· Private foundation
Theresa Harris Moore & Joe B Moore Charitable Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of THERESA HARRIS MOORE & JOE B MOORE CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INVADE TRANSITIONAL HOME | $15,000 |
| SPRINGDALE PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $12,500 |
| NEW BEGINNINGS NWA | $10,000 |
| CASA OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS INC | $10,000 |
| METHODIST FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| PEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER | $5,000 |
| WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT | $5,000 |
| SHEEP DOG IMPACT ASSIST | $5,000 |
| RICK PRESSLEY MEMORIAL LODGE 78 | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $173k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NANORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK2× · 2019–2022 · $80k · revenue +65%
- PAPEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER INC6× · 2019–2024 · $61k · revenue +87%
DUKE UNIVERSITY2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- WRWASHINGTON REGIONAL HOSPITALone grant, 2020 · $30k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $30k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $22k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Grace House exists to rescue and advocate for women and families at risk.
Battered women's shelter
The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.
To provide assistance to victims of domestic abuse and to educate the community to work toward the prevention of family violence.
The organization provides a therapeutic shelter and care for homeless and/or abused children.
To provide a safe have, high quality care, and hope for the future to chidren who have been abandoned, abused, or neglected.
Provide tempory shelter to women and children in abusive domestic situations in arkansas county, ar
The alliance is a collaborative organization that works on behalf of arkansans facing hunger.
Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities
To create an environment where staff is conscientious to the behavioral health needs of the area in a manner which is client oriented, accessible, affordable, and quality driven.
Provide help to domestic violence victims and encourage community efforts to promote domestic peace.
Ministry for child welfare and families in crisis.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Havenwood Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sheep Dog Impact Assistance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Washington Regional Medical Foundation ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds PEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Sheep Dog Impact Assistance ↗
- Who funds CASA OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds INVADE TRANSITIONAL HOME AND MINISTRIES CORP ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS WOMEN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds CAMP ALDERSGATE INC ↗
- Who funds Harvest Texarkana Regional Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds BUTTERFLY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SERVE NORTHWEST ARKANSAS ↗
- Who funds HAVENWOOD INC ↗
- Who funds ABILITY TREE INC ↗
- Who funds METHODIST FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OASIS OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds SAVING GRACE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Wal-Mart Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Alice L Walton Foundation · The Schmieding Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Walton Family Foundation Inc · The Claude and Betty Harris Foundation Inc · Excellerate Foundation Charitable Support · The Scott Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Theresa Harris Moore & Joe B Moore Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Theresa Harris Moore & Joe B Moore Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Theresa Harris Moore & Joe B Moore Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.