Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Nebraska · Nonprofit

SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION

SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION (Nebraska) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $75,659 to it, the largest being NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($38,391). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$603k
Revenue FY2025
5
Funders on record
$76k
Grants received
$54k
Net assets
3/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 3%

Against its field

SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION has grown faster than half of the 6,881 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin1% · below the median
Months of reserve1.8mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,881 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($305k) Expenses 100 ($270k) Net assets 100 ($106k)2018 Revenue 111 ($337k) Expenses 125 ($337k) Net assets 100 ($107k)2019 Revenue 138 ($421k) Expenses 150 ($405k) Net assets 77 ($82k)2020 Revenue 143 ($434k) Expenses 170 ($459k) Net assets 54 ($57k)2021 Revenue 149 ($453k) Expenses 171 ($463k) Net assets 44 ($47k)2022 Revenue 170 ($519k) Expenses 187 ($505k) Net assets 58 ($61k)2023 Revenue 174 ($530k) Expenses 201 ($544k) Net assets 45 ($47k)2024 Revenue 178 ($542k) Expenses 201 ($544k) Net assets 44 ($47k)2025 Revenue 198 ($603k) Expenses 221 ($597k) Net assets 51 ($54k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (198)Expenses (221)Net assets (51)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 86% · 2018 95% · 2019 89% · 2020 90% · 2021 93% · 2022 89% · 2023 84% · 2024 91% · 2025 55%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

97% of SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (83% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 14,844 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$34k
17
$374
18
$17k
19
$25k
20
$10k
21
$14k
22
$14k
23
$1k
24
$6k
25
1.8
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income fell $14k → $13k.

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)51% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 51% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

51% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION.

51%
largest funder
94%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 71% · 2020 1% · 2021 100% · 2022 99% · 2023 99%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

51% of SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $37k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Nebraska funders.

NE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
22
Nebraska out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $39k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $500k on record.

Federal$500k
grants $500kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Justice$500k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Nebraska

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

96% of spending goes to programs.

Program 96%Management 3%Fundraising 2%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NE

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION?
SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION (Nebraska) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $75,659 to it, the largest being NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($38,391). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $75,659 in grants to SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION?
NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $38,391 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SANDHILLS CRISIS INTERVENTION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nebraska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing