How much does Thomas J Reinhart Foundation John F Emanuel Co-Trustee give?

Thomas J Reinhart Foundation John F Emanuel Co-Trustee reported 13 grants totaling $71,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 16 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.

Who are Thomas J Reinhart Foundation John F Emanuel Co-Trustee's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Austin Area School for Dyslexics Inc ($165k), Comparative Constitutions Project ($104k), Second Harvest Heartland ($21k).

Does Thomas J Reinhart Foundation John F Emanuel Co-Trustee fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 18% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Thomas J Reinhart Foundation John F Emanuel Co-Trustee accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as Thomas J Reinhart Foundation John F Emanuel Co-Trustee?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Austin Community Foundation Inc, Shield-Ayres Foundation, Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc.

Thomas J Reinhart Foundation John F Emanuel Co-Trustee

Thomas J Reinhart Foundation John F Emanuel Co-Trustee at a glance

· Private foundation

Thomas J Reinhart Foundation John F Emanuel Co-Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$71k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$25k

Largest

01What it funds

0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$205kSocial Science$104kHealth$53kRecreation & Sports$38kFood & Nutrition$25kEnvironment$16kInternational$11kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0

02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k10 grants · $26k
$10k–50k3 grants · $45k

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.4M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
Rawson Saunders School	$25,000
SUSAN G KOMEN	$10,000
BLAIR ACADEMY	$10,000
Travis County Parks Foundation	$5,000
Austin Outside	$5,000
Planned Parenthood Federation	$4,000
ACLU FOUNDATION	$2,000
Compassion Choices	$2,000
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION	$2,000
Malaika Early Learning Center	$2,000
Second Harvest Heartland	$2,000
Oxfam America	$1,000
WAY TO GROW	$1,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$441k · 19 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$441k

$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%

+4%

Still filing today

74%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionHealthInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AA
AUSTIN AREA SCHOOL FOR DYSLEXICS INC
7× · 2019–2025 · $165k · revenue +29%
SH
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
8× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +96%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
7× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +12%

Funded once

SS
ST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
one grant, 2017 · $9k
BV
BEYOND VISION INC
one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue -9%
IG
Individual grant recipient
one grant, 2017 · $3k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment

Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—

Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment

Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education

Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment

Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition

Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals

Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment

Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International

Texas 2036

Texas 2036 identifies and advances data-driven policies that will improve lives and expand opportunities for all Texans.

Public Benefit

American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech

One Earth Philanthropy

One Earth's mission is to empower everyone, everywhere, with the knowledge, inspiration, and opportunity to heal the Earth and reclaim our future.

Environment

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Habitable. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/21

Grantees still filing

12/21

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Education$193,500Other$203,250Health$29,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Public Benefit$15,000International$11,000Environment$9,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Shield-Ayres Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas J Reinhart Foundation John F Emanuel Co-Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas J Reinhart Foundation John F Emanuel Co-Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Thomas J Reinhart Foundation John F Emanuel Co-Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home