· Private foundation
Tmi Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $60k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROTARY CLUB OF BIG BEAR LAKE | $14,000 |
| BEAR VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $5,000 |
| DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY | $5,000 |
| TUFENKIAN FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF ROSEVILLE | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $5,000 |
| LOS ANGELES MISSION | $3,000 |
| UNION RESCUE MISSION | $3,000 |
| SHRINER'S CHILDREN HOSPITAL | $3,000 |
| ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY | $3,000 |
| ST JUDE'S CHILDREN HOSPITAL | $3,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $2,500 |
| CITY OF HOPE | $2,500 |
| UNITED ARMENIAN CHURCH | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $121k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC7× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +109%- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches4× · 2021–2025 · $35k · revenue +27%
- BVBEAR VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT FOUNDATION2× · 2018–2021 · $35k · revenue +73%
Funded once
- ARARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +110%
- SASALVATION ARMY USAone grant, 2018 · $10k
- TRTHE ROTERY CLUB OF BIG BEAR LAKEone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ensuring the prosperity and well-being of all armenians.
Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.
Maintaining a data bank of marrow donors.
The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.
To support job-creation in armenia via crowdfunding for innovative and sustainable projects focused on agriculture, tourism, technology and local production.
Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…
Helps children, elderly and families in armenia with basic humanitarian and spiritual needs.
The heart foundation (thf) was created to save lives from heart disease by increasing awareness, educating the public, and supporting innovative research at smidt heart institute at cedars-sinai medical center in los angeles, california.…
The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tufenkian Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds BEAR VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Rotary Club of Big Bear Lake ↗
- Who funds SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL ROSEVILLE ↗
- Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY OF WESTERN USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Bear Valley Meals on Wheels ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds ELDER LOVE USA ↗
- Who funds ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds The Mom & Dad Project ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TUFENKIAN FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TUFENKIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHT HOUSE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds ARMENIA SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES NATIONAL CAPITAL AREAINC ↗
- Who funds ARMENIAN INDEPENDENT BROADCASTING OF BOSTON INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: America's Charities · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tmi Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.