Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas R Leonard Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$35kPhilanthropy$17kEducation$7kAnimals$7kCivil Rights$6kReligion$4kHuman Services$3kMembership Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
8
States reached
$18k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRAXA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$500
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL$300
FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE$300
YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION$250
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$250
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$200
BOY'S TOWN$200
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (ASPCA)$200
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOY'S TOWN: $200 → 12%WINGS AS EAGLES MINISTRIES: $300 → 14%BOY'S TOWN: $200 → 12%WINGS AS EAGLES MINISTRIES: $250 → 14%BOY'S TOWN: $200 → 12%WINGS AS EAGLES MINISTRIES: $250 → 14%BOY'S TOWN: $200 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
SD
OH
CA
NE
VA
DE
AZ
KS
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$75k · 21 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
12

Total granted

$75k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+94%

Still filing today

62%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $700 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FR
    FRAXA Research Foundation Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $16k · revenue +70%
  • TD
    Troops Direct
    3× · 2017–2021 · $11k · revenue +19%
  • FL
    FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $5k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • HM
    HIDEWAY MEMBER SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • TU
    THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +148%
  • CC
    CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
Special Forces Foundation

The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.

Philanthropy
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
National Veterans Foundation Inc

To serve the crisis management, information and referral needs of america's veterans and their families.

—
6
Troops First Foundation Incorporated

To develop, operate, and support a synergistic group of wellness, quality of life, and event-based initiatives in support of today's combat-wounded military personnel and their families, while facilitating a greater recognition and…

Public Benefit
7
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
8
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
9
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
10
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
11
Naval Postgraduate School Foundation Inc

Our mission is to support the naval postgraduate school by providing funding and programmatic support for education, research, technology development, institutional initiatives, and community programs that advance national security and…

Education
12
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is California Highway Patrol. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UC DAVIS MIND INSTITUTE: $10,000 · OtherUC DAVIS MIND INSTITUTESUNFLOWER HILL FOUNDATION: $6,225 · OtherSUNFLOWER HILL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSNIP: $2,700 · OtherSNIPCOMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $2,170 · OtherCOMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHHIDEWAY MEMBER SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $2,000 · OtherCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $2,350 · OtherCHP 11-99 FOUNDATIONCHILDREN OF GRACE: $2,328 · OtherCHILDREN OF GRACE+13 more: $6,565 · Other+13 moreFRAXA Research Foundation Inc: $16,000 · HealthFRAXA Research Foundati…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $750 · Health+2 more: $400 · HealthTroops Direct: $11,150 · PhilanthropyTroops DirectDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyDESERT COMMUNITY…+1 more: $150 · PhilanthropyFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $4,950 · Civil RightsTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $790 · EducationDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $400 · EducationWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,850 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $800 · Human ServicesWINGS AS EAGLES MINISTRIES: $800 · Human ServicesLUKE'S LEGACY FOUNDATION: $3,125 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $200 · Animals
Other$39,338Health$17,150Philanthropy$12,300Civil Rights$4,950Education$3,690Human Services$3,450Animals$3,325

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRAXA Research Foundation Inc: $16,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTroops Direct: $11,150 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $4,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLUKE'S LEGACY FOUNDATION: $3,125 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $2,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN OF GRACE: $2,328 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,850 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS AS EAGLES MINISTRIES: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $790 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPET RESCUE CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNRAVEL: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLETOWN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRAXA Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Troops Direct ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds LUKE'S LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF GRACE ↗
  • Who funds THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds WINGS AS EAGLES MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PET RESCUE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNRAVEL ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLETOWN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas R Leonard Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas R Leonard Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thomas R Leonard’s filings →

More from the funding graph