Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas and Denise Blizil Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2022
16
Grants FY2022
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$54kHealth$29kPhilanthropy$8kRecreation & Sports$8kHuman Services$5kFood & Nutrition$1kCivil Rights$1kReligion$300Other$0
02FY2022 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST TIMOTHY CATHOLIC SCHOOL$9,575
CRESCENT COVE$1,985
MAPLE LAKE LIBRARY$1,090
AMERICAN INSTIT FOR CANCER RES$1,000
THE ACTION CENTER$1,000
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$150
BUFFALO COMMUNITY ORCHESTRA$100
Individual grant recipient$100
SUPERSTITION COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$100
BUFFALO HERD BAND AIDES$100
CATHOLIC SERVICES APPEAL FOUNDATION$100
WRAPPED IN LOVE$100
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$100
MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTER$75
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $1k → 12%CRESCENT COVE: $2k → 11%YOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION: $100 → 11%WRIGHT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION: $1k → 5%ACTION FOR CHILDREN ZAMBIA: $50 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
OH
CA
CO
MO
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$101k · 12 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
19

Total granted

$101k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+1%

Still filing today

25%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    ST TIMOTHY CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    6× · 2017–2022 · $42k
  • BH
    BUFFALO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $20k
  • ML
    MAPLE LAKE LIBRARY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $12k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • AF
    ANNANDALE FOOD SHELFgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +39%
  • WC
    WRIGHT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cornerhouse

The mission of cornerhouse is to partner with families, communities, and systems - entrusted with the safety of children, youth and vulnerable adults - to reduce trauma and end abuse.

Crime & Legal
2
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
3
Tru Community Care

We are leading a healthcare transformation by engaging with our communities and offering innovative, meangingful care for those living with illness and loss.

Human Services
4
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
5
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
6
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
7
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
8
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
9
Ascentria Care Alliance Inc

We are called to strengthen communities by empowering people to respond to life's challenges.

Human Services
10
Anne Arundel County Casa Inc

Advocate for and support abused and neglected children to ensure their right to safe, stable and permanent homes.

Civil Rights
11
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
12
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jeffco Action Center Inc the Action Center; the most unlike its peers is The Rourke Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST TIMOTHY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $41,799 · OtherST TIMOTHY CATHOLIC SCHOOLBUFFALO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $19,600 · OtherBUFFALO HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONMAPLE LAKE LIBRARY: $12,050 · OtherMAPLE LAKE LIBRARYUSSA FUND: $7,500 · OtherUSSA FUNDAMERICAN INSTIT FOR CANCER RES: $6,000 · OtherAMERICAN INSTIT FOR CANCER RES+23 more: $6,870 · Other+23 moreTRUE FRIENDS: $7,500 · Recreation & SportsCRESCENT COVE: $1,985 · Human ServicesWRIGHT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCOLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $1,000 · Human Services+2 more: $150 · Human ServicesSECOND WIND FUND INC: $3,000 · EducationCENTRAL MINNESOTA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $100 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $75 · HealthBUFFALO COMMUNITY ORCHESTRA INC: $100 · Arts & CultureCASSIA: $100 · ReligionCROSSROADS ANIMAL SHELTER: $50 · Animals
Other$93,819Recreation & Sports$7,500Human Services$4,135Education$3,000Health$175Arts & Culture$100Religion$100Animals$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUE FRIENDS: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND WIND FUND INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRESCENT COVE: $1,985 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANNANDALE FOOD SHELF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWRIGHT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rourke Family Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUFFALO COMMUNITY ORCHESTRA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL MINNESOTA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASSIA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS ANIMAL SHELTER: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION FOR CHILDREN ZAMBIA: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUE FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds SECOND WIND FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CRESCENT COVE ↗
  • Who funds ANNANDALE FOOD SHELF ↗
  • Who funds WRIGHT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds The Rourke Family Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BUFFALO COMMUNITY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL MINNESOTA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CASSIA ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds ACTION FOR CHILDREN ZAMBIA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL13.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas and Denise Blizil Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas and Denise Blizil Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas and Denise Blizil Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph