Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Timothy and Vivian Sullivan Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$162k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$1.5MHuman Services$182kRecreation & Sports$150kEducation$139kHealth$64kHousing & Shelter$50kCrime & Legal$5kOther$360k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$12,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$391k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Way of Greater Milwaukee$125,000
St Ann Center for Intergenerational Care$14,750
Carroll University$12,500
South Milwaukee Human Concerns$5,000
Young Americans Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%St Ann Center for Intergenerational Care: $33k → 17%St Ann Center for Intergenerational Care: $26k → 17%St Ann Center for Intergenerational Care: $20k → 17%St Ann Center for Intergenerational Care: $20k → 17%St Ann Center for Intergenerational Care: $19k → 17%St Ann Center for Intergenerational Care: $19k → 17%St Ann Center for Intergenerational Care: $16k → 17%St Ann Center for Intergenerational Care: $15k → 17%St Ann Center for Intergenerational Care: $10k → 17%South Milwaukee Human Concerns: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 11 repeat orgs$341k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
19

Total granted

$2.1M
$331k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
0%

Still filing today

45%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $177k · revenue +18%
  • CU
    CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $129k · revenue +18%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • CONSERVANCY FOR HEALING &
    one grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue 0%
  • HUNGER TASK FORCE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -29%
  • ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +242%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc

The mission of gundersen lutheran medical foundation, inc. is to improve the lives of patients and our larger community through medical education, research, outreach, and the philanthropic support of gundersen health system.

Health
3
St Mary's Foundation Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

4
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
8
SwedishAmerican Hospital

Through excellence in healthcare and compassionate service, we care for our community.

Health
9
Healthy Wisconsin Alliance Inc

Healthy wisconsin alliance, inc. was created to promote the social welfare of the citizens of wisconsin including developing, defining, and encouraging distribution of information about wisconsin's health care climate and the importance of…

10
Center for Healthcare Careers of Southeast Wisconsin Inc

The mission of the center for healthcare careers of southeast wisconsin, inc. (chcsew) is to unite all appropriate stakeholders in a viable, flexible structure to locate, educate and support a workforce from service to professional levels…

Health
11
Ascension Wisconsin Foundation Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Philanthropy
12
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $1,455,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC+2 more — $17,200 · PhilanthropyFranklin Public Schools — $205,000 · OtherFranklin Public …HUNGER TASK FORCE INC — $50,000 · OtherHUNGER TASK FORC…United Performing Arts Foundation — $26,000 · OtherUnited Performin…St Augustine College Preparatory School — $20,000 · OtherSt Augustine Col…Children's Wisconsin Foundation — $12,816 · Other+13 more — $46,405 · Other+13 moreST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE — $177,265 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesCONSERVANCY FOR HEALING & — $150,000 · Recreation & SportsCARROLL UNIVERSITY INC — $128,500 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $10,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC — $59,726 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $2,500 · Health+2 more — $2,000 · HealthACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterSafe & Sound Inc — $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$1,472,200Other$360,221Human Services$182,265Recreation & Sports$150,000Education$138,500Health$64,226Housing & Shelter$50,000Crime & Legal$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $1,455,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE — $177,265 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCONSERVANCY FOR HEALING & — $150,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCARROLL UNIVERSITY INC — $128,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC — $59,726 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNOURISH EVERY CHILD — $12,200 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSafe & Sound Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE
  • Who funds CONSERVANCY FOR HEALING &
  • Who funds CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC
  • Who funds ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds NOURISH EVERY CHILD
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Safe & Sound Inc
  • Who funds SOUTH MILWAUKEE HUMAN CONCERNS INC
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds MEGHANS MISSION INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation IncWI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Timothy and Vivian Sullivan Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph