Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas D Buckley Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$555k
Granted FY2024still arriving
69
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$403kPublic Benefit$389kReligion$201kPublic Safety & Disaster$104kHealth$60kFood & Nutrition$41kArts & Culture$40kPhilanthropy$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 69 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 69 grants below total $427,244, the rows itemized in this filing. The $555,494 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $128,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k56 grants · $155k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $222k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
City of Chappell, Nebraska$50,000
Chappell Fire District #1$30,000
Creek Valley School Education Foundtn$26,000
Creek Valley Public Schools$25,000
Way Out West Community Theatre$20,000
Buckley Continuing Ed Scholarship Acct.$20,000
City of Chappell, Nebraska$20,000
Buckley High School Scholarship Acct.$19,000
Sedgwick County Memorial Hospital$15,000
Nebraska Lutheran Outdoor Ministries$14,350
Regional West Garden County$12,500
Chappell Methodist Church$10,000
University of Nebraska Foundation$10,000
City of Chappell, Nebraska$8,750
Oshkosh United Methodist Church$8,450
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$992k · 29 repeat orgs$315k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
24

Total granted

$992k
$207k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-9%

Still filing today

14%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’24
HealthEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NL
    NEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES
    3× · 2020–2024 · $46k · revenue +26%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2024 · $20k · revenue +31%
  • SC
    SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION
    2× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • LR
    Lodgepole Rural Fire District #3
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • CV
    Creek Valley Public School Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $24k
  • CV
    Creek Valley School Educational Fndtn
    one grant, 2020 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
2
Jefferson Community Health Center Inc

Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.

Health
3
Labette County Medical Center

We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.

Health
4
North Platte Nebraska Hospital Corp

To inspire health and healing by putting patients first -- always.

Health
5
Nebraska Methodist Hospital

Nebraska methodist hospital (commonly know as "methodist hospital") is an acute care facility dedicated to bringing high quality care for the mind, body and spirit of every person. we provide community-based health care, health education…

Health
6
Pella Regional Health Center

The mission of pella regional health center is to provide healthcare and healing services with christian compassion.

Health
7
Northland Health Partners Community Health Center

Northland community health center is committed to providing access to affordable and quality health services.

Health
8
Vna Hospice of Southwest Iowa

Cherishing life's journey through an extraordinary commitment to compassion, comfort and holistic care.

—
9
Heartland Community Health Network Inc

Heartland community health network exists to support and strengthen its federally qualified health center members through collaboration, information-sharing and integration of administrative, fiscal and clinical operations.

Health
10
The Nebraska Land Trust Inc

To foster the protection of agricultural, historical and natural resources on land in nebraska through education, partnering and permanent conservation.

Environment
11
Skagit Hospice Foundation

To fund the program and services of hospice of the nothwest to ensure dignified and compassionate care is available to anyone coping with a life-limiting diagnosis.one size doesn't always fit all, especially when it comes to quality of…

Health
12
Sauk Prairie Healthcare Inc

Extraordinary healthcare from the heart - one person at a time.vision: we will set the standard for community-based healthcare that improves the health and quality of life of the people we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nebraska Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Kid's Plus Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

City of Chappell, Nebraska: $368,104 · OtherCity of Chappell, NebraskaCreek Valley Public Schools: $150,225 · OtherCreek Valley Public SchoolsBuckley Continuing Ed Scholarship Acct.: $60,000 · OtherBuckley High School Scholarship Acct.: $59,000 · OtherCHAPPELL SENIOR CENTER: $48,500 · OtherNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES: $45,550 · Other+55 more: $512,803 · Other+55 moreREGIONAL WEST GARDEN COUNTY: $12,500 · HealthREGIONAL WEST MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 · HealthKIMBALL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthSANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION: $9,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationSOUTH PLATTE EARLY LEARNING PROGRAMS: $1,000 · EducationOREGON TRAIL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyKEARNEY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · PhilanthropyNEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropySIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $250 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,244,182Health$41,500Education$21,000Philanthropy$18,000Housing & Shelter$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHAPPELL SENIOR CENTER: $48,500 over 3y, 65% of budgetNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES: $45,550 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL WEST GARDEN COUNTY: $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOREGON TRAIL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetREGIONAL WEST MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIMBALL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKID'S PLUS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION: $9,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetKEARNEY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH PLATTE EARLY LEARNING PROGRAMS: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHAPPELL SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL WEST GARDEN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OREGON TRAIL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL WEST MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KIMBALL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KID'S PLUS INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Virginia Smith Charitable TrustNE17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Virginia Smith Charitable Trust · Nebraska Community Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Thomas D Buckley Trust?

Find your warmest path to Thomas D Buckley Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $563k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thomas D Buckley’s filings →

More from the funding graph