Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thomas I & Peggy a Baldwin Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
0163% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Education$66kHealth$43kEmployment$33kInternational$23kCivil Rights$10kHuman Services$5kOther$108k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KALEIDOSCOPE CHILD FOUNDATION INC$13,213
WELLNESS HOUSE OF ANNAPOLIS$10,008
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$9,971
FOLDS OF HONOR$5,000
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CASA INC$5,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$5,000
LEADERSHIP ANNE ARUNDEL INC$2,500
ACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF ANNAPOLIS$1,000
HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE$100
ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Thomas I & Peggy a Baldwin Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in MD; read by stated purpose it is 79% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Thomas I & Peggy a Baldwin Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$119k · 7 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$119k
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+39%

Still filing today

71%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthInternationalEmploymentHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KALEIDOSCOPE CHILD FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2024 · $28k · revenue +166%
  • WE
    WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +84%
  • AW
    ANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION
    3× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • AS
    ARCHBISHOP SPALDING HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • PO
    PROVIDENCE OF MARYLAND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $33k · revenue +132%
  • LH
    LUMINIS HEALTH ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Anne's School of Annapolis Inc

St. annes school of annapolis invests in the intellectual and spiritual promise of each student in a community that celebrates diversity and values the dignity of every human being. we challenge students to think critically and creatively,…

Unclassified
2
Ann Arbor Academy Inc

To provide a program for middle and high school students with learning disabilities that works with each student to achieve the highest academic success.

Education
3
Annapolis Christian Academy

Private school for grades k-12

Education
4
Kids Chance of Maryland Inc

Provide financial scholarships to children who have had a parent or guardian who has suffered a catastrophic or fatal accidental injury or occupational disease while working for a maryland employer

Philanthropy
5
St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families

St. Anns Center helps mothers and children overcome crisis and achieve lasting independence and stability by providing a safe and supportive home, child care, education and employment assistance, and clinical social work services within a…

Human Services
6
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
7
Learn Dc Public Charter School

Provide students with the academic foundation and ambition to earn a college degree.

Education
8
The Christian Academy

The christian academy provides christian education to 300 students from kindergarten to 12th grade. the christian academy is a college-preparatory school.

9
Achievement House Charter School

It is the mission of the achievement house cyber charter school to provide all students with an experience that is complete with improved personal outcome and academic success and achievement in a rich and personalized learning environment…

Education
10
Mentoring Mentors Inc

Mentoring Mentors is a Baltimore-based non-profit dedicated to developing future community leaders through exposure that leads to college and career readiness.

Youth Development
11
Junior Achievement of Greater Washington

To educate and inspire young people to succeed in a global economy.

International
12
The Mclean School of Maryland Inc

Mclean school's small classes and abilities model prepare bright students in kindergarten through twelfth grade, including those with dyslexia, anxiety, and attention issues, for college success.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ace Mentor Program of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kaleidoscope Child Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr16%5%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr11%20%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr16%2%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr11%30%35–55yr16%26%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/20
the rest of the field
14%
5,903/41,829

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ARCHBISHOP SPALDING HIGH SCHOOL — $50,000 · OtherARCHBISHOP SPALDING HIGH SCHOOLJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT — $25,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENTCHESTERTON ACADEMY — $10,000 · OtherCHESTERTON ACADEMYCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $9,971 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESFOCUS MISSION FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · Other+3 more — $2,700 · OtherKALEIDOSCOPE CHILD FOUNDATION — $28,213 · EducationKALEIDOSCOPE CHILD FOUNDAT…WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC — $20,000 · EducationWOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE …FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $6,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATIONFOLDS OF HONOR EASTERN-PA-NJ-CHAPTER — $5,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR EASTERN-PA-…Divine Mercy Academy — $5,000 · EducationDivine Mercy Academy+2 more — $2,000 · EducationLUMINIS HEALTH ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · HealthLUMINIS HEALTH A…ANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION — $17,508 · HealthANNAPOLIS WELLNE…PROVIDENCE OF MARYLAND INC — $32,500 · EmploymentPROVIDENCE O…SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC — $15,642 · InternationalSISTER OF…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC — $7,800 · InternationalJUNIOR AC…ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CASA INC — $10,000 · Civil RightsASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $5,000 · Human Services
Other$107,671Education$66,213Health$42,508Employment$32,500International$23,442Civil Rights$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPROVIDENCE OF MARYLAND INC — $32,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKALEIDOSCOPE CHILD FOUNDATION — $28,213 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetLUMINIS HEALTH ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION — $17,508 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CASA INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC — $7,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR EASTERN-PA-NJ-CHAPTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDivine Mercy Academy — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP ANNE ARUNDEL INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF AMERICA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACE MENTOR PROGRAM ANNAPOLIS — $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving IncMD19.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · American Gift Fund · The Geaton and Joann Decesaris Family Foundation Inc · Arundel Community Development Services Inc · Edward St John Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Anne Arundel Co · Allegis Group Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thomas I & Peggy a Baldwin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Thomas I & Peggy a Baldwin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Thomas I & Peggy a Baldwin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph