Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas J Bliffert Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$102k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$192kInternational$42kHealth$21kHousing & Shelter$20kEnvironment$12kReligion$11kFood & Nutrition$6kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $61k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$668k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Blue Lotus Farm and Retreat Center$40,000
Pradiya Foundation$21,000
St Vincent de Paul Society$9,600
Street Angels Inc$6,000
Community Projects for Seniors$3,500
Grand Avenue Club$3,500
Self-Realization Fellowship$3,000
California Wildfire Relief Fund$2,120
Christine Center$2,000
Clean Wisconsin$2,000
River Alliance of WI$2,000
The Shorewood Foundation$1,500
Eisenhower Center$1,000
Awake Milwaukee Ltd$1,000
Penfield Childrens Center$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%United Community Center: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$295k · 15 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$295k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+14%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $137k · revenue +56%
  • STREET ANGELS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +55%
  • AL
    AWAKE LTD
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • AC
    ALMA CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +64%
  • CO
    CITY OF LAKES WALDORF SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -7%
  • FF
    Frieden's Food Pantry
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
2
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
3
One Wisconsin Now Inc

To advance progressive values, ideas and policies through research, policy, networking, advocacy and public education.

—
4
Northwoods Inc of Wisconsin

Service for disabled adults

Human Services
5
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
6
West Central Initiative

Serving to improve west central minnesota through funding, programs, and technical assistance. vision of a vibrant, inclusive, and sustainable world starts here in west central minnesota.

Philanthropy
7
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
8
Landmark Conservancy Inc

Landmark conservancy is a nationally accredited, nonprofit conservation organization serving 20 counties across northwest wisconsin. their mission is to conserve wisconsin's natural legacy for everyone...forever.

Environment
9
West Bend Community Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
10
Pinewood Duluth Inc

Pinewood - duluth, inc. is a day support services agency providing pre-vocational and vocational services for persons having intellectual and developmental disabilities who are eighteen (18) years of age and older. persons attending…

—
11
Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.

Human Services
12
Groundwork Milwaukee Inc

Bring about the sustained regeneration, improvement, and management of the physical environment by developing community-based partnerships that empower people, businesses, and organizations to promote environmental, economic, and social…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blue Lotus Farm & Retreat Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pradiya Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER INC: $136,500 · PhilanthropyBLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER INCSt Vincent de Paul Society: $38,400 · OtherSt Vincent de Paul SocietyCommunity Projects for Seniors: $10,500 · OtherCommunity Projects for SeniorsGRAND AVENUE CLUB INC: $9,500 · OtherGRAND AVENUE CLUB INCSELF-REALIZATION FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $8,000 · OtherSELF-REALIZATION FELLOWSHIP CHURCHRiver Alliance of WI: $7,000 · OtherRiver Alliance of WIALMA CENTER INC: $5,000 · Other+12 more: $22,120 · Other+12 morePRADIYA FOUNDATION: $42,100 · InternationalPRADIYA FOUNDA…STREET ANGELS INC: $19,575 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $4,000 · HealthEISENHOWER CENTER INC: $4,000 · HealthVERSITI INC: $3,000 · HealthCITY OF LAKES WALDORF SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationAWAKE LTD: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$136,500Other$100,520International$42,100Human Services$20,675Health$11,000Education$5,000Crime & Legal$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER INC: $136,500 over 4y, 10% of budgetPRADIYA FOUNDATION: $42,100 over 3y, 17% of budgetSTREET ANGELS INC: $19,575 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetGRAND AVENUE CLUB INC: $9,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCITY OF LAKES WALDORF SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAWAKE LTD: $5,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEISENHOWER CENTER INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHOREWOOD FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetVERSITI INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHRISTINE CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNourishMKE Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PRADIYA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STREET ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND AVENUE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ALMA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF LAKES WALDORF SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AWAKE LTD ↗
  • Who funds PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EISENHOWER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHOREWOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VERSITI INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRISTINE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NourishMKE Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Rite-Hite Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas J Bliffert Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas J Bliffert Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Thomas J Bliffert Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Thomas J Bliffert Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thomas J Bliffert’s filings →

More from the funding graph