Skip to content
Theresa Harris Moore & Joe B Moore Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Theresa Harris Moore & Joe B Moore Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$222kReligion$198kHuman Services$185kCrime & Legal$106kFood & Nutrition$105kEducation$91kRecreation & Sports$18kHousing & Shelter$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$533k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INVADE TRANSITIONAL HOME$15,000
SPRINGDALE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$12,500
NEW BEGINNINGS NWA$10,000
CASA OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS INC$10,000
METHODIST FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION$7,500
WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT$5,000
SHEEP DOG IMPACT ASSIST$5,000
PEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER$5,000
RICK PRESSLEY MEMORIAL LODGE 78$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $173k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT: $50k → 14%WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT: $30k → 14%SHEEP DOG IMPACT ASSISTANCE: $15k → 8%WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT: $30k → 14%SHEEPDOG IMPACT ASSISTANCE: $10k → 8%WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT: $13k → 14%WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT: $5k → 14%SHEEPDOG IMPACT ASSISTANCE: $5k → 8%SAVING GRACE: $5k → 8%HAVENWOOD INC: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$751k · 15 repeat orgs$300k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
18

Total granted

$751k
$260k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+11%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationReligionFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK
    2× · 2019–2022 · $80k · revenue +65%
  • PA
    PEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $61k · revenue +87%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • WR
    WASHINGTON REGIONAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grace House Texarkana Inc

Grace House exists to rescue and advocate for women and families at risk.

Housing & Shelter
2
Women's Crisis Center

Battered women's shelter

—
3
Casa of North Arkansas

The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
4
Rise House Arkansas

To provide assistance to victims of domestic abuse and to educate the community to work toward the prevention of family violence.

Human Services
5
Arkansas Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc

The organization provides a therapeutic shelter and care for homeless and/or abused children.

Housing & Shelter
6
Northwest Arkansas Children's Shelter in Dba Everhope Arkansas Inc

To provide a safe have, high quality care, and hope for the future to chidren who have been abandoned, abused, or neglected.

Human Services
7
Restoration of Hope Inc

Provide tempory shelter to women and children in abusive domestic situations in arkansas county, ar

Human Services
8
Arkansas Hunger Relief Alliance Inc

The alliance is a collaborative organization that works on behalf of arkansans facing hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
The Arkansas Center for Independence

Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities

Human Services
10
Southeast Arkansas Behavioral Healthcare

To create an environment where staff is conscientious to the behavioral health needs of the area in a manner which is client oriented, accessible, affordable, and quality driven.

Health
11
Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Provide help to domestic violence victims and encourage community efforts to promote domestic peace.

—
12
Arkansas Family Alliance F/K/a Whitsonlife Inc

Ministry for child welfare and families in crisis.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Havenwood Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sheep Dog Impact Assistance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $172,500 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHNORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK: $80,000 · OtherNORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANKPEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER INC: $61,000 · OtherPEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER INCCASA: $60,000 · OtherCASAIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherWASHINGTON REGIONAL HOSPITAL: $30,000 · OtherCASA OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS INC: $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · Other+18 more: $228,500 · Other+18 moreWashington Regional Medical Foundation: $127,500 · Human ServicesWashington Regional M…Sheep Dog Impact Assistance: $30,000 · Human ServicesSheep Dog Impact Assi…NORTHWEST ARKANSAS WOMEN'S SHELTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST ARKANSAS WO…HAVENWOOD INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesABILITY TREE INC: $8,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesDUKE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $30,000 · HealthMETHODIST FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $7,500 · HealthINVADE TRANSITIONAL HOME AND MINISTRIES CORP: $20,000 · ReligionCAMP ALDERSGATE INC: $18,000 · Recreation & SportsHarvest Texarkana Regional Food Bank Inc: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$715,000Human Services$200,500Education$50,000Health$37,500Religion$20,000Recreation & Sports$18,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWashington Regional Medical Foundation: $127,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK: $80,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER INC: $61,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSheep Dog Impact Assistance: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS INC: $28,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetINVADE TRANSITIONAL HOME AND MINISTRIES CORP: $20,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS WOMEN'S SHELTER: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCAMP ALDERSGATE INC: $18,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHAVENWOOD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHarvest Texarkana Regional Food Bank Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSERVE NORTHWEST ARKANSAS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBUTTERFLY HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetABILITY TREE INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMETHODIST FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOASIS OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetSAVING GRACE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Washington Regional Medical Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Sheep Dog Impact Assistance ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds INVADE TRANSITIONAL HOME AND MINISTRIES CORP ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS WOMEN'S SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds CAMP ALDERSGATE INC ↗
  • Who funds HAVENWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds Harvest Texarkana Regional Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds SERVE NORTHWEST ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds BUTTERFLY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ABILITY TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds METHODIST FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OASIS OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVING GRACE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Fo…Wal-Mart FoundationArvest FoundationAlice L Walton Founda…The Schmieding Founda…Roy and Christine Stu…Je and le Mabee Found…Walton Family Foundat…The Claude and Betty …Excellerate Foundatio…The Scott FoundationAmerican Electric Pow…
Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR32.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Wal-Mart Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Alice L Walton Foundation · The Schmieding Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Walton Family Foundation Inc · The Claude and Betty Harris Foundation Inc · Excellerate Foundation Charitable Support · The Scott Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Theresa Harris Moore & Joe B Moore Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Theresa Harris Moore & Joe B Moore Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Theresa Harris Moore & Joe B Moore Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Theresa Harris Moore & Joe B Moore Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Theresa Harris Moore & Joe B Moore’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home