Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas and Donna Whitney Education Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$166kEducation$136kArts & Culture$48kEnvironment$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kPhilanthropy$2kFood & Nutrition$2k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $37k
$37,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$959k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EL CAMINO HEALTH FOUNDATION$37,000
RESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHERS (RAFT)$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 7% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MUSIC FOR MINORS: $6k → 7%EDENVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $1k → 8%SAVE OUR SHORES: $1k → 13%MARK AND CAROLYN GUIDRY FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%MUSIC FOR MINORS: $5k → 7%EDENVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $1k → 8%LOMA PRIETA EDUCATION FUND: $1k → 13%MUSIC FOR MINORS: $3k → 7%EL CAMINO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $70k → 8%LOMA PRIETA EDUCATION FUND: $1k → 13%MUSIC FOR MINORS: $3k → 7%EL CAMINO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $5k → 13%MUSIC FOR MINORS: $3k → 7%EL CAMINO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $5k → 13%MUSIC FOR MINORS: $3k → 7%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM: $2k → 8%LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $5k → 13%EL CAMINO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $5k → 13%MONTALVO ARTS CENTER: $3k → 8%LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $3k → 13%EL CAMINO HEALTH FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%EL CAMINO HEALTH FOUNDATION: $37k → 8%COMMUNITY HEALTH AWARENESS COUNCIL (CHAC): $10k → 8%COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOR MUSIC AND ARTS (CSMA): $3k → 8%THE TRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA: $5k → 8%FOOTHILL-DE ANZA FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%THE TRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA: $2k → 8%THE TRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA: $1k → 8%RESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHERS (RAFT): $40k → 8%RESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHERS (RAFT): $10k → 8%RESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHERS (RAFT): $5k → 8%NEW MUSEUM LOS GATOS (FORMERLY LOS GATOS MUSEUMS ASSOCIATION): $5k → 8%RESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHERS (RAFT): $5k → 8%NEW MUSEUM LOS GATOS: $5k → 8%RESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHERS (RAFT): $3k → 8%NEW MUSEUM LOS GATOS: $5k → 8%RESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHERS (RAFT): $3k → 8%NEW MUSEUM LOS GATOS (FORMERLY LOS GATOS MUSEUMS ASSOCIATION): $4k → 8%RESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHERS (RAFT): $3k → 8%NEW MUSEUM LOS GATOS (FORMERLY LOS GATOS MUSEUMS ASSOCIATION): $1k → 8%RESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHERS (RAFT): $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Thomas and Donna Whitney Education Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 94%.

Thomas and Donna Whitney Education Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$370k · 11 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +224% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$370k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+224%
+12%

Still filing today

36%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LT
    LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
    5× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue ×12
  • MF
    MUSIC FOR MINORS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $21k · revenue +59%
  • MT
    MENTOR TUTOR CONNECTION
    4× · 2018–2022 · $10k · revenue +224%

Funded once

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH AWARENESS COUNCIL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • FC
    FOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +10%
  • MA
    MONTALVO ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Monterey Museum of Art

The monterey museum of art cultivates curiosity in the visual arts and engages community with the diversity of california art - past, present, and future.

Arts & Culture
2
San Diego Habitat Conservancy

Acquire, manage and protect land in perpetuity that supports sensitive habitats and species, and to educate and inspire people and communities as stewards and advocates of their natural environment.

Arts & Culture
3
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
4
Montecito Community Foundation

The purpose of the Montecito Community Foundation is to support a strong Montecito community and serve as a resource for philanthropy.

Philanthropy
5
Ag Land Trust

It is the purpose of Ag Land Trust to assist in the preservation and protection of all productive and important agricultural, open space and historical lands in Monterey County (and adjacent areas). Such action will contribute derectly to…

Environment
6
Monterey Bay Economic Partnership Inc

To improve the economic health and quality of life in the monterey bay region.

Community Improvement
7
Monterey County Film Commission

To inspire and facilitate film and media production throughout monterey county, creating positive economic impact.

Arts & Culture
8
California Farmland Trust

The mission of the California Farmland Trust is to help farmers protect the best farmland in the world.

Environment
9
Shasta Land Trust

Conserve the beauty, character, and diversity of significant lands in far northern california. currently shasta land trust holds conservation easements that permanently protect about 66,000 acres of land.

Environment
10
Mearth

To educate and inspire through environmental stewardship.

Youth Development
11
Montezuma Land Conservancy

Changing lives through land conservation by connecting people to place, forever.

Environment
12
Monterra Community Fund

Monterra community fund is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit fund created by monterra credit union to support our commitment to financial wellness in our community.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trust for Hidden Villa; the most unlike its peers is Mark and Carolyn Guidry Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EL CAMINO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $129,000 · OtherEL CAMINO HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONEL CAMINO HEALTH FOUNDATION: $87,000 · OtherEL CAMINO HEALTH FOUNDATIONRESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHERS (RAFT): $68,500 · OtherRESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHERS (RAFT)+8 more: $39,500 · Other+8 moreLAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $22,500 · EnvironmentTRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA: $8,000 · EnvironmentMUSIC FOR MINORS INC: $21,000 · Arts & CultureMONTALVO ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · Arts & CultureMENTOR TUTOR CONNECTION: $10,000 · EducationFOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM: $2,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$324,000Environment$30,500Arts & Culture$23,500Education$10,000Philanthropy$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $22,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMUSIC FOR MINORS INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMENTOR TUTOR CONNECTION: $10,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetTRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA: $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTALVO ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARK AND CAROLYN GUIDRY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE OUR SHORES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC FOR MINORS INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTOR TUTOR CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds TRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTALVO ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MARK AND CAROLYN GUIDRY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds SAVE OUR SHORES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA18.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The Applied Materials Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas and Donna Whitney Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas and Donna Whitney Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas and Donna Whitney Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph