Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tim and Maureen Hunter Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$120kEmployment$75kHousing & Shelter$72kReligion$36kArts & Culture$35kHuman Services$10kHealth$9kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$677k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Housing Forward$25,000
Cara Chicago$20,000
Old Town School$10,000
A House in Austin$5,000
St Giles Church$5,000
St Giles School$2,500
ISU Foundation$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Ladder Up$1,000
Erie Family Health Foundation$1,000
Art Institute of Chicago$550
BEAT THE STREETS CHICAGO$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Sarahs Inn$500
Frank Lloyd Wright TrustTrust$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Sarah's Inn: $500 → 14%Inspiration Corporation: $250 → 14%Sarah's Inn: $500 → 14%Inspiration Corporation: $250 → 14%Sarahs Inn: $500 → 14%Inspiration Corporation: $250 → 14%Sarahs Inn: $500 → 14%Inspiration Corporation: $250 → 14%Sarah's Inn: $500 → 14%Inspiration Corporation: $250 → 14%Inspiration Corporation: $250 → 14%Miseracordia Founddation: $250 → 14%Chicago Furniture Bank: $150 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
WI
NY
IA
OH
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$366k · 32 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
22

Total granted

$366k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+5%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Cara Program
    6× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +83%
  • HF
    HOUSING FORWARD
    6× · 2020–2025 · $68k · revenue +68%
  • AH
    A HOUSE IN AUSTIN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $56k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • WS
    WEST SIDE CONNECTOR
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • OI
    OPRF Infant Welfare Society
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • AA
    ALS Association Ohio
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
2
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
3
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
4
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
5
Center for Housing and Health

Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
6
Volunteers of America of Illinois

Volunteers of america of illinois partners with the people we serve to create transformational and lasting change in their lives through programs that support, empower, and transform.

—
7
Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for

Providing academic support to children experiencing homelessness in Chicago and providing resources and services to families experiencing homelessness in Chicago.

Education
8
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
9
Aids Foundation of Chicago

The aids foundation of chicago mobilizes communities to create equity and justice for people living with and vulnerable to hiv and related chronic disease.

Health
10
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
11
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
12
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Architecture Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Vietnam Veterans of America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
21/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Old Town School: $56,950 · OtherOld Town SchoolSt Giles Church: $35,950 · OtherSt Giles ChurchSt Giles School: $12,600 · OtherSt Giles SchoolIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · OtherFrank Lloyd Wright TrustTrust: $5,750 · Other+36 more: $24,751 · Other+36 moreThe Cara Program: $75,000 · EmploymentThe Cara ProgramHOUSING FORWARD: $68,250 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING FORWARD+1 more: $2,250 · Housing & ShelterA HOUSE IN AUSTIN: $55,783 · EducationA HOUSE IN AUSTINLADDER UP (F/K/A CITY-WIDE TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM): $7,000 · EducationLADDER UP (F/K/A CIT…THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $2,900 · EducationIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,750 · Education+2 more: $500 · EducationErie Family Health Foundation Inc: $5,000 · HealthWEST SIDE CONNECTOR: $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,250 · Health+3 more: $600 · HealthSARAH'S INN: $2,500 · Human ServicesInspiration Corporation: $1,500 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $250 · Human ServicesCHICAGO FURNITURE BANK: $150 · Human ServicesChicago Architecture Foundation: $1,500 · Arts & CultureURBAN GATEWAYS: $1,000 · Arts & CultureFRANK LLOYD WRIGHT TRUST: $750 · Arts & CultureChicago Humanities Festival: $500 · Arts & CultureBANDWITH MUSIC LTD: $250 · Arts & Culture
Other$142,501Employment$75,000Housing & Shelter$70,500Education$68,933Health$11,850Human Services$4,400Arts & Culture$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Cara Program: $75,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSING FORWARD: $68,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetA HOUSE IN AUSTIN: $55,783 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetLADDER UP (F/K/A CITY-WIDE TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM): $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetErie Family Health Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWEST SIDE CONNECTOR: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $2,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH'S INN: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLARINDA FOUNDATION INC: $1,840 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBUILD INC: $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetInspiration Corporation: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Architecture Foundation: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN GATEWAYS: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRANK LLOYD WRIGHT TRUST: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Humanities Festival: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVE COUNSELING CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBANDWITH MUSIC LTD: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURE DUCHENNE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHorizons for Youth: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO FURNITURE BANK: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $143 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNO LIMITS FOUNDATION D/B/A CAMP NO LIMITS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Cara Program ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds A HOUSE IN AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds LADDER UP (F/K/A CITY-WIDE TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM) ↗
  • Who funds Erie Family Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE CONNECTOR ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SARAH'S INN ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds CLARINDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILD INC ↗
  • Who funds Inspiration Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Architecture Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN GATEWAYS ↗
  • Who funds FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BEAT THE STREETS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Humanities Festival ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AFS-USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL23.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Good Heart Work Smart Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Oak Park-River Forest Community Foundation · Joseph R & Helen Shaker Family Foundation · Healthy Communities Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · T Kendall Hunt Family Foundation Inc · Carol Bernick Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tim and Maureen Hunter Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tim and Maureen Hunter Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tim and Maureen Hunter Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tim and Maureen Hunter Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tim and Maureen Hunter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph