Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Threshold Coc

THRESHOLD COC mobilizes, advocates, and empowers community collaboration towards ending homelessness and fosters an effective system of crisis response, homelessness prevention, and intervention in the greater omaha-council bluffs metropolitan area.

$9.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$796k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Housing & Shelter$34MPhilanthropy$7.8MCrime & Legal$1.3MYouth Development$450kHuman Services$349kReligion$18k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $3,439,836 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,298,930 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,859,094 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $731k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.7M
$175,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REIMAGINE$796,250
TOGETHER INC$775,000
FAMILY HOUSING ADVISORY SERVICES INC$437,500
THE NEBRASKA LAWYERS FOUNDATION$339,268
SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE$327,500
LEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA$200,000
NEW VISIONS HOMELESS SERVICES$175,000
COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$114,000
HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE$110,000
MICAH HOUSE$81,568
WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT$50,000
YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES$17,500
THE BRIDGE FAMILY RESOURCE AND CONNECTOR NETWORK (THE BRIDGE FRC)$10,000
HEART MINISTRY$6,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $14.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NEW VISIONS HOMELESS SERVICES: $359k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $243k → 12%NEW VISIONS HOMELESS SERVICES: $312k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $204k → 12%NEW VISIONS HOMELESS SERVICES: $175k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $38k → 12%NEW VISIONS: $27k → 12%NEW VISIONS HOMELESS SERVICES: $9k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE: $300k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE: $188k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $303k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $297k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $126k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $110k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $81k → 12%JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS NEBRASKA: $9k → 12%TOGETHER INC: $8.7M → 12%TOGETHER INC: $775k → 12%TOGETHER INC: $774k → 12%TOGETHER INC: $548k → 12%TOGETHER INC: $248k → 12%TOGETHER INC: $25k → 12%WOMENS CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $90k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $55k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $50k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $27k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $18k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $18k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $10k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $9k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$42M · 23 repeat orgs$109k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
6

Total granted

$42M
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+169%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyCrime & LegalArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $13M · revenue +28%
  • TI
    TOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $11M · revenue +106% · 37% of their budget
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $8.9M · revenue +119% · 55% of their budget

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF BELLEVUE HUMAN SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $36k
  • ND
    NEBRASKA DEPT OF VETERAN'S AFFAIRS
    one grant, 2020 · $27k
  • NW
    NEBRASKA WESTERN IOWA VA HEALTH CARE
    one grant, 2021 · $9k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
2
New Community Development Corporation

Provides safe, affordable and quality housing for low and moderate income families in Douglas & Sarpy NE & Pottawattamie County IA, with an emphasis in Omaha/Council Bluffs metropolitan area.

Housing & Shelter
3
Community Justice Center

A restorative justice agency committed to habilitating justice in nebraska.

Crime & Legal
4
Community Action of Nebraska Inc

Mission: community action of nebraska strives to alleviate poverty through enhancing program development, providing technical assistance, and advocating public policy to support all community action agencies in nebraska.

Community Improvement
5
Friendship Home of Lincoln Inc

To provide emergency shelter

Human Services
6
North Omaha Collective

To build the capacity of youth serving organizations, service providers, families and community to claim their voice, cultivate healing and take courageous action to improve their overall health and well being.

Human Services
7
Urban League of Nebraska

The mission of the urban league of nebraska is to be an empowering voice in the community advocating for economic self-reliance, parity, power, civil rights and equal opportunity for all (see schedule o). the vision of the urban league of…

Human Services
8
Refugee Empowerment Center

To resettle refugees in nebraska and provide them the support they need to thrive.

—
9
Lincoln County Community Development Corporation

To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.

Philanthropy
10
Family Promise of Greater Des Moines

To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness

—
11
Nebraska Alliance of Child Advocacy Centers

To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.

Crime & Legal
12
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heartland Family Service and the most unlike its peers is Youth Emergency Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr17%11%20–35yr12%26%35–55yr17%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%3%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr17%4%20–35yr12%52%35–55yr17%38%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
11%
388/3,531

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA — $11,044,583 · Human ServicesTOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHAMetro Housing Collective — $1,203,250 · Human ServicesMetro Housing CollectiveHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE — $916,817 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICENew Visions Homeless Services — $881,792 · Human ServicesNew Visions Homeless Services+5 more — $1,258,530 · Human Services+5 moreUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $12,746,214 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDSOmaha Community Foundation — $1,108,044 · PhilanthropyOmaha Community Foundation+1 more — $90,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC — $8,866,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC+10 more — $580,719 · Other+10 moreSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $1,020,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY HOUSING ADVISORY SERVICES — $963,764 · Housing & ShelterMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION — $360,568 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE NEBRASKA LAWYERS FOUNDATION — $780,713 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA — $520,224 · Crime & LegalHEART MINISTRY CENTER — $646,890 · Food & NutritionLift Up Sarpy County — $450,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$15,304,972Philanthropy$13,944,258Other$9,447,219Housing & Shelter$2,394,332Crime & Legal$1,300,937Food & Nutrition$646,890Youth Development$450,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $12,746,214 over 3y, 22% of budgetTOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA — $11,044,583 over 5y, 37% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC — $8,866,500 over 5y, 55% of budgetMetro Housing Collective — $1,203,250 over 2y, 45% of budgetOmaha Community Foundation — $1,108,044 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $1,020,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetFAMILY HOUSING ADVISORY SERVICES — $963,764 over 5y, 19% of budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE — $916,817 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetNew Visions Homeless Services — $881,792 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetTHE NEBRASKA LAWYERS FOUNDATION — $780,713 over 3y, 62% of budgetHEART MINISTRY CENTER — $646,890 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetLEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA — $520,224 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC — $488,089 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE — $485,100 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLift Up Sarpy County — $450,000 over 3y, 37% of budgetMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION — $360,568 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetEASTERN NEBRASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP — $201,089 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT — $158,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF OMAHA NEBRASKA — $144,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC — $118,341 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetGeneration Diamond Corporation — $90,630 over 2y, 12% of budgetNEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN CENTER INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEAST AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF NEBRASKA — $45,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FAMILY RESOURCE CONNECTOR NETWORK (FKA BUILDING BRIGHT FUTURES) — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA — $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationThe Sherwood Foundati…United Way of the Mid…Mutual of Omaha Found…Robert B Daugherty Fo…Nebraska Community Fo…Suzanne & Walter Scot…The Hawks FoundationLeland J & Dorothy H …Todd and Mary Heistan…Immanuel Community Vi…Weitz Family Foundati…
The Lozier FoundationNE46.7× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Threshold Coc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines