Skip to content

· Private foundation

Timken-Sturgis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$212kEnvironment$138kScience & Tech$90kFood & Nutrition$87kHuman Services$55kHealth$52kArts & Culture$46kPublic Safety & Disaster$39kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,000
THE SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIO SDY$10,000
ICAN FAMILY SERVICES$6,000
WHALE TRUST$6,000
DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$5,000
CARSON VLY COMM FOOD CLST$5,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$5,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$4,000
DOUGLAS CO SHERIFFS SEACH & R$3,000
EAST FORK FIRE AND PARAMEDIC DISTRICTS$3,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$3,000
THE COAST GUARD FOUNDATION$2,000
MAUI MEMORIAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION$2,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $500 → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $500 → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $500 → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $500 → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $500 → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $500 → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $500 → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $500 → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $500 → 14%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS C: $2k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS C: $2k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS C: $2k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS C: $2k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS C: $2k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS C: $1k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS C: $1k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS C: $1k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS C: $1k → 8%AUSTINS HOUSE: $500 → 8%AUSTINS HOUSE: $500 → 8%AUSTINS HOUSE: $500 → 8%AUSTINS HOUSE: $500 → 8%AUSTINS HOUSE: $500 → 8%AUSTINS HOUSE: $500 → 8%AUSTINS HOUSE: $500 → 8%AUSTINS HOUSE: $500 → 8%AUSTINS HOUSE: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MI
NY
NV
CT
CA
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$971k · 40 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
6

Total granted

$971k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+41%

Still filing today

53%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $96k · revenue +62%
  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $75k · revenue +14%
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $31k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +41%
  • LT
    Lake Tahoe Wildlife Care Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -35%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GENOAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +189%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Institute for Journalism & Natural Resources

The organization pursues higher standards of news coverage of natural resources and the environment -- standards of accuracy, fairness, balance, depth and context.

Arts & Culture
7
The Peregrine Fund Inc

To change the future for nature and humanity by conserving birds of prey worldwide.

—
8
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
9
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
12
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Wilderness Society; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Thorne Bay Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
28/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $185,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIO SDY: $90,000 · OtherTHE SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIO SDYARCS FOUNDATION INC: $52,500 · OtherARCS FOUNDATION INCCARSON VLY COMM FOOD CLST: $48,500 · OtherCARSON VLY COMM FOOD CLSTDOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL: $45,000 · OtherDOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOLTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $29,000 · Other+25 more: $227,000 · Other+25 moreWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $96,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLI…THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $8,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNE…CARSON VALLEY TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $7,000 · EnvironmentCARSON VALLE…+1 more: $3,000 · EnvironmentCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $75,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA …FRIENDS OF THE THORNE BAY LIBRARY: $13,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF …PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $9,000 · EducationPEPPERDINE …HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $6,000 · EducationHILLSDALE C…Nevada Museum of Art: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCHANNEL 5 PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureRENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $10,500 · Arts & CultureJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $31,000 · Public BenefitCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Public BenefitPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $17,000 · HealthMAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION: $12,000 · HealthFAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesAustin's House: $4,500 · Human ServicesTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $4,500 · Human Services
Other$677,000Environment$114,000Education$103,000Arts & Culture$40,500Public Benefit$39,000Health$29,000Human Services$23,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $96,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $31,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $29,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWHALE TRUST: $20,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRenown Health Foundation: $15,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNevada Museum of Art: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHANNEL 5 PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC: $14,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE THORNE BAY LIBRARY: $13,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetMAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetRENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $10,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNEVADA WOMEN'S FUND: $9,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBetween Horses and Humans: $7,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCARSON VALLEY TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $7,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAustin's House: $4,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURGENT ACTION FUND FOR FEMINIST ACTIVISM: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLake Tahoe Wildlife Care Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUI NO'EAU: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOACHARTORG: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds WHALE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Renown Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Nevada Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds CHANNEL 5 PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE THORNE BAY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds MAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA WOMEN'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Between Horses and Humans ↗
  • Who funds CARSON VALLEY TRAILS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Austin's House ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wray Family FoundationNV17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wray Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Peek Family Charitable Foundation · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Timken-Sturgis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Timken-Sturgis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Timken-Sturgis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph