Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas and Diane Barrett Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$192kArts & Culture$45kEnvironment$23kHealth$12kHousing & Shelter$3kEducation$2kFood & Nutrition$1kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINT JOHN EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL$19,635
DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS$5,000
COLORADO PUBLIC RADIO$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF COLORADO$2,000
SAINT FRANCIS CENTER$1,200
COMMUNITY COLLEGE DENVER FOUNDATION$1,000
HIGHLINE CANAL CONSERVATORY$1,000
OPERA COLORADO$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
CHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST$250
DENVER ART MUSEUM$250
HISTORY COLORADO$80
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WASHINGTON NATIONAL CATHEDRAL: $500 → 14%CE 12 FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%CHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST: $250 → 14%JIMINY WICKET: $1k → 8%ROCKY MOUNTAIN MARINES: $500 → 12%US MARINE CORPS MEMORIAL: $1k → 7%OPERA COLORADO: $1k → 8%ROCKY MOUNTAIN MARINES: $500 → 12%OPERA COLORADO: $600 → 8%ROCKY MOUNTAIN MARINES USMC: $500 → 12%OPERA COLORADO: $600 → 8%ROCKY MOUNTAIN MARINES: $500 → 12%COLORADO PUBLIC RADIO: $2k → 8%ST FRANCIS CENTER: $2k → 12%COLORADO PUBLIC RADIO: $2k → 8%SAINT FRANCIS CENTER: $1k → 12%COLORADO PUBLIC RADIO: $2k → 8%DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE: $500 → 12%COLORADO PUBLIC RADIO: $2k → 8%WOMENS FOUNDATION: $500 → 12%HIGHLINE CANAL CONSERVATORY: $1k → 8%DENVER CROQUET CLUB: $500 → 12%DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS: $6k → 12%DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS: $5k → 12%DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS: $4k → 12%DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS: $4k → 12%DENVER BOTANIC GARDEN: $4k → 12%LIV LYME FOUNDATION: $500 → 12%ST JOHNS CATHEDRAL: $70k → 12%SAINT JOHNS EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $70k → 12%SAINT JOHN EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $20k → 12%ST JOHNS CATHEDRAL: $18k → 12%ST JOHNS CATHEDRAL: $14k → 12%SAINT FRANCIS CENTER: $300 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $265 → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF COLORADO: $3k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF COLORADO: $2k → 12%ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $2k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF COLORADO: $2k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD ROCKY MOUNTAIN: $2k → 12%ONE DENVER: $500 → 12%METRO CARING: $1k → 12%DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING AR: $10k → 12%DENVER CNTR FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $10k → 12%DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING AR: $10k → 12%COMMUNITY COLLEGE DENVER FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $615 → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $295 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$178k · 10 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
16

Total granted

$178k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+4%

Still filing today

60%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +203%
  • DB
    DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +14%
  • PB
    PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • SJ
    SAINT JOHNS EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL
    one grant, 2024 · $70k
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +9%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD ROCKY MOUNTAIN
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
2
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
3
Denver Metro Convention & Visitors Bureau

To bring conventions and leisure visitors to denver for the economic benefit of the city, the community, and our partners.

—
4
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
5
Colorado Bar Association

To advance the science of jurisprudence, secure the more efficient administration of justice, encourage the adoption of proper legislation, advocate thorough and continuing legal education, uphold the honor and integrity of the bar,…

—
6
The Denver Foundation

To inspire people and mobilize resources to strengthen our community.

Philanthropy
7
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
8
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
9
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
10
Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce

The denver metro chamber of commerce is the architect of tomorrow, igniting change and driving progress to build dynamic economies and communities. we champion innovation, forge powerful partnerships, and relentlessly advocate for our…

—
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
Community Radio for Northern Colorado

Community radio for northern colorado's (crnc) mission is to strengthen our community by cultivating the mind and spirit - informing, inspiring, and entertaining. crnc strives to meet its mission by operating two public media services -…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Center for the Performing Arts; the most unlike its peers is CE12 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT JOHN'S CATHEDRAL IN THE WILDERNESS: $102,116 · OtherSAINT JOHN'S CATHEDRAL IN THE WILDERNESSSAINT JOHNS EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $70,020 · OtherSAINT JOHNS EPISCOPAL CATHEDRALSAINT JOHN EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $19,635 · OtherSAINT JOHN EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL+16 more: $21,645 · Other+16 moreDENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $30,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER CENTER FO…PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $8,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADCAST…OPERA COLORADO: $2,200 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $1,660 · Arts & CultureDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $22,950 · EnvironmentDENVER BO…ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $2,000 · HealthLIVLYME FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthCE12 FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Community ImprovementUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $265 · EducationCHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC: $250 · Education
Other$213,416Arts & Culture$41,860Environment$22,950Health$2,500Community Improvement$1,000Education$515

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $22,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ST FRANCIS CENTER: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERA COLORADO: $2,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $1,160 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO CARING: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCE12 FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetColorado Museum of Natural History: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVLYME FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $265 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ST FRANCIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OPERA COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds METRO CARING ↗
  • Who funds CE12 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds LIVLYME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas and Diane Barrett Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas and Diane Barrett Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thomas and Diane Barrett Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Thomas and Diane Barrett Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas and Diane Barrett’s filings →

    More from the funding graph