· Public charity
Tntp Inc
Tntp's mission is to transform education so every young person thrives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k11 grants · $257k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $684k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RECONSTRUCTION US INC | $1,172,348 |
| CITY OF BROCKTON - TREASURER'S OFFICE | $330,000 |
| DIFFUSION VENTURE STUDIO INC | $242,860 |
| WACHUSETT REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT | $93,615 |
| TOWN OF MILFORD | $85,000 |
| TOWN OF WEST SPRINGFIELD | $70,000 |
| DENNIS-YARMOUTH REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT | $68,250 |
| TOWN OF AMHERST | $68,200 |
| RIVET SCHOOL (BAY AREA HYBRID COLLEGE INITIATIVE) | $56,000 |
| TOWN OF NEEDHAM | $46,600 |
| CITY OF HOLYOKE-HOLYOKE PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $37,200 |
| NASHOBA REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT | $28,506 |
| GREATER LAWRENCE REGIONAL VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT | $26,400 |
| SOUTH SHORE CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOL | $22,271 |
| TOWN OF PETERSHAM | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMTHE MIND TRUST INC2× · 2021–2022 · $900k · revenue +122%
- IIMMSCHOOLS2× · 2019–2022 · $24k · revenue +874%
TEACH PLUS INC2× · 2022–2023 · $18k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- NSNATIONAL SUMMER SCHOOL INITIATIVEone grant, 2022 · $542k · revenue -4%
- MRMEMPHIS RIVER PARKS PARTNERSHIP INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue +100%
- CSCENTRAL SIX DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL REGION 4 INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +155% · 29% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
ILearn Collaborative creates equity in education by building the capacity of educators to implement student-centered learning. We provide professional development, consulting services and a wide variety of digital resources, and we welcome…
Leading educators partners with school systems to build and sustain the conditions, teaching, and leadership to ensure that the students furthest from opportunity succeed in school and in life.
Equal opportunity schools' mission is to strengthen educator and system leader capacity to break down barriers to increase access, belonging, and success in rigorous college and career-prep secondary school courses for students of color…
Harnessing leadership as a lever for change, we partner with education leaders through professional learning and coaching to transform schools and accelerate learning for all students.
See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…
The Center is dedicated to providing tools the nation needs to lead the world in education & training in a swiftly globalizing world economy.
Breakthrough Birmingham works with highly motivated, traditionally underrepresented students in Alabama to achieve post-secondary success while empowering aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educators and advocates.
360 Accelerator provides leadership development services to public education leaders.
Bpe drives exceptional outcomes for all students by developing great teachers and great schools. for three decades, bpe (formerly the boston plan for excellence) has devised solutions to the toughest challenges faced by boston's students…
Black Men Teach (BMT) recruits, prepares, places, and retains Black male teachers in elementary schools by building a robust pathway to the teaching profession.
Our mission is to develop effective culturally responsive educators who cultivate learning partnerships and grow independent thinkers into change agents for their communities.
Throughline learning partners with communities to imagine and create more equitable, relevant, and effective schools. using research, we convene, coach, and build capacity to improve outcomes and experiences for all students.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latinos for Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is Successlink Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAY YES TO EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds THE MIND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SUMMER SCHOOL INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds MEMPHIS RIVER PARKS PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL SIX DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL REGION 4 INC ↗
- Who funds Village Of Wisdom ↗
- Who funds NEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds Bay Area Hybrid College Initiative DBA Rivet School ↗
- Who funds ASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Little Lights Urban Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds MCEL UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds DELTA CIRCLES INC ↗
- Who funds PREPARATORY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Teach Western Mass Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Schools Fund · Barr Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Project Lead the Way Inc · Project Bread-The Walk for Hunger Inc · Nellie Mae Education Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Carnegie Corporation of New York
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tntp Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Teach Western Mass Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.