Skip to content
Tiger Global Impact Ventures Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Tiger Global Impact Ventures Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$22MCommunity Improvement$11MPhilanthropy$7.6MHuman Services$4.5MFood & Nutrition$4.5MScience & Tech$3.0MYouth Development$1.6MInternational$1.5MOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
  • $250k+16 grants · $12M
$376,990
Median grant
7
States reached
$49M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAST MILE EDUCATION FUND$2,000,000
TECHBRIDGE GIRLS - GET FUND$1,500,000
ALL RAISE$1,330,000
CAMBIAR EDUCATION$1,260,000
MARCY LAB INC$1,000,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$1,000,000
NATIVES RISING INC$600,000
Individual grant recipient$500,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED$450,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE$376,990
GREENHOUSE SCHOLARS$300,000
WOMEN IN REVENUE$300,000
ONE EARTH PHILANTHROPY$250,000
AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC$250,000
CITY YEAR$250,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $11.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE RIVER FUND NEW YORK INC: $250k → 13%LAST MILE EDUCATION FUND: $2.0M → 12%THE RIVER FUND NEW YORK INC: $250k → 13%LAST MILE EDUCATION FUND: $2.0M → 12%WOMEN IN REVENUE: $1.0M → 10%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION INC: $3k → 14%THE RIVER FUND: $150k → 13%LAST MILE EDUCATION FUND: $2.0M → 12%WOMEN IN REVENUE: $1.0M → 10%THE RIVER FUND: $100k → 13%WOMEN IN REVENUE: $700k → 10%WOMEN IN REVENUE: $300k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $625k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $325k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $25k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC: $350k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Tiger Global Impact Ventures Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Tiger Global Impact Ventures Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$41M · 26 repeat orgs$16M to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
33

Total granted

$41M
$14M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+17%

Still filing today

92%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LAST MILE EDUCATION FUND
    3× · 2022–2024 · $6.0M · revenue +100% · 27% of their budget
  • AR
    ALL RAISE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +143% · 63% of their budget
  • HF
    HIM FOR HER INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $3.0M · revenue +9% · 40% of their budget

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF BENGALURU
    one grant, 2021 · $2.0M
  • GE
    GLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1.5M · revenue +78%
  • HH
    HUNGER HEROS
    one grant, 2021 · $1.2M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
2
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
3
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
4
The New York Opportunity Network Inc Dba the Opportunity Network

The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Technyc Inc

An engaged network of tech leaders working to foster a dynamic, diverse, and creative new york. we bring together new yorkers to support a successful technology ecosystem, attract and retain top-tier talent, and celebrate new york and the…

Community Improvement
9
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
10
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
11
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
12
Technoserve Inc

Technoserve's mission is to fight poverty by helping people build regenerative farms, businesses, and markets that increase incomes.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Year Inc; the most unlike its peers is Answer the Call. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/52
Grantees still filing
34/52
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Techbridge Girls: $4,750,000 · EducationTechbridge GirlsMARCY LAB INC: $3,000,000 · EducationMARCY LAB INCCAMBIAR EDUCATION: $2,400,000 · EducationCAMBIAR EDUCATIONGREENHOUSE SCHOLARS: $1,550,000 · EducationGREENHOUSE SCHOLARSGLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP NETWORK: $1,500,000 · EducationGLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP NET…ECHOING GREEN INC: $1,000,000 · EducationECHOING GREEN INCMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $850,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of …+4 more: $460,000 · EducationUNITED WAY OF BENGALURU: $2,000,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF BENGALURUTECHBRIDGE GIRLS - GET FUND: $1,500,000 · OtherTECHBRIDGE GIRLS - GET FUNDHUNGER HEROS: $1,180,000 · OtherHUNGER HEROSIndividual grant recipient: $1,010,000 · OtherSTARFISH INSTITUTE: $1,000,000 · OtherOUTSCHOOL ORG: $1,000,000 · OtherDIDTECHNOLOGY INC: $1,950,000 · OtherDIDTECHNOLOGY INCAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $1,951,136 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEM…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $875,000 · OtherAIRBNBORG INC: $1,250,000 · OtherAIRBNBORG INCUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF NIAGARA COUNTY INC: $1,000,000 · Other+26 more: $6,334,388 · Other+26 moreLAST MILE EDUCATION FUND: $6,000,000 · Human ServicesLAST MILE EDUCATION…Women in Revenue Inc: $3,000,000 · Human ServicesWomen in Revenue In…THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $975,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S AID …THE RIVER FUND NEW YORK INC: $750,000 · Human ServicesTHE RIVER FUND NEW …+2 more: $352,500 · Human ServicesALL RAISE: $3,430,000 · Community ImprovementALL RAISENATIVES RISING INC: $1,200,000 · Community ImprovementNATIVES R…FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $625,000 · Community ImprovementFOOD BANK…TIDES FOUNDATION: $3,000,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOU…AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,810,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN …ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $250,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $25,000 · PhilanthropyHIM FOR HER INC: $3,000,000 · EmploymentCITY HARVEST INC: $1,125,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $625,000 · Food & NutritionNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $250,000 · Food & NutritionRETHINK FOOD USA INC: $250,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$15,510,000Other$21,050,524Human Services$11,077,500Community Improvement$5,255,000Philanthropy$5,085,000Employment$3,000,000Food & Nutrition$2,250,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAST MILE EDUCATION FUND: $6,000,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetTechbridge Girls: $4,750,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetALL RAISE: $3,430,000 over 3y, 63% of budgetHIM FOR HER INC: $3,000,000 over 3y, 40% of budgetWomen in Revenue Inc: $3,000,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $3,000,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMARCY LAB INC: $3,000,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetCAMBIAR EDUCATION: $2,400,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $1,951,136 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetDIDTECHNOLOGY INC: $1,950,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,810,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREENHOUSE SCHOLARS: $1,550,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetGLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP NETWORK: $1,500,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetAIRBNBORG INC: $1,250,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetNATIVES RISING INC: $1,200,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $1,125,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetECHOING GREEN INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF NIAGARA COUNTY INC: $1,000,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $975,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $875,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $850,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RIVER FUND NEW YORK INC: $750,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $625,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFeeding America: $625,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPYXERA GLOBAL INC: $500,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $500,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE EARTH PHILANTHROPY: $500,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetCENTRE FOR WILDLIFE STUDIES INC: $500,000 over 2y, 45% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $375,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetPROJECT HOSPITALITY INC: $350,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC: $350,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNew York University: $250,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR WILDLIFE STUDIES: $250,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $250,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetRETHINK FOOD USA INC: $250,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetSUGi FOUNDATION: $225,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetWELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS INC: $125,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetChinese for Affirmative Action: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMASA-MEXED INC: $100,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetSTARTOUT: $100,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetFEEDING FLORIDA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNETWORK FOR TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTURN 2 FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Hopper-Dean FoundationViking Global Foundat…Ewing Marion Kauffman…Robin Hood FoundationThe Chicago Community…Tides FoundationThe Ford FoundationSeattle FoundationCalifornia Community …National Philanthropi…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA21.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Hopper-Dean Foundation · Viking Global Foundation Inc · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Tides Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Seattle Foundation · California Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tiger Global Impact Ventures Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tiger Global Impact Ventures Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Feeding Florida Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Centre for Wildlife Studies Inc: 20% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tiger Global Impact Ventures Inc?

Find your warmest path to Tiger Global Impact Ventures Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tiger Global Impact Ventures’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home