Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Timothy Maguire Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192023.

Education$586kReligion$228kHousing & Shelter$180kRecreation & Sports$79kHealth$73kHuman Services$44kYouth Development$11kOther$0
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$8,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$52
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION$25,000
DAVE MCGILLIVRAY FINISH STRONG FOUNDATION$10,000
THE JONES-GORDON FOUNDATION$8,000
CHILDHELP$1,000
CCO (COALITION OF CHRISTIAN OUTREACH)$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $243k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PROJECT HOME: $60k → 22%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $34k → 11%PROJECT HOME: $60k → 22%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%CHILDHELP: $1k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%FACE TO FACE: $15k → 22%FACE TO FACE: $15k → 22%FACE TO FACE: $13k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CA
AZ
DC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$932k · 8 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
14

Total granted

$932k
$275k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+25%

Still filing today

75%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WILLIAM PENN CHARTER SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $300k · revenue +34%
  • SJ
    SAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $175k · revenue +34%
  • CA
    CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $79k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PAPAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • PH
    PROJECT HOME
    one grant, 2019 · $60k
  • CT
    CARON TREATMENT CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $33k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
3
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
6
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
7
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
8
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
9
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

10
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
11
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
12
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Challenged Athletes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Phoenix Children's Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WILLIAM PENN CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $300,000 · EducationWILLIAM PENN CHARTER SCHOOL INCSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY — $175,000 · EducationSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY+1 more — $8,000 · EducationALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL — $103,000 · OtherALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOLTHE PAPAL FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherTHE PAPAL FOUNDATIONST MICHAELS ABBEY — $92,000 · OtherST MICHAELS ABBEYPROJECT HOME — $60,000 · OtherPROJECT HOMECARON TREATMENT CENTER — $33,270 · OtherCARON TREATMENT CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+8 more — $42,850 · Other+8 morePROJECT HOME — $120,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOMECHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $79,366 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES IN…FACE TO FACE INC — $42,500 · Human ServicesFACE TO FACE INC+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesPhoenix Children's Hospital — $20,000 · HealthTHE BRAIN ANEURYSM FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · HealthBanner Health Foundation — $2,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $2,000 · HealthDAVE MCGILLIVRAY FINISH STRONG FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Education$483,000Other$456,120Human Services$242,866Health$34,500Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWILLIAM PENN CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $300,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY — $175,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOME — $120,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $79,366 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFACE TO FACE INC — $42,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAVE MCGILLIVRAY FINISH STRONG FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHE BRAIN ANEURYSM FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJONES-GORDON FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBanner Health Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHELP INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR CHRISTIAN OUTREACH — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILLIAM PENN CHARTER SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds SAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC
  • Who funds FACE TO FACE INC
  • Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital
  • Who funds DAVE MCGILLIVRAY FINISH STRONG FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE BRAIN ANEURYSM FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JONES-GORDON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Banner Health Foundation
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC
  • Who funds COALITION FOR CHRISTIAN OUTREACH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Timothy Maguire Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Timothy Maguire Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Timothy Maguire Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph