Skip to content

· Private foundation

Theodore P Chuffers Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$163kHealth$126kScience & Tech$50kEducation$35kCrime & Legal$26kAnimals$9kPhilanthropy$6kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
$8,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$936k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$25,000
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION INC$10,000
BREECH WITHOUT BORDERS INC$10,000
THE UCLA FOUNDATION$10,000
FREEDOM READS$8,000
IMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA$5,000
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC$5,000
CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC$5,000
LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC$4,000
COUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FREEDOM READS: $8k → 12%FREEDOM READS: $6k → 12%FREEDOM READS: $6k → 12%FREEDOM READS: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$384k · 13 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$384k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+27%

Still filing today

92%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationFood & NutritionEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $153k · revenue +128%
  • EF
    Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +22%
  • CC
    CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $32k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF SANTA CLARA AND SAN MA
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • TS
    THE SILICON VALLEY & MONTEREY BAY AREA CHAPTER OF
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • TS
    THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
2
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Cancer Research Institute Inc

See schedule ocri is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing cancer immunotherapy through scientific discovery and global collaboration. since 1953, cri has funded research that deepens understanding of the immune system and its…

Health
6
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
7
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
9
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
10
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
11
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
12
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $153,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEYCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INCBREECH WITHOUT BORDERS INC: $30,000 · HealthBREECH WITHOUT BORDERS INCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $27,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $21,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncTHE INTERNATIONAL WALDENSTROM'S MACROGLOBULINEMIA FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · HealthTHE INTERNATIONAL WALDENSTROM'S M…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $50,000 · OtherElectronic Frontie…SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF SANTA CLARA AND SAN MA: $10,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOO…THE SILICON VALLEY & MONTEREY BAY AREA CHAPTER OF: $5,000 · OtherTHE SILICON VALLEY…COLUMBIA COLLEGE OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA COLLEGE O…UCLA FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationUCLA FOUN…COUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT: $9,000 · EducationCOUNCIL F…THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $7,000 · EducationTHE HOTCH…SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $6,000 · EducationSOCIAL GO…FREEDOM READS INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesTHE LITTLE LION FOUNDATION: $9,000 · AnimalsIMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Environment
Food & Nutrition$153,000Health$126,000Other$69,000Education$37,000Human Services$26,000Animals$9,000Arts & Culture$5,000Environment$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $153,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBREECH WITHOUT BORDERS INC: $30,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $27,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM READS INC: $26,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL WALDENSTROM'S MACROGLOBULINEMIA FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LITTLE LION FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Theodore P Chuffers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Theodore P Chuffers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Freedom Reads Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Theodore P Chuffers Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Theodore P Chuffers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Theodore P Chuffers’ filings →

More from the funding graph