Skip to content

· Private foundation

Timken Foundation of Canton

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$19M
Granted FY2025still arriving
111
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$36MEducation$26MArts & Culture$24MHuman Services$8.2MRecreation & Sports$8.1MHousing & Shelter$6.7MCommunity Improvement$4.7MPublic Safety & Disaster$4.6MOther$0
02FY2025 · 111 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k60 grants · $6.0M
  • $250k+10 grants · $12M
$65,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$145M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRO FOOTBALL HALL OF FAME$2,500,000
CANTON PALACE THEATER ASSOCIATION$2,500,000
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$2,400,000
THE CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART$1,320,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EAST CENTRAL OHIO$1,250,000
REFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES$700,000
STARK COUNTY DISTRICT LIBRARY$602,970
PRO FOOTBALL HALL OF FAME$500,000
HOPE$275,000
GROVE CITY COLLEGE$250,000
SNEHA BHARATHI EDUCATION SOCIETY$235,000
ROTARY CLUB OF MADRAS CHARITABLE TRUST$225,000
STARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC$208,861
YMCA OF CENTRAL STARK COUNTY$200,000
FRIENDS OF STARK PARKS$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 84% of grant dollars ($114M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 16% that went abroad ($21M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOUSTON'S AMAZING PLACE INC: $40k → 16%ANDERSON AREA YMCA: $150k → 15%SINGLE MOMM: $75k → 10%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN INC: $49k → 14%WHETSTONE BOYS RANCH: $51k → 19%ECHOING HILLS VILLAGE INC: $75k → 15%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $200k → 17%SILVER SPRINGS MARTIN LUTHER SCHOOL: $30k → 7%MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $60k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $55k → 15%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE GRAND TRAVERSE AREA: $51k → 7%CARE TO LEARN: $70k → 15%COMMUNITY RENEWAL TEAM INC: $58k → 11%LEAST OF THESE CAROLINAS: $100k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS - CLEVELAND: $100k → 17%WHATCOM COUNCIL ON AGING: $30k → 12%MONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 9%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $100k → 12%TIFFIN COMMUNITY - YMCA RECREATION CENTER INC: $150k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS - CLEVELAND: $50k → 17%DREW LEWIS FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $35k → 10%CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO: $100k → 10%MIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS: $125k → 7%WARRIORS HELPING WARRIORS INC: $35k → 10%UNION COUNTY YMCA: $55k → 18%TIFFIN COMMUNITY - YMCA RECREATION CENTER INC: $100k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON AREA: $90k → 16%KIDS PLACE INC: $50k → 12%FAMILY SHELTER SERVICE INC: $31k → 7%RUTHERFORD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $35k → 16%KEENE FAMILY YMCA: $51k → 9%YMCA OF CENTRAL STARK COUNTY: $200k → 13%THE VILLAGE LEARNING & ACHIEVEMENT CENTER: $75k → 16%CRAWFORD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $40k → 15%FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER INC: $51k → 15%FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER INC: $50k → 15%FAMILY VIOLIENCE CENTER INC: $39k → 15%YMCA OF CENTRAL STARK COUNTY: $50k → 13%US VETS HOUSTON: $50k → 16%EARLY CHILDHOOD RESOURCE CENTER: $150k → 13%THE GOLDEN KEY CENTER FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN INC: $500k → 13%COMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $2.0M → 13%CANTON FOR ALL PEOPLE: $998k → 13%COMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $800k → 13%COMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $800k → 13%COMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $350k → 13%CANTON FOR ALL PEOPLE: $250k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
IL
WI
MI
NV
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
DE
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 16% of all-years giving ($21M)

13 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$5.6M · 45 grants
China$4.1M · 43 grants
France$2.9M · 36 grants
Romania$2.4M · 27 grants
Poland$2.0M · 19 grants
Italy$1.5M · 25 grants
Germany$1.2M · 14 grants
Canada$548k · 12 grants
Mexico$271k · 3 grants
South Africa$170k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Timken Foundation of Canton’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 59% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 57%.

Timken Foundation of Cantonlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 16% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$80M · 137 repeat orgs$52M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

137 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 102 since wound down; 73 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

137
499

Total granted

$80M
$39M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+14%

Still filing today

61%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PUTNAM FOUNDATION DBA TIMKEN MUSEUM OF ART
    5× · 2019–2023 · $6.4M · revenue +38% · 81% of their budget
  • CP
    CANTON PALACE THEATRE ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2018–2025 · $5.3M · revenue +14%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2021 · $3.2M · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • NO
    NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $1.6M · revenue +39% · 31% of their budget
  • HC
    HARRIS COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT NO 24
    one grant, 2018 · $1.3M
  • MU
    MALONE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $1.2M · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Cleveland County Inc

The United Way of Cleveland County helps people by uniting resources and programs to responsibly meet the needs of our community.

Philanthropy
2
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
3
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
4
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
5
Craftsbury Community Care Center

Residential care home for elderly and handicapped.

Human Services
6
Cedar Valley United Way

Uniting our community to empower individuals and families to thrive.

Philanthropy
7
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
8
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
9
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
10
Central Maine Medical Center

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
11
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

—
12
Rumford Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut; the most unlike its peers is Williams & Dollard Community Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

383 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 383 of the 722 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

38
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
82
Early backer (in before they grew)
374/383
Grantees still filing
248/383
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $16,031,399 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $3,600,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERAULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $3,000,000 · OtherAULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATIONPRO FOOTBALL HALL OF FAME: $3,000,000 · OtherPRO FOOTBALL HALL OF FAMEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO: $2,380,000 · Other+128 more: $27,933,442 · Other+128 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION: $3,200,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF A…CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $2,400,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERV…STARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,281,120 · EducationSTARK STATE COLLEGE…KENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · EducationKENT STATE UNIVERSI…NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,637,628 · EducationNORTHEAST OHIO MEDI…STARK EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,608,275 · EducationSTARK EDUCATION PAR…University of Mount Union: $1,200,000 · EducationUniversity of Mount…MALONE UNIVERSITY: $1,200,000 · EducationMALONE UNIVERSITY+13 more: $3,453,673 · Education+13 moreTHE PUTNAM FOUNDATION DBA TIMKEN MUSEUM OF ART: $6,422,019 · Arts & CultureTHE PUTNAM FOUNDATI…CANTON PALACE THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $5,275,000 · Arts & CultureCANTON PALACE THEAT…ARTS IN STARK: $1,478,775 · Arts & CultureARTS IN STARKCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $1,320,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF…The Musical Arts Association: $1,026,453 · Arts & CultureThe Musical Arts As…CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $896,452 · Arts & Culture+10 more: $2,188,875 · Arts & Culture+10 moreCOMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $3,950,000 · Human ServicesCANTON FOR ALL PEOPLE INC: $1,248,159 · Human ServicesTHE GOLDEN KEY CENTER FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN INC: $500,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $480,000 · Human Services+9 more: $1,491,008 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER OF AKRON: $2,000,000 · HealthCLEVELAND CLINIC MERCY HOSPITAL: $400,000 · HealthSpartanburg Regional Healthcare System Foundation: $256,525 · HealthCOLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC: $250,000 · HealthCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $135,000 · HealthPATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN: $125,000 · Health+3 more: $315,000 · HealthSTARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $1,694,489 · Community ImprovementTeam NEO Foundation: $1,125,000 · Community ImprovementMANUFACTURING ADVOCACY & GROWTH NETWORK INC: $250,000 · Community ImprovementTHE HEALTHY BOURBON COUNTY ACTION T: $160,000 · Community ImprovementSTARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,250,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS: $250,000 · PhilanthropyWAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF RUTHERFORD COUNTY INC: $121,000 · Philanthropy
Other$55,944,841Education$18,980,696Arts & Culture$18,607,574Human Services$7,669,167Health$3,481,525Community Improvement$3,229,489Philanthropy$2,821,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PUTNAM FOUNDATION DBA TIMKEN MUSEUM OF ART: $6,422,019 over 5y, 81% of budgetCANTON PALACE THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $5,275,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetCOMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $3,950,000 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION: $3,200,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $2,400,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO: $2,380,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetSTARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,281,120 over 4y, 42% of budgetSTARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,250,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetKENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER OF AKRON: $2,000,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $1,694,489 over 5y, 47% of budgetNORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,637,628 over 1y, 31% of budgetSTARK EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,608,275 over 3y, 41% of budgetARTS IN STARK: $1,478,775 over 3y, 39% of budgetREFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES: $1,430,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $1,320,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCANTON FOR ALL PEOPLE INC: $1,248,159 over 2y, 19% of budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $1,200,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $1,200,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTeam NEO Foundation: $1,125,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association: $1,026,453 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF MASSILLON INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $896,452 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPEGASUS FARM: $730,095 over 2y, 35% of budgetWORKSHOPS FOR WARRIORS INC: $700,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetJ R COLEMAN SENIOR OUTREACH: $700,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $500,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetTHE GOLDEN KEY CENTER FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN INC: $500,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $480,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANTON COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $455,641 over 1y, 14% of budgetNORTH CANTON PLAYHOUSE: $362,500 over 1y, 38% of budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $350,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCanton Museum of Art: $318,500 over 3y, 11% of budgetICAN INC: $318,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetLIMESTONE UNIVERSITY: $300,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJ Babe Stearn Community Center: $300,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetSTARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $278,175 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetSpartanburg Regional Healthcare System Foundation: $256,525 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMASSILLON MUSEUM: $250,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetMANUFACTURING ADVOCACY & GROWTH NETWORK INC: $250,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BUCYRUS-TIFFIN INC: $250,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA of Central Stark County: $250,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK: $209,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC RANDOLPH-ASHEBORO: $205,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community FoundationOH97× affinity58 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · The Paul and Carol David Foundation · The Belden Brick Charitable Trust · Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation · Henry & Louise Timken Foundation · Albert W & Edith V Flowers Charitable · Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Stark County · Mascoma Bank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Timken Foundation of Canton funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Timken Foundation of Canton. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Community Renewal Team Inc: 77% of income from government
  • Goodwin University Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Edge for Tomorrow: 7% of income from government
  • Gaylord Hospital Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Hartford Stage Company Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Cover Home Repair Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Klein Memorial Auditorium Foundationinc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
80report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Timken Foundation of Canton?

Find your warmest path to Timken Foundation of Canton through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 722 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Timken Foundation of Canton’s filings →

More from the funding graph