Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tmi Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$146kHealth$140kCommunity Improvement$124kHousing & Shelter$98kPublic Safety & Disaster$60kFood & Nutrition$58kInternational$45kEducation$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$3,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROTARY CLUB OF BIG BEAR LAKE$14,000
BEAR VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL$10,000
DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
TUFENKIAN FOUNDATION$5,000
SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF ROSEVILLE$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY$3,000
SHRINER'S CHILDREN HOSPITAL$3,000
LOS ANGELES MISSION$3,000
UNION RESCUE MISSION$3,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN HOSPITAL$3,000
CITY OF HOPE$2,500
BEAR VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS$2,500
FEEDING AMERICA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $121k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ELDER LOVE USA: $4k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%ELDER LOVE - USA: $3k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%ELDER LOVE USA: $3k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%ELDER LOVE - USA: $2k → 11%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $3k → 14%MOM & DAD PROJECT: $5k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC: $15k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY: $10k → 14%DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY: $10k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $250 → 14%DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY: $5k → 14%DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY: $5k → 14%DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY: $3k → 14%DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
TN
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$655k · 25 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
11

Total granted

$655k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+26%

Still filing today

56%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +109%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    4× · 2021–2025 · $35k · revenue +27%
  • BV
    BEAR VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2021 · $35k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • AR
    ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +110%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY USA
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • TR
    THE ROTERY CLUB OF BIG BEAR LAKE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Armenian General Benevolent Union

Ensuring the prosperity and well-being of all armenians.

—
2
Armenian Wounded Heroes Fund Inc
International
3
International Federation of Red Cross Red Crescent Soc At the Un Inc
—
4
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation

Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.

Health
5
Armenian Bone Marrow Donor Registry Corp

Maintaining a data bank of marrow donors.

Health
6
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
7
Mesoamerican Research Foundation
Social Science
8
One Armenia Inc

To support job-creation in armenia via crowdfunding for innovative and sustainable projects focused on agriculture, tourism, technology and local production.

Philanthropy
9
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
10
Armenian Relief & Development Association

Helps children, elderly and families in armenia with basic humanitarian and spiritual needs.

International
11
The Heart Foundation

The heart foundation (thf) was created to save lives from heart disease by increasing awareness, educating the public, and supporting innovative research at smidt heart institute at cedars-sinai medical center in los angeles, california.…

Philanthropy
12
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tufenkian Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROTARY CLUB OF BIG BEAR LAKE: $132,833 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF BIG BEAR LAKEBEAR VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $62,000 · OtherBEAR VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITALTHE SALVATION ARMY: $50,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYBELIEVER'S CHAPEL FOOD BANK: $17,250 · OtherLIGHT HOUSE PROJECT INC: $16,500 · OtherARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY OF WESTERN USA INC: $15,500 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $15,000 · OtherUNITED ARMENIAN CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherBear Valley Meals on Wheels: $15,000 · Other+18 more: $95,000 · Other+18 moreDOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC: $49,385 · Human ServicesDOVES OF BIG BEAR …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $35,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National …UNION RESCUE MISSION: $18,250 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSI…ELDER LOVE USA: $10,500 · Human ServicesELDER LOVE USAThe Mom & Dad Project: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesBEAR VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $35,000 · HealthBEAR VALL…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $13,500 · HealthST JUDE C…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7,500 · HealthAMERICAN …American Heart Association Inc: $6,000 · HealthAmerican …LOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $61,000 · Housing & ShelterLOS ANGEL…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 · InternationalARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · InternationalARMENIA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $4,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalRotary Club of Big Bear Lake: $20,000 · EducationSOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL ROSEVILLE: $19,150 · Crime & Legal
Other$434,583Human Services$120,635Health$62,000Housing & Shelter$61,000International$30,000Education$20,000Crime & Legal$19,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $61,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC: $49,385 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBEAR VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetRotary Club of Big Bear Lake: $20,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetSOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL ROSEVILLE: $19,150 over 6y, 8.8% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $18,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY OF WESTERN USA INC: $15,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBear Valley Meals on Wheels: $15,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetELDER LOVE USA: $10,500 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTUFENKIAN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARMENIA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetLIGHT HOUSE GROUP INC: $4,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES NATIONAL CAPITAL AREAINC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARMENIAN INDEPENDENT BROADCASTING OF BOSTON INC: $2,500 over 1y, 24% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES ADAPTIVE RECREATION CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds BEAR VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Rotary Club of Big Bear Lake ↗
  • Who funds SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL ROSEVILLE ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY OF WESTERN USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Bear Valley Meals on Wheels ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ELDER LOVE USA ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds TUFENKIAN FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TUFENKIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Mom & Dad Project ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIA SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT HOUSE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES NATIONAL CAPITAL AREAINC ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIAN INDEPENDENT BROADCASTING OF BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

America's CharitiesVA15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: America's Charities · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tmi Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tmi Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tmi’s filings →

    More from the funding graph