Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thornton Jordan Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$106kPhilanthropy$50kHousing & Shelter$29kInternational$21kHuman Services$21kEducation$16kFood & Nutrition$16kYouth Development$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$653k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
ACLU$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
FEEDING THE VALLEY$5,000
UNITED WAY OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY$5,000
GIRLS INC$1,000
ANN ELIZABETH SHEPHERD HOME$1,000
HOUSE OF MERCY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
COLUMBUS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$1,000
HISTORIC LINWOOD FOUNDATION$1,000
RIVERDALE PORTERDALE CEMETERY FOUNDATION$1,000
GREENPEACE FUND$1,000
MOBILITY WORLDWIDE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PROJECT LINUS: $500 → 8%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$329k · 27 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
13

Total granted

$329k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+115%

Still filing today

59%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $57k · revenue +449%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +23%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • HO
    House of Heroes Chattahoochee
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -30%
  • NA
    NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +167%
  • RA
    RLA ACADEMY
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Historic Atlanta Inc

Historic atlanta advances social justice and community by saving historic places

Environment
2
Georgia Hospital Association

The georgia hospital association (gha) serves approximately 150 hospitals throughout georgia. its purpose is to promote the health and welfare of the public through the development of better health care for all of georgia's citizens. gha…

—
3
The Columbus Museum Inc

The columbus museum brings american art and history to life for the communities of the chattahoochee valley.

Arts & Culture
4
Columbus Historic Preservation Trust

Preservation, Display and use of Historic buildings

Unclassified
5
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

The purpose of the greater columbus chamber of commerce is to promote and develop civic, educational, commercial and industrial interests in columbus, georgia and certain surrounding areas.

—
6
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
7
Community Foundation of W Georgia

To enhance the quality of life for the people of the west georgia area.

Philanthropy
8
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Chattanooga Area Inc

Habitat for humanity of greater chattanooga (hfh-gc) brings together businesses, churches, and other community organizations in partnership with low income families to spark authentic transformation in our city through the construction of…

Housing & Shelter
9
The Grady Health Foundation Inc

The mission of the grady health foundation is to grow both philanthropic support and broad-based understanding of the critical role that grady health system plays in the metro atlanta region. our focus is to ensure grady health system has…

Philanthropy
10
Georgia Advanced Technology Ventures Inc

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…

Education
11
Preserve Chattanooga Inc Formerly Cornerstones Inc

To protect the architectural heritage of chattanooga through historic preservation, advocacy, and education

Arts & Culture
12
Columbus Neighborhood Health Center Inc

To serve the central ohio community with affordable, easy to access healthcare services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Historic Columbus Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding the Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CSU FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherCSU FOUNDATIONHISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION INC: $57,200 · OtherHISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION INCHouse of Heroes Chattahoochee: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL INFANTRY MUSEUM: $8,500 · Other+30 more: $104,158 · Other+30 moreUNITED WAY OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOU…RIVERDALE-PORTERDALE CEMETERY: $7,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC WESTVILLE: $6,500 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC LINWOOD FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Arts & CultureCOLUMBUS PHILHARMONIC GUILD INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC: $5,400 · Arts & CultureMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 · InternationalMOBILITY WORLDWIDE: $1,000 · InternationalFeeding the Valley Inc: $15,551 · Food & NutritionTrees Columbus Inc: $7,400 · Community ImprovementMIDTOWN INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT LINUS: $500 · Human Services
Other$254,858Philanthropy$45,000Arts & Culture$30,900International$21,000Food & Nutrition$15,551Community Improvement$12,400Human Services$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION INC: $57,200 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding the Valley Inc: $15,551 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHouse of Heroes Chattahoochee: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $8,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTrees Columbus Inc: $7,400 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetRIVERDALE-PORTERDALE CEMETERY: $7,000 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetHISTORIC WESTVILLE: $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC LINWOOD FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetCOLUMBUS PHILHARMONIC GUILD INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC: $5,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMIDTOWN INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHOUSE OF MERCY INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetGEORGIA-ALABAMA LAND TRUST INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $1,400 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetColumbus Housing Initiative Inc: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGeorgia Historical Society: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILITY WORLDWIDE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT LINUS: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding the Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds House of Heroes Chattahoochee ↗
  • Who funds NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds Trees Columbus Inc ↗
  • Who funds RIVERDALE-PORTERDALE CEMETERY ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC WESTVILLE ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC LINWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS PHILHARMONIC GUILD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds MIDTOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF MERCY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA-ALABAMA LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Columbus Housing Initiative Inc ↗
  • Who funds Georgia Historical Society ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley IncGA46.5× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · Lockwood Partners Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Jackson-Burgin Foundation Inc · Jw & Ethel I Woodruff Foundation Inc · Mildred Miller Fort Foundation Inc · The Jordan Foundation Inc · Bradley-Turner Foundation Inc · Richard and Helen Robbins Family Foundation Inc · The Daniel P Amos Family Foundation · John P and Dorothy S Illges Foundation Inc · The Cliboca Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thornton Jordan Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thornton Jordan Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thornton Jordan Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph