADEMY INC: $23,574 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetSA CHRISTIAN HOPE RESOURCE CNTR INC DBA SA HOPE CENTER: $22,136 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBOYS GIRLS ADULTS COMM DEV CTR INC: $21,076 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMOTT HAVEN ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLATINOS FOR EDUCATION INC: $17,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEACH PLUS INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR RACIAL EQUITY IN EDUCATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCURRENT PROJECT: $15,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetSUCCESSLINK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBlack Church Center for Justice and Equality: $15,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetFLOURISH ALABAMA: $11,250 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetLATINX EDUCATION CENTER: $11,250 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetUrban Faith Mission: $7,920 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetThe Education Trust Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BLACK EDUCATOR DEVELOPMENT: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW LEADERS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAY YES TO EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MIND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SUMMER SCHOOL INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS RIVER PARKS PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL SIX DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL REGION 4 INC ↗
  • Who funds Village Of Wisdom ↗
  • Who funds NEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Bay Area Hybrid College Initiative DBA Rivet School ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds Little Lights Urban Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds MCEL UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds DELTA CIRCLES INC ↗
  • Who funds PREPARATORY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach Western Mass Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Schools FundBarr FoundationWalton Family Foundat…Project Lead the Way …GenYOUTH IncorporatedCenter for Technology…Project Lead the Way …Project Bread-The Wal…Nellie Mae Education …Rockefeller Philanthr…Charles and Lynn Schu…Carnegie Corporation …
New Schools FundCA29.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Schools Fund · Barr Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Project Lead the Way Inc · Project Bread-The Walk for Hunger Inc · Nellie Mae Education Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Carnegie Corporation of New York

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tntp Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tntp Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Teach Western Mass Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tntp’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home