Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tillie & Alfred Shemanski Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$39kEducation$37kReligion$19kArts & Culture$17kEmployment$6kHealth$3kHuman Services$3kYouth Development$300Other$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
5
States reached
$338k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE$7,450
JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY IN WASHINGTON$4,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE$2,000
THE SEATTLE FOUNDATION$1,000
UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY$500
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$300
TEMPLE DE HIRSCH SINAI$300
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$300
SEATTLE UNIVERSITY$300
CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON$200
HEBREW UNION COLLEGE$200
CITY OF HOPE$200
SEATTLE TIMES FUND FOR THE NEEDY$100
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY$100
MARCH OF DIMES$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $750) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BOYS TOWN (GIRLS & BOYS TOWN): $50 → 12%BOYS TOWN (GIRLS & BOYS TOWN): $50 → 12%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $200 → 9%BOYS TOWN (GIRLS & BOYS TOWN): $50 → 12%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $200 → 9%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $200 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$57k · 19 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$57k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+26%

Still filing today

42%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    Holocaust Center For Humanity
    2× · 2018–2019 · $16k · revenue +121%
  • SU
    SEATTLE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +62%
  • SA
    SEATTLE ART MUSEUM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $900 · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • CS
    College Success Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -14%
  • TA
    TILLIE & ALFRED SHEMANSKI TESTAMENTARY TRUST
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue +9%
  • HF
    HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Mothers of Metropolitan Seattle
Religion
2
Hillel Foundation for Jewish Life at the University of Washington

The mission of Hillel at the University of Washington (Hillel UW) is to inspire students and young adults (ages 18-35) to explore, embrace, and celebrate Jewish life and identity.

—
3
Seattle University Foundation

Fundraising activities to support Seattle University

—
4
Seattle Children's Foundation

Seattle children's foundation exists to improve the quality of health care services to infants, children, and adolescents through contributions to organizations providing health care services, research and education.

—
5
Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Seattle Chapter

Arcs foundation advances science and technology in the united states by providing financial awards to academically outstanding u.s. citizens studying to complete degrees in science, engineering and medical research.

Education
6
Jewish Family Service

Mission: Inspired by their history and values, Jewish Family Service supports the needs of Jewish individuals and families, refugees and immigrants, and the broader community to achieve well-being, health, and stability. From food security…

Human Services
7
Seattle Christian School Association

Seattle christian schools is committed to providing a premier, christ-centered education for k-12 students. blessed with a legacy of over 70 years of god's provision and leading, students benefit from an unparalleled educational…

Education
8
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
9
Waldorf School Assoc of Seattle

The seattle waldorf school mission is: daily we strive to inspire learning, courage, and joy in the developing human being.

Education
10
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
11
Seattle Athenaeum

The Seattle Athenaeum connects a dynamic literary community through a curated book collection, diverse programming, and opportunities for engaging conversations and transformative ideas.

Education
12
Seattle Colleges Foundation

The seattle colleges foundation catalyzes community support to advance the mission, work and impact of seattle colleges. we engage our community to transform lives, promote equity and increase access to quality, affordable education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Tillie & Alfred Shemanski Testamentary Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Holocaust Center For Humanity: $16,000 · OtherHolocaust Center For HumanityUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $15,200 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONTILLIE & ALFRED SHEMANSKI TESTAMENTARY TRUST: $11,000 · OtherTILLIE & ALFRED SHEMANSKI TESTAMENTARY TRUSTSEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $5,200 · OtherSEATTLE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY IN WASHINGTON: $4,000 · OtherJEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY IN WASHINGTONCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM: $3,000 · OtherSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $2,700 · OtherTEMPLE DE HIRSCH SINAI: $2,700 · Other+11 more: $9,900 · Other+11 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE: $16,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLEHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATIONSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $9,000 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATIONASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE: $7,450 · PhilanthropyASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLEUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $4,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY+1 more: $800 · PhilanthropyCollege Success Foundation: $15,000 · EducationCollege Succ…BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $900 · EducationBRANDEIS UNI…Dress for Success Seattle: $6,000 · EmploymentMARCH OF DIMES INC: $1,000 · HealthSEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $900 · Arts & CultureCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $600 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $150 · Human Services
Other$74,700Philanthropy$47,750Education$15,900Employment$6,000Health$1,000Arts & Culture$900Human Services$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHolocaust Center For Humanity: $16,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCollege Success Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTILLIE & ALFRED SHEMANSKI TESTAMENTARY TRUST: $11,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE: $7,450 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDress for Success Seattle: $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $5,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $1,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEATTLE TIMES COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND: $800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE ↗
  • Who funds Holocaust Center For Humanity ↗
  • Who funds College Success Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TILLIE & ALFRED SHEMANSKI TESTAMENTARY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE ↗
  • Who funds Dress for Success Seattle ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE SEATTLE TIMES COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Tillie & Alfred Shemanski Testamentary Trust · Samis Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tillie & Alfred Shemanski Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tillie & Alfred Shemanski Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tillie & Alfred Shemanski’s filings →

More from the funding graph