Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thomas E Rodgers Jr Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$227k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$670kAnimals$175kInternational$165kHuman Services$160kEducation$105kRecreation & Sports$105kArts & Culture$59kYouth Development$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $107k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$77k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mount Sinai Medical Center Foundati$50,000
Miami Country Day School$25,000
Optimist International Foundation$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Animal Welfare Society$10,000
Hole In The Wall Gang$10,000
Bay Oaks Historic Retirement Reside$7,500
Miami Childrens Museum$7,500
University of Miami$5,000
Paws for Purple Hearts$5,000
A Way for a Stray$5,000
Salvation Army$5,000
Semester at Sea$5,000
Women of Tomorrow$5,000
Wounded Warrior Project$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Paws 4 Liberty: $5k → 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $5k → 14%Paws 4 Liberty: $5k → 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $5k → 14%Paws 4 Liberty: $5k → 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $5k → 14%Paws 4 Liberty: $5k → 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $5k → 14%Paws 4 Liberty: $5k → 11%Paws 4 Liberty: $5k → 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $5k → 17%Paws 4 Liberty: $5k → 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 34 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
7

Total granted

$1.6M
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+144%

Still filing today

59%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyPublic BenefitInternationalHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $300k · revenue +60%
  • OI
    OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $115k · revenue +27%
  • HI
    HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $105k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • TK
    The Kennedy Center
    one grant, 2023 · $24k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Marine Corps Scholarship Foundation Inc

See schedule othe marine corps scholarship foundation is the nation's oldest and largest provider of need-based scholarships to military children. founded in 1962, the marine corps scholarship foundation provides access to education for…

Education
4
University of Miami
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc

Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…

Education
8
Morehouse School of Medicine

Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…

Education
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida Inc

To provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching, research, charity care and financial responsibility.

Health
11
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
12
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersIndependent K-8 SchoolsCommunity Arts OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionHomeless Services & ShelterEducation Equity LeadershipFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Developmental Disabilities …Christian Missionary Organi…Veteran Support ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsChristian Youth Camps
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%4%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr15%24%20–35yr9%32%35–55yr12%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%6%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr15%14%20–35yr9%52%35–55yr12%18%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,018

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Mount Sinai — $250,000 · OtherMount SinaiANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC — $65,000 · OtherANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INCIndividual grant recipient — $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSalvation Army — $55,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyBAY OAKS HISTORIC RETIREMENT RESIDENCE INC — $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherA WAY FOR A STRAY INC — $30,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INC — $30,000 · OtherMake A Wish — $30,000 · OtherWOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR AND SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM INC — $40,000 · OtherMIAMI CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC FKA MIAMI YOUTH MUSEUM — $30,000 · Other+16 more — $204,556 · Other+16 moreMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $300,000 · HealthMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CEN…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $30,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR …THE V FOUNDATION — $15,000 · HealthINSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION — $50,000 · EducationINSTITUTE…University of Miami — $30,000 · EducationUniversit…THE VICTORY CENTER INC — $30,000 · EducationTHE VICTO…MIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $25,000 · EducationMIAMI COU…OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $115,000 · PhilanthropyLYFORD CAY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $2,500 · PhilanthropyHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $105,000 · Recreation & SportsPAWS 4 LIBERTY INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $30,000 · InternationalMercy Ships International — $20,000 · International
Other$874,556Health$345,000Education$135,000Philanthropy$122,500Recreation & Sports$105,000Human Services$65,000International$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $115,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $105,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION — $50,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBAY OAKS HISTORIC RETIREMENT RESIDENCE INC — $45,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetWOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR AND SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM INC — $40,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetPAWS 4 LIBERTY INC — $35,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VICTORY CENTER INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMIAMI CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC FKA MIAMI YOUTH MUSEUM — $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOIC OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMercy Ships International — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMiami Rescue Mission Inc — $17,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYFORD CAY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBATTIER TAKE CHARGE FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION
  • Who funds BAY OAKS HISTORIC RETIREMENT RESIDENCE INC
  • Who funds WOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR AND SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds PAWS 4 LIBERTY INC
  • Who funds University of Miami
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds THE VICTORY CENTER INC
  • Who funds MIAMI CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC FKA MIAMI YOUTH MUSEUM
  • Who funds MIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS
  • Who funds OIC OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International
  • Who funds Miami Rescue Mission Inc
  • Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds LYFORD CAY FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Garner FoundationFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Garner Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The Miami Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thomas E Rodgers Jr Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Oic of South Florida Inc89% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • Miami Children's Museum Inc Fka Miami Youth Museum0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Thomas E Rodgers Jr Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Thomas E Rodgers Jr Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph