Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

TMT Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$9.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$20MEnvironment$950kYouth Development$740kHuman Services$700kPhilanthropy$650kReligion$400kInternational$275kArts & Culture$175kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $625k
  • $250k+6 grants · $16M
$75,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$9,591,507
TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE$4,000,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000,000
GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL SCHOLAR$576,800
WILD SALMON CENTER$500,000
THE BRIDGE PROJECT$500,000
FUNDPLAY FOUNDATION$100,000
FAMILY CENTERS$100,000
KIDS IN CRISIS$75,000
STJUDE$75,000
PARTNERSHIP TO END HUMAN TRAFFICKING$75,000
BOYS AND GRILS CLUB OF GREENWICH$75,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
GLAM4GOOD$50,000
ST NICHOLAS RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $275k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%GOSHEN VALLEY BOYS RANCH INC: $75k → 6%NIDO DE ESPERANZA CHARITABLE SOCIETY: $100k → 17%NIDO DE ESPERANZA CHARITABLE SOCIETY: $25k → 17%GOSHEN VALLEY BOYS RANCH INC: $75k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
IL
NY
OR
WY
PA
CT
CA
CO
KS
TN
MS
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 21 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +125% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
13

Total granted

$16M
$561k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+125%
+41%

Still filing today

67%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $12M · revenue +182%
  • WILD SALMON CENTER
    4× · 2019–2024 · $950k · revenue +172%
  • PF
    PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $475k · revenue +179%

Funded once

  • TD
    THE DARTMOUTH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue -23%
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $75k
  • L4
    LEAGUE 42
    one grant, 2023 · $75k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Childhood Foundation Inc

The mission of the foundation is to inspire, promote, and develop solutions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of children.

Human Services
2
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
3
The Waldorf School Inc

The waldorf school of lexington nurtures each child's curiosity, ingenuity, and love of learning so that they can meet the future with wonder, confidence, and resilience.

Education
4
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
5
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
6
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation

The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…

Health
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
9
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
12
Children's Scholarship Fund Philadelphia

With over 20 years of experience and over 30,000 scholarships awarded, csfp provides philadelphia children with eight-year, needs-based scholarships to attend safe, quality, k-8th grade schools. continued on schedule o.supporting…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nido De Esperanza Charitable Society and the most unlike its peers is The Dartmouth Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Child and Family ServicesEarly Childhood Education C…Pregnancy Support ServicesYouth Sports Booster Organi…Jewish Community FederationsWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Animal Rescue and AdoptionPublic University Foundatio…Land Conservation Organizat…Cancer Support OrganizationsYouth Development CentersDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Elementary Literacy Tutoring
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%11%<5yr12%11%5–10yr18%11%10–20yr18%26%20–35yr14%7%35–55yr20%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%7%<5yr12%2%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr18%77%20–35yr14%3%35–55yr20%9%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
10%
2,154/22,412

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
24/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $11,826,147 · EducationGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INCTrustees of Dartmouth College — $6,774,019 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth College+4 more — $552,000 · EducationIndividual grant recipient — $1,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant…GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL SCHOLAR — $576,800 · OtherGREENWICH COUNTR…GOSHEN VALLEY BOYS RANCH INC — $250,000 · OtherGOSHEN VALLEY BO…KIDS IN CRISIS INC — $225,000 · OtherKIDS IN CRISIS I…STJUDE — $175,000 · OtherThe Family Center Inc — $175,000 · OtherFAMILY CENTERS INC — $175,000 · OtherTHE DARTMOUTH INC — $150,000 · Other+18 more — $1,031,500 · Other+18 moreWILD SALMON CENTER — $950,000 · Animals+1 more — $200 · AnimalsTHE BRIDGE PROJECT INC — $500,000 · PhilanthropyGlam4Good Foundation — $150,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $20,000 · PhilanthropyGOSHEN VALLEY FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesNIDO DE ESPERANZA CHARITABLE SOCIETY — $125,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH — $215,000 · Youth DevelopmentST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100,000 · HealthFISHING FOR THE FIGHT — $25,000 · HealthAugies Quest to Cure ALS Inc — $15,000 · Health
Education$19,152,166Other$3,758,300Animals$950,200Philanthropy$670,000Human Services$275,000Youth Development$215,000Health$140,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $11,826,147 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $6,774,019 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWILD SALMON CENTER — $950,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetTHE BRIDGE PROJECT INC — $500,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC — $475,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetKIDS IN CRISIS INC — $225,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH — $215,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetThe Family Center Inc — $175,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetFAMILY CENTERS INC — $175,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGlam4Good Foundation — $150,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetGOSHEN VALLEY FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNIDO DE ESPERANZA CHARITABLE SOCIETY — $125,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFundplay Foundation — $100,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetTHE EXODUS ROAD INC — $100,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCHANGE FOR KIDS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBREAKING THE CHAINS — $50,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetCENTER TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING — $50,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFISHING FOR THE FIGHT — $25,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF ARTS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LION FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetWILD TERRA FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetWICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL — $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAugies Quest to Cure ALS Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA TOP CHILDRENS FUND — $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWichita Downtown Development Corporation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA KANSAS — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Daniel J Taylor Famil…Berry Foundation IncLattner Family Founda…Textron Charitable Tr…National Philanthropi…The Ayco Charitable F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Raymond James Charita…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Natl Christian Charit…
Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable FoundationKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization TMT Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
  • Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Family Centers Inc — 20% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich — 7% of income from government
  • The Family Center Inc — 0% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines