· Private foundation
Timothy and Eleanor K Broe Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of TIMOTHY AND ELEANOR K BROE FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| THE YUNION | $7,000 |
| CHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| WESTSIDE CHRISTION ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| OMF INTERNATIONAL | $4,500 |
| LIBERIAN YOUTH ORCHESTRA | $4,000 |
| THRIVE TODAY | $3,000 |
| TZEDAKAH MINISTRIES INC | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER | $2,500 |
| LEGACY CHURCH OF NOVI | $2,000 |
| THE CRUCIBLE PROJECT | $2,000 |
| GOSPEL FELLOWSHIP ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
| THE CROSS MINISTRY PROJECT | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TYTHE YUNION6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +100%
- WCWestside Christian Academy6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +5%
- TTTHRIVE TODAY6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- RHREDEEMING HOPE CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $5k
- EVEDGE VENTURE MINISTRIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +29%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian counseling for individuals with anxiety depression or other emotional struggles. Christian counseling for marriages and other couples.
Biblical family counseling
Biblical counseling
Divine Romance Ministries Inc provides Christ-centered mentoringcoaching Our goal is to strengthen christian marriages in an effort to eliminate divorce The focus of our message is a complete and total submission to the Lord Jesus Christ 1…
To provide Christian counseling.
To provide a refuge for the brokenhearted.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healing of the Heart Ministries and the most unlike its peers is King Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE YUNION ↗
- Who funds Westside Christian Academy ↗
- Who funds THRIVE TODAY ↗
- Who funds LIBERIAN YOUTH ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds Tzedakah Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds LIVING HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds The Cross Ministry Group ↗
- Who funds The Crucible Project ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER CHARITABLE FUND ↗
- Who funds EDGE VENTURE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds BIBLICAL RESTORATION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Haven of Hope Ministry ↗
- Who funds RIGHT TO LIFE OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds King Family Foundation ↗
- Who funds Retrouvaille of Metro Detroit ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ↗
- Who funds HEALING OF THE HEART MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Timothy and Eleanor K Broe Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.