Skip to content
Timothy and Eleanor K Broe Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Timothy and Eleanor K Broe Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$60kReligion$56kYouth Development$44kInternational$36kHealth$28kArts & Culture$14kHuman Services$2kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$762k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,000
THE YUNION$7,000
CHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC SCHOOL$5,000
WESTSIDE CHRISTION ACADEMY$5,000
OMF INTERNATIONAL$4,500
LIBERIAN YOUTH ORCHESTRA$4,000
THRIVE TODAY$3,000
TZEDAKAH MINISTRIES INC$3,000
CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER$2,500
RIGHT TO LIFE$2,500
THE CRUCIBLE PROJECT$2,000
GOSPEL FELLOWSHIP ASSOCIATION$2,000
LEGACY CHURCH OF NOVI$2,000
THE CROSS MINISTRY PROJECT$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RETROUVAILLE OF METRO DETROIT: $1k → 10%THE HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IA
CA
CO
TN
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$227k · 20 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$227k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-17%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TY
    THE YUNION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +100%
  • WC
    Westside Christian Academy
    6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +5%
  • TT
    THRIVE TODAY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • RH
    REDEEMING HOPE CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • TA
    THE ALS ASSOCIATION TENNESSEE
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life Training Ministries Inc

Christian counseling for individuals with anxiety depression or other emotional struggles. Christian counseling for marriages and other couples.

Human Services
2
Caring Counseling Ministries

Biblical family counseling

Human Services
3
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

—
4
Transform Ministries
—
5
Crosswater Ministries
Religion
6
Divine Romance Ministries

Divine Romance Ministries Inc provides Christ-centered mentoringcoaching Our goal is to strengthen christian marriages in an effort to eliminate divorce The focus of our message is a complete and total submission to the Lord Jesus Christ 1…

Religion
7
Hopewell Ministries

To provide Christian counseling.

Human Services
8
Cry from the Wilderness Ministries
Religion
9
Shadow of His Wings Christian Fellowship

To provide a refuge for the brokenhearted.

Religion
10
Source of Hope Ministries
Religion
11
Refuge for Prodigals International Bible Ministries Inc
Religion
12
Repairing the Breach Ministries Inc
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healing of the Heart Ministries; the most unlike its peers is King Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OMF INTERNATIONAL INC: $28,540 · OtherOMF INTERNATIONAL INCCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER: $22,500 · OtherCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTERCHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $21,000 · OtherCHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGOSPEL FELLOWSHIP ASSOCIATION: $12,000 · OtherGOSPEL FELLOWSHIP ASSOCIATIONRIGHT TO LIFE: $9,500 · OtherRIGHT TO LIFERELIANT MISSION INC: $6,000 · OtherREDEEMING HOPE CHURCH: $5,000 · Other+14 more: $26,440 · Other+14 moreTHE YUNION: $40,000 · AnimalsTHE YUNIONWestside Christian Academy: $24,000 · EducationWestside Christi…THRIVE TODAY: $15,000 · EducationTHRIVE TODAYTzedakah Ministries Inc: $10,000 · ReligionThe Cross Ministry Group: $3,000 · ReligionEDGE VENTURE MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · ReligionHaven of Hope Ministry: $1,500 · Religion+1 more: $500 · ReligionLIBERIAN YOUTH ORCHESTRA: $14,000 · Arts & CultureLIVING HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $7,000 · InternationalThe Crucible Project: $3,000 · HealthBIBLICAL RESTORATION MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · Health
Other$145,980Animals$40,000Education$39,000Religion$17,000Arts & Culture$14,000International$7,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE YUNION: $40,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWestside Christian Academy: $24,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHRIVE TODAY: $15,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetLIBERIAN YOUTH ORCHESTRA: $14,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetTzedakah Ministries Inc: $10,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetLIVING HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $7,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetThe Cross Ministry Group: $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Crucible Project: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOJOURNER CHARITABLE FUND: $3,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBIBLICAL RESTORATION MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHaven of Hope Ministry: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRIGHT TO LIFE OF MICHIGAN: $1,440 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRetrouvaille of Metro Detroit: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetKing Family Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE YUNION ↗
  • Who funds Westside Christian Academy ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE TODAY ↗
  • Who funds LIBERIAN YOUTH ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds Tzedakah Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIVING HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds The Cross Ministry Group ↗
  • Who funds The Crucible Project ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNER CHARITABLE FUND ↗
  • Who funds BIBLICAL RESTORATION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds EDGE VENTURE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Haven of Hope Ministry ↗
  • Who funds RIGHT TO LIFE OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Retrouvaille of Metro Detroit ↗
  • Who funds King Family Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ↗
  • Who funds HEALING OF THE HEART MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Timothy and Eleanor K Broe Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Timothy and Eleanor K Broe Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Timothy and Eleanor K Broe Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home