Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tighe Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$182k
Granted FY2020
44
Grants FY2020
7
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2020.

Philanthropy$105kEducation$84kHuman Services$36kHealth$24kReligion$11kCommunity Improvement$6kYouth Development$5kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2020 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k41 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$468
Median grant
7
States reached
$984k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Vanguard Charitable Trust$85,000
University of Pittsburgh$28,000
Scranton Area Foundation$10,000
St Joseph's House$6,000
Fred's Footsteps$5,500
Brighter Horizon Foundation$5,000
University of Scranton$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ASHP Foundation$5,000
TJUH Foundation$5,000
St Margarets Church$4,000
Catholic Charities Appeal$3,500
Philadelphia Community Corps$3,000
St Margaret's School$2,000
Catholic Relief Services$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%St Joseph's House: $6k → 6%St Joseph's House: $5k → 6%St Joseph's Center Foundation: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
MO
MD
AR
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Tighe Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 94%.

Tighe Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$128k · 24 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
20

Total granted

$128k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+2%

Still filing today

42%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20
EducationHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    2× · 2018–2020 · $59k · revenue +40%
  • SJ
    St Josephs House Inc
    2× · 2018–2020 · $11k · revenue +32%
  • H'
    HOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $500 · revenue +576%

Funded once

  • CI
    COMMONLIT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +141%
  • JH
    Jefferson Health Institutional Advancement
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE AND PIKE COUNTIES
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
4
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
5
Carlow University

See schedule o.carlow university, rooted in its catholic identity and embodying the heritage and values of the sisters of mercy, offers transformational educational opportunities for a diverse community of learners and empowers them to…

Education
6
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
7
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
8
Share Food Program

As the largest serving hunger-relief organization in the greater philadelphia region, share food program's mission is reducing regional food insecurity by providing nourishing food to a network of community-based partners and directly to…

Food & Nutrition
9
Children's Scholarship Fund Philadelphia

With over 20 years of experience and over 30,000 scholarships awarded, csfp provides philadelphia children with eight-year, needs-based scholarships to attend safe, quality, k-8th grade schools. continued on schedule o.supporting…

Education
10
Mercy Catholic Medical Center of Southeastern Pennsylvania

We, trinity health of the mid-atlantic region and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy catholic medical center of southeastern…

Health
11
Feeding Pennsylvania

Feeding pennsylvania is the partner state association of feeding america food banks. it is our mission to promote and aid our members in securing food and other resources to reduce hunger and food insecurity for their communities and…

Philanthropy
12
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scranton Area Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Vanguard Charitable Trust: $85,000 · OtherVanguard Charitable TrustFred's Footsteps: $16,500 · OtherFred's FootstepsASHP Foundation: $10,000 · OtherASHP FoundationSt Margarets Church: $7,750 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES APPEAL OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF PHILADELPHIA: $6,500 · Other+38 more: $44,098 · Other+38 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $59,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHCOMMONLIT INC: $10,000 · EducationCOMMONLIT INCUniversity of Scranton: $5,000 · EducationUniversity of Scranton+3 more: $800 · EducationSCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropySCRANTON …BRIGHTER HORIZON FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyBRIGHTER …IMPACT100 PHILADELPHIA INC: $2,875 · PhilanthropyIMPACT100…+1 more: $50 · PhilanthropySt Josephs House Inc: $11,000 · Human ServicesST JOSEPHS CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesSUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION: $500 · Human ServicesPHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY CORPS: $3,000 · Community ImprovementTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $250 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200 · HealthVOLUNTEER MEDICAL SERV CORPS OF LM & NAR: $150 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 · HealthPhilabundance: $450 · Food & NutritionCARING FOR FRIENDS: $100 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $50 · Food & Nutrition
Other$169,848Education$74,800Philanthropy$22,925Human Services$12,500Community Improvement$3,000Health$700Food & Nutrition$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $59,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSt Josephs House Inc: $11,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMONLIT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE AND PIKE COUNTIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHTER HORIZON FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUniversity of Scranton: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT100 PHILADELPHIA INC: $2,875 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPRING BREAK FOR AUTISM: $2,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetST JOSEPHS CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIRISH EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDARBY CREEK VALLEY ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAVALON RESCUE SQUAD INC: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM UP PHILLY: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER MEDICAL SERV CORPS OF LM & NAR: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARING FOR FRIENDS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNARBERTH COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds SCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds St Josephs House Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMONLIT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE AND PIKE COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTER HORIZON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Scranton ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY CORPS ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT100 PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRING BREAK FOR AUTISM ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPHS CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IRISH EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chubb Charitable FoundationPA20× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chubb Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Philadelphia Foundation · Oppenheim Foundation · Eureka Foundation · The Hawk Family Foundation · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Connelly Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tighe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tighe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tighe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph